All Activity

I do not, but I’m not the one automatically jumping to anti Trump conclusions.

Do you really know? Let's say she was trying to protect the victims. Who on that panel would expose the victims?

How do you know that?

What I keep saying is, there’s a big difference in someone being named, someone even documented as being there, and being able to prove a criminal case without a doubt when it would probably revert to a circumstantial he said/she said against folks who have the ability to hire the best lawyers on the planet—if you could even get them to trial. There’s no way you’re getting the foreign actors here to stand trial. That’s why I keep saying shame and ostracism are probably what we’ll get.

Really? All we know is what is being released. They(congress) are trying to interpret redacted emails, accusations from anonymous sources, etc…… a single do or don’t can change the meaning of a redacted document 100%. Allegations have plagued Trumps terms by Democrats….Russigate….

If she was truly going after those involved there would be no allegations of a cover up.

It’s entirely probable that’s why they’re logging. But, the reason doesn’t really matter. ALL SCIF activity is tracked and logged. That’s the nature of a SCIF. As the Head of the Dept. owning the information, she would have access.

What if she was using it to collect evidence on Congress people that may be involved with the Epstein case? Would you be for or against that?

The DOJ claims it logs searches to protect against the release of victim information within the sensitive, unreacted files. Was Bondi utilizing it it that manner? Probably not.

That I can’t say. All I can say is everything done in a SCIF is tracked and recorded. This is done for security purposes. I didn’t see the interview y’all say Bondi bombed out on other than snippets here. I DID see the news article with the photo of the notes on Jayapal. They weren’t anything special, and would be typical tracking. I can understand why Bondi would have notes on what everyone viewed. I wouldn’t necessarily jump to a malicious conclusion. She may have merely wanted to be prepared, since she knew it was going to be a ‘gotcha’ meeting. How many meetings like that have you seen where the person being grilled couldn’t give an answer because they were caught unaware of what they may be asked? (They were set up for the visuals & press.) Like I say, I doubt it was nefarious. She knows her job is on the line and wanted to be prepared. But, that’s just my take.

Was it used in the manner it was intended for? If not, someone has some explaining to do.

All the folks that are invested, is this true? Elizabeth Stein She works for Tides Foundation (soros open society funded) funded World Without Exploitation They produced the superbowl commercial of "victims" this past weekend She was a FULL GROWN ASS WOMAN when she met Maxwell at her job at 21 years old She formed a 3 year *friendship* with Epstein and Maxwell........apparently sexual She didn't realize she was trafficked until 30 years later when Epstein was sentenced. She attempted but failed to recover funds from the Victims fund Maxwell's attorney pointed out she did not legally qualify as a “crime victim” under the CVRA and she received no payout. But she sure did try.

Elon Musk talked about this on Joe Rogan’s podcast. Literally save hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars. Money being paid to folks older than the oldest person on earth and some that have yet to be born. He said folks from both sides have their hand in the cookie jar but much much more by the democrats, 85-90% if I recall.

19-5A Tonight, 7pm

19-5A Tonight, 7pm

19-5A Tonight, 7pm

West Sabine 76 Woden 46

19-5A Tonight, 7pm

If it was not an effort to get Trump, why all of a sudden did this turn into another “me too” fiasco?

18-4A Tonight, 6:30pm

18-4A Tonight, 7pm

18-4A Tonight, 7pm

Paxton!

19-4A Tonight, 7pm