All Activity

[Hidden Content] Shooter dead from self-inflicted gunshot. Bullets found with Anti Ice messages.

Someone who tried mail order Ozempic.

I don’t watch him, but I heard his explanation. It sounded sincere and I still won’t watch him. It’s not worth the discussion time. Colbert is much worse than he is.

Disney should probably just move him to Hulu.

One of Commie Kimmel's first guest was Gavin Newscum. Commie Kimmel hasn't learned anything! SMH!

Let's not forget our censurer in chief: Obama [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] This stuff is really rich when you jog your memory on some of it...

Tell me liberalism is NOT a mental illness! LOL! To be honest, I'm not really sure what this is!

If we play our cards right this could possibly happen! @Big girl @UT alum > you OK? @Boyz N Da Hood What say you?!

Again -- why is it so easy for commie libs to lie?!

LOL. It’s what I hated about Watergate. Back then, the censorship covered the sponsors too. You couldn’t mention a competitor by name, e. g. “The cuckoo blade”. Nowadays, I guess it would be a court battle.

Better, unless the President came on…on all 3 channels. Invariably, he would interrupt Miss Kitty, Marshall Dillon, and Festus after we waited all week for the episode.

It will be as much as Coach Rich wants to score. I think he will try some 2nd stringers fairly early and keep the score respectful.

In the olden days, censorship television was not ever considered a 1st amendment violation. It was back when people still had dignity and respect. Things were sure better back then. Those days will never return…..sad

This. Just this.

If PN-G doesn't have a letdown, I don't see this one as anywhere close. Indians with relative ease. I really don't see anyone challenging PN-G in district this year. Maybe Dayton. But, Huntsville is a big disappointment, and Montgomery was shredded by Kingwood Park. I just don't see a challenge coming.

PNG: 38 Lake Creek: 20

oh, I see, big difference!

Ned: 34 Splendora: 3

Had it been a fight, we would have separated them and let the school have it This was a bigger kid trying to beat down another student with a teacher standing in between them trying to protect the victim who wanted no part of the confrontation. The bully reached over the teacher and clobbered the other student in the face.

fify

Yeah. Sounds kind of fishy. They'd be sticking the knife in their own back since they pay millions for the rights, then the affiliates pay them. College football is a much bigger draw than Kimmel. The major over-the-air networks are basically empty shell corporations without their affiliates. Advertisers aren't going to pay enough for Disney/ABC to even compete to purchase sports programming without the affiliates. They'd lose a much larger audience if they moved everything strictly to ESPN. Many aren't going to pay. Especially nowadays. Advertisers wouldn't be happy about that move either. I think if Disney/ABC want to play chicken with their affiliates, Nexstar and Sinclair may have the upper hand.

I struggle with this. I know times have changed, but the fights I had from elementary through high school taught me lots of life lessons.. I remember at Edison before it came to blows, I knew I was probably going to lose AND get licks from the coach......and I was right on BOTH predictions.....lol

Don't know how true this is but I saw where ABC is threatening Nexstar, Sinclair and others with not providing SEC football broadcasts to those companies if they don't air Jimmy. Sounds made up to me. I have not tried to verify.

I agree with the deputy constable. What the district did was inappropriate at best. When I was in detectives I investigated sex crimes and child victims for a couple of years. I have seen school districts obstruct investigations or try to influence the outcome. The outcome being, no bad publicity at the expense of the school. There is absolutely no reason to bring a reported victim, especially a child, into a room with the suspect and have the principal in the room running the investigation. That is unbelievable. Not so strangely, I have witnessed that exact attempt. My partner and I were investigating a sexual offense with a student being the suspect. We went to the school and had them bring the student out of class to speak with us for a felony. We attempted to interview the student at the school so it’s not to disrupt his day any more than necessary. A school representative said that is okay however they would get to sit in and listen to the investigation. Uhhhhh……. No. The school’s response was that they would not allow us to interview the student then. The solution was simple enough, we simply removed him from the school and brought him to the police station, making him lose a significant amount of time. The interviews of witnesses, the victim, and if agreed to, the suspect, are private interactions and should not be viewed by anyone except the Police conducting interview. The school districts should not be involved in criminal investigations or interfere in criminal investigations. On another occasion, I was working security at a high school and witnessed a student assault another student while a teacher was standing between them trying to stop it. The suspect reached over the teacher and punched the other student in the face. My partner and I had a suspect in handcuffs in about 10 seconds. What was the school district’s response? To try to get us to drop the charges, un-arrest the suspect allowing him to walk away and let the school handle it internally. Certainly, that way it would not make the news media. The school interjected themselves into speaking on behalf of the victim in the crime, which they had absolutely no authority to do. The victim or his family might tell the DA that they didn’t want to follow through with charges but that is of no business of the school. Nope….. the suspect went to jail. I assisted my partner on a case he was working against a school teacher. The teacher got mad and threw a heavy set of car keys, striking a student in the eye. He ended up going to the hospital. The school stepped in and told if us that they would not allow the teacher to speak with us. The teacher is not required to speak with the police and could claim her right to remain silent and her right to an attorney. The odd thing was the school district stepping in and taking part in it by telling the teacher not to tell her side of the story. She very well might not have talked to us however but why was the school district stepping in to back up a teacher when the victim student was in the hospital? I could go on but hopefully that paints a picture. I understand them not wanting to air their dirty laundry in the public. Working for a police department, I have seen the same. In the case of a school district however the main focus should be the protection of students. Sadly that may be compromised where the student is thrown under the bus to protect the school. Those are anecdotal cases and hopefully most districts now will not allow worrying about bad press interfere with the safety of the students. Sometimes I wonder though. In my examples the cases were more than 20 years ago. Is it still happening today? This article……..

We have been complaining for years about the shadow banning and cancel culture. Many, not all Democrats and Trump haters supported and celebrated it. They did not want to hear things they disagreed with. They even came up with safe spaces....lol There have been so many phobia's made up, dictionary's would need to be re-written (if they were paper now days) Now we have direct proof of a couple things. 1. The Obama administration purposely sabotaged an incoming President. 2. The Biden administration purposely silenced private companies...... Yet, the left's outrage today is about a private company taking a comedian off their network......