Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Trump signed off on releasing the files and the only new names are democrats…..so there’s that.
  3. These dems are the ones who don’t know what they are talking about…..
  4. [Hidden Content] He is so unprofessional. Is he lashing about because is name is in the Epstein emails?
  5. I agree. Franklin has talent. I guess we’ll see you at the regional finals again in baseball this year. Good luck & I think yall played a fair game with lots of respect for each other.
  6. It’s ok for dems. As long as you’re not Nixon’s staff. Some of them did jail time. Numerous high-profile officials went to prison for the Watergate scandal, including former White House aides H.R. Haldeman, John Ehrlichman, and John Dean. Others included Attorney General John Mitchell, special counsel Charles Colson, and operatives G. Gordon Liddy and E. Howard Hunt. White House and campaign officials Dwight Chapin: Special assistant to Nixon, he was convicted of lying to a grand jury and served time. H.R. Haldeman: President Nixon's Chief of Staff served time for conspiracy and obstruction of justice. John Ehrlichman: Nixon's Domestic Affairs advisor, also went to prison for his involvement. John Dean: White House Counsel who resigned and was later jailed for obstruction of justice. Charles Colson: Special counsel to the President, also served time in prison. Campaign and intelligence figures John Mitchell: Former U.S. Attorney General and Chairman of the Committee to Re-elect the President (CREEP), he was convicted of conspiracy and obstruction of justice. G. Gordon Liddy: A key planner of the Watergate break-in, he served the longest prison sentence of any Watergate figure. E. Howard Hunt: A former CIA operative and member of the "Plumbers" unit, he was jailed for his role in the conspiracy. James McCord Jr.: Security director for CREEP who was one of the burglars and later testified against the others.
  7. Final Cypress Ridge 51 Baytown Sterling 56
  8. It won’t surprise me at all if 9-5A gets swept, but at best, I think they go 1-3.
  9. Today
  10. TBH he seems a little butt hurt 😂
  11. lol Franklin dominated that game from start to finish. Give Orangefield credit they played great but by saying franklin is not very good what would that make Orangefield? Didn't live up to the hype? They put up more points on Orangefield then anyone this season including the 4ad1 team that is still playing all with only two total passes. Orangefield qb was putting passes on a dot and not much you can do when he puts them to where only his wr's can catch them. How do you figure they are over ranked? Maybe Hardin and Orangefield is better then you gave your own area credit for. I actually predicted the final to be 63-35 and if it wasn't for that block in the back I would have been spot on. Orangefield Avg PPG is 38 and they scored 34 so they were pretty close to meeting it.
  12. Final scores Cypress Creek 51 North Shore 68 Fort Bend Dulles 48 Pasadena 45
  13. Agreed. 2-3 stops per half would be even better. I don't see EW stopping WV's offense!
  14. So it is OK for you to know but not for every one else. Hummm
  15. PNG played three larger schools in non-district play, had a win over a Top 10 ranked team and beat two other teams that were in the Top 25 of the final computer rankings. Not hating on BC, but their schedule was considerably tougher.
  16. XYZ gate…lol
  17. Anybody seen ticket options
  18. I don’t have a dog in the fight.. I haven’t watched Bridge City once this year but I have watched Navasota…Truth be told they have been a average to above 4A team at times this year… Doesn’t mean at their best they couldn’t be better but we will see
  19. What post is this in reference to?
  20. They gave up some points and didn’t look to great defending the pass but the run defense seemed on point. Offensively they did what they wanted to. Ranked to high? Maybe maybe not… but no question who the better team was last night
  21. Woodville just needs a few stops and its their game
  22. Do we have a final stat for the game ??
  23. The refs were flagging both teams, but watching on TL or whatever, the camera isn't always on the extra side action going on, so I can't say what happened every time. The refs were in a sort of confusion, throwing flags then waving them off, then throwing the flag again. The announcers kept blaming the rain delay, amusingly, saying that it caused "animosity". As far as body slamming, the MP RB, or at least one, was sort of small, and the SOC defenders repeatedly would tackle him by just lifting him up into the air, but i didn't see them body slam, and didn't see the one in question. On the one of the extra points the announcers claimed that 2 or 3 players from both teams were flagged, so offsetting penalties, however the consequence is if any of them got another USC then they would be out of the game. Tough game overall, and I don't think that MP was ready for that type of intensity. If Huntsville gets to play SOC, then it will surely be interesting, IMO, just based on what I saw of Huntsville at PNG this season.
  24. Franklins Offense is good, but overall i think they may be slightly over ranked. But I als may have just set the bar too high I was expecting a phenomenal team overall and was not impressed. I think they may struggle to get out of the region. They just didn't live up to the hype, but again I may have set the bar way to high. I'm off to support Hardin tonight lets go Hornets and District 10.
  1. Load more activity


×
×
  • Create New...