All Activity

Don’t know how things have progressed but the current JR class had to cancel games in middle school due to “lack of numbers”.

Personally, I don't think the talent has dropped much at all overall. Do they have a Smith or an Armstrong? No. But got plenty of talent.

Has the talent dropped off that much since that year they went 4 rounds in the playoffs with him as HC?

Port arthur in this one Port Arthur Memorial 53 Beaumont United 14

I’m sure I’ll be able to watch on YouTube PAISD. We know BISD not doing nothing unless it’s WB VS. BU which is sad.

Correct as I originally stated in my first post ITT supporting ABC’s right to suspend, fire him, whatever. The post you quoted, or the exact portion you quoted, however, was the line dealing with a governmental official; specifically the FCC chair using his position to suppress speech. Which coincidentally was the whole point of the article that was linked where Ted Cruz was also criticizing him for the same reason I was. Every time I come to this board, usually takes about 24 hours for me to remember why it’s been weeks or sometimes months since my last visit 😂

I did not miss it, ABC is not Government owned. Whataboutism's is what folks use when they don't want to be called a hypocrite. You did say just as bad, so that was not aimed at you. I would disagree and say it is worse silencing someone running for President versus a talk show host trying to make people laugh or whatever it was he as trying to do. Lastly, had he just apologized as his Boss asked him to do, he would be back on television. We can ignore the past or learn from it.

Yep, just as bad. Although you miss the distinction that Twitter isn’t government owned. I just love being in the middle while the hypocritical idiots on the fringes of both sides continue to play whataboutism. Super productive.

Yup - Republicans were up in arms when Trump was kicked off twitter during his campaign. Democrats not so much. This is just the opposite, although, Kimmel is not running for an elected office.

BTW, I need to correct myself on the all time series between these two teams. I incorrectly posted that Silsbee led the series 2-1 going into this game. The correct record was 3-0 for Silsbee. So this was the first time ever for West Brook to beat Silsbee.

I’m certainly not most people and I agree with this search. Obscenity would shut a lot of mouths. I don’t believe anyone should say “F” you to police. Freedom of speech in the U.S. is not absolute and does not cover incitement to imminent lawless action, defamation, obscenity, child pornography, fraud, true threats, or speech that causes a substantial and material disruption in specific contexts, like a school. The First Amendment applies only to government restrictions, not actions by private entities like employers or social media companies. Categories of Unprotected Speech The First Amendment does not protect the following types of speech: Incitement to imminent lawless action:Speech that is intended and likely to produce immediate illegal activity. Defamation:False statements of fact that harm someone's reputation. Obscenity:Material that appeals to the prurient interest, is patently offensive, and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. Child Pornography:Any material depicting actual minors engaged in sexually suggestive conduct or nudity. Fraud:False statements made with the intent to deceive. True Threats:Statements that express a serious intent to commit an act of unlawful violence against a particular individual or group. Fighting Words:Insults that are likely to provoke a violent physical response. Context-Specific Limitations Schools:Speech by students can be restricted if it causes a material and substantial disruption to the school environment. Protests:The police can break up a lawful protest if there is a clear and present danger to public safety, the protest interferes with traffic, or there's an immediate threat. Limitations on the Application of the First Amendment Government vs. Private Entities:The First Amendment only restricts government action; it does not apply to private companies or organizations. For example, a private company can fire an employee for their speech, or a social media platform can ban users for content that the government could not

I don't think BU gets shut out, I'll say that at least. 😎💪🏾 At the moment Port Arthur Memorial is a 35pt favorite, I expect that to change by Monday/Tuesday.

District opener at The Butch. This should be a good one. 🤷🏾‍♂️

The truth of the matter is, most people only want free speech when it agrees with their own thoughts and ideas.

My plays from this list: Utah -3.5 Illini +6.5 South Carolina +9.5 Miami -8.5 tu +39.5 Mich. St. +19.5 I normally stay away from large spreads but I believe Sark will keep Arch in longer than he should just to send a message that they "Are back!!!". lol

Evadale is not what they use to be

Jimmy Kimmel and his hate filled “free speech” is responsible for Charlie Kirk’s death. Freedom of speech is not a license to incite hate. Even Geraldo Rivera said that. Who is really going to miss Kimmel’s show? It wasn’t even a talk show. It was simply a mouthpiece for the left.

He's definitely a "glass half empty" guy. Astros are not just 1 game back of Seattle, but they are also just 1 game back of being the #2 overall seed in the AL. Lot's can happen over these last 8 games and they all are not negative like someone would lead you to believe.

They were big for sure…It’s pretty impressive how far they have come from last year…

Already giving up on this series? Astros don’t need fair weather fans. Heck, you’re not even that.

It's more about the coaches knowing about the "players" they're coaching then knowing more about coaching. It looks like things might shape up to be OK right now though

Interested to see how WV progresses throughout the season. Really want to understand who actually "knows more" about coaching between the WV coaches or the WV fans.

That would ring true on any website not owned by the Government.

I don't recall the left being free speech champions during the 2016 election when Trump lost his platform on Twitter during a Presidential election....OR, during covid with everyone. I posted receipts in this tread earlier of Kamala, Schumer and Jefferies of trying to persuade free speech. To me, banning a Presidential candidate from the largest social media platform was one of the worst "free speech" issues in my lifetime, yet the left seemed pretty happy about it.......

Very true. This is a single ownership website. No democracy here. His rules. Like it or leave it.