All Activity

Excellent post. Thanks for your input and clearing things up. Appreciate it Coach!

I was supposed to read all of that into you saying “this isn’t junior high”? Yes, they would have understood my post whereas, you didn’t. Who’s being immature?…..bee/fly.

My response that YOU quoted... "president pedo/pedo supporter" that quote was in reference to the clown in office. Wasn't referencing anyone on here.. u read it how u wanted.

How do you know the signs didn’t have any effect? Subliminal thought is real.

You completely missed my point. In junior high kids “love” someone who favors them, then will turn around and “hate” them when disfavored. I was referring to political immaturity. So yes, anyone in junior high would have understood your post.

I don’t know. 25 or 30 percent left on the bone will leave enough meat for a little competition.

Junior high? Anyone in junior high could see my post is self explanatory. Like you, I don’t agree with all decisions but I can live with it because our forefathers were visionaries and covered all the bases. This decision also disproves the “dictator” or “king” claims. What a waste of cardboard for all of those signs.

Yes, I would, but not for the reasons you think. The more conservative the commentary on tariffs, the louder the protest against them has been. Allowing such an egregious violation of executive powers would have confirmed them as a kangaroo court. I can handle conservatives, lapdogs I cannot.

If Warren gets a good coach, they should be able to beat Newton. As you indicated multiple times, winning has little to do with talent and primarily comes down to coaching. Speed, coordination and strength meaning very little. I was recently at an event and noticed how the Warren kids looked exactly like the Newton kids and that there is no reason for Warren to not compete with Newton. Still cant figure out why college coaches only recruit athletically dominant players? Seems like they could win with any group of players with good coaching.

This X infinity. POTUS will either have to work with Congress (doubtful—especially with early primaries going already), or find another way. Bad thing is, people will expect prices to come down and they won’t.

Franklin 8 New Waverly 3 final/5.... game called bottom 5 Franklin had 2 on no outs when game called. New Waverly will make some noise this year in their district.

As your buddy JoeBama would say, “Come on Man”! You’d be hollering if it went the other way!

No just one basketball player and he's doing both when he can

What is your deal? This isn’t junior high. This is a victory for the Constitution and affirmation that the court will interpret it collectively. I may not agree with all their interpretations, but this is strong evidence that they will not serve as lapdogs to the Executive branch.

Well, this is true. That’s why you keep trying. A school district either cares or they don’t. Unfortunately maybe Warren is in the don’t care category.

No doubt, if it went the other way they would be screaming to stack the court.

I’m guessing refunds will require another lawsuit.

Yes, and I agree. But since the ruling is against Trump, they will love this conservative SC.

The Constitution just entered the chat.

Everyone should, it confirms our separation of powers. 🙂

Now the libs will love this SC.

If nothing changes, then nothing gonna change.

Long time listener first time caller a couple things here on warm ups 1. You are allowed 21 match games and 3 tournaments (can also do 23 games and 2 tournaments and a few other combinations but no one does that), how many games you play in a tournament doesn't change anything. You can play 6 or you can play 3 and it still counts as a tournament. Jamborees or showcases or whatever you want to call them count as one of your 21 games. The UIL changed this to 21/2 or 19/3 about ten years ago and then changed it back after a year or two due to coaches not being happy at all with the change. Not even sure what the original reasoning was for the change to be honest. 2. The warm-up era was huge when the UIL switched from allowing 2 teams to 3 teams to make the playoffs in the late 90's I think it was. At that point in time (most of the 00's) if you won district you had a first round bye which meant not playing for a week and a half and that was felt to be too long by most coaches, so that is when you saw the warm-up game really take off. Once the UIL allowed 4 teams to make it now there is only a week between games and you started to see less and less warm up games. I also think the mandatory UIL one game suspension for an ejection has played into this as well. Now not only are you risking injury with only a week between games you are also risking the potential of having a first round suspension due to an ejection, so that plays a small role as well. In my opinion (just one coach others may feel totally different), the only real value in warm up games now are like what you see with Coach Sutherland at EC and as mentioned above is you lose so many games to the football team making the playoffs and you have an opportunity to make one up because you didn't even get close to your game limit. Also, if you are a massive powerhouse like Silsbee and you more or less ran through your district without any close games at all like they did several times in the last decade, you don't want to go into the playoffs without having played a close game in a month and a half, so going and playing high level competition in a warm-up game adds value. Also think that if the UIL flips to what they did with volleyball ( and rumor is it is probably going to happen) and the regular season ends on Friday and the first round of the playoffs starts on Thursday/Friday the following week, which would leave Monday/Tuesday as your warm up game options, in my opinion the warm-up game is completely dead at that point.

This should get interesting, I know the commentary from both sides this morning has been.