All Activity

I submit this for your consideration. Judicial review dates to 1803 and Marbury vs Madison. [Hidden Content]

46 seconds 4th 66-57 Madison

Proud of how hard the Bobcats have continued to compete. Lot of heart on the floor and on the bench.

Maybe not.

1:04 4th 63-53 Madison

2:33 4th 63-53 Madison

Do you mean for 3A-D1?

3:44 4th 61-48 Madison 26 TO's for OF

4:44 4th 61-44 Madison

Truth

Im not impressed by Madison , their not a bad team but its more of Orangefield playing poorly !!!!!

The two best teams in 3A played each other on the 5th.

Then why have a Supreme Court. Does the Constitution limit them to interpreting only within the context of the world as it existed in 1789?

6:30 4th 58-39 Madison

End 3rd 53-37 Madison Scales with 4 fouls.

1:20 3rd 50-33 Madison

Gotta make layups when they get them

3:07 3rd 44-31 Madison OF with 21 turnovers. Madison with 23 points off those turnovers.

I think Madison is just to athletic for Orangefield.

Orangefield is gonna get a T soon if they don’t chill out. Could’ve had a couple already

4:00 3rd 42-29 Madison

5:35 2nd 36-24 Madison

^^^^True This^^^^

Orangefield can get easy baskets when they don’t panic against the press. They’re very fortunate that Madison has horrible shot selection or they’d be too far down to come back

“As intended” means exactly what it says. The original intent. Otherwise known as originalism. Any other type of interpretation is nothing more than an attempt to change the Constitution because you don’t like what it says and means. The Constitution doesn’t change with the times, and was never meant to do so. As you say, the framers were thoughtful. They thought of a way to adapt the Constitution to new situations. The manner is done by the same method as was used to create the Constitution. “By the people” through Amendments.