bullets13

regardless of who that is, it will be a blow. but that being said, there are always plenty of decent players floating through the halls there, and always the possibility of a move in here or there. a down year for them may mean they're not a top-25 team in the state, but it doesn't take all that much to be a top-10 team in the area. what's a down year for them? 22-11? 19-10? I'm willing to bet that's better than several squads listed by the two folks above.

a qb throwing for 175 yds and 1 TD a game isn't going to win crap over the course of the season, but that's what he averaged during that 4-1 stretch.

HJ graduated some seniors, but they went 30-6 last year, have key pieces returning, and always reload. Just like the last several years, they'll be a fair step behind Silsbee, PAM, and BU, but to see two people make top-10 lists and neither put them on there is laughable.

I can't comment on Lance, but Rush isn't half the qb that Dak is, as little as that says.

The difference between the two was Romo would put up 35, the defense would allow 38, then everyone would call Romo a choker for not being able to go 70 yds in 15 seconds to win it. He also was awesome without an offensive line

this is right, I just figured it out sooner than you. a pretty good game manager, and possibly the best QB against bad teams in the history of the league. If he could find even a fraction of that type of success against good teams he'd be an elite qb. but he hasn't, and he can't. If he can't lead THIS team deep in the playoffs, he's never leading ANY team deep in the playoffs. I look at the quality around him and wonder what might've been if Romo had enjoyed this kind of talent on both sides of the ball. But I actually know: if Romo had the team around him that Dak has had the last 5 years or so, he would've won multiple rings.

Your theory only works if the 3rd party has an actual chance to win. This one doesnt. We'll see how it plays out, but most people in the center who previously voted against Trump understand enough to realize that a vote for RFK is in fact a vote for Trump, as RFK has no chance to win. If they're insistent on voting against Trump, they're also not going to cast a vote that increases Trump's chance to win, but will instead just vote for Biden again. Where Trump gets hurt is the people on the right who were forced to vote for Trump even though they hate him, who now have a more palatable option. But time will tell.

RFK is running better with Repubs than with Dems. That's why he's rebranding as an independent. You know who is praying for an alternative to Biden that isn't trump? a good chunk of republicans, as well as most moderates. RFK will definitely take more votes from Trump than Biden. Biden had a 50 point lead over him in polls amongst democrats.

gonna decrease Trump's chances even more.

a truer point has never been made. he is legitimately the most negative poster in the history of the site. Thank God he's not a WOS fan.

HF guy here. It can be both. More respect for one and warranted criticism for the other

Gladly take that pickem loss

Quick answer

If you can’t beat us, join us 😉

Great district. Great place to live as well. I work at the elementary, and my wife works at the high school.

Gonna be the second time I couldn’t pull the trigger on picking LaPorte when I wanted to

1. Barbers Hill 2. Crosby 3. Kingwood Park 4. Port Arthur Memorial 5. Dayton 6. Nederland 7. Fort Bend Marshall 8. Livingston 9. Vidor 10. Jasper 11. West Orange-Stark 12. Liberty 13. Woodville 14. Crockett 15. Kirbyville 16. Orangefield 17. New Waverly 18. Kountze 19. Joaquin 20. Garrison 21. San Augustine 22. Corrigan-Camden 23. Jewett Leon 24. Deweyville 25. Hull-Daisetta

Short sided, to say the least.

This is how the rangers were playing the first half of the season when they were running away with the division. Hopefully they keep it up

One very valid argument for putting them in a centralized place is that in theory it's a lot easier to help them. Volunteers, city programs, whatever, are going to be more effective when the majority of their targeted population to help is together, vs spread out all over the city.

They’re costing the city money anyway. I’d prefer them do so off of city streets.

I would like to see that for welfare, but don’t care much one way or another to qualify for a place out in the woods to congregate and get a shower.

Staying solid

What a game! Hate I missed it

I mean, their QB is 4-0 this year