Jump to content

Nederland vs. Livingston Predictions?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Brubaker

Warrior, I've watched you post, you know what you are talking about.  PNG turned the ball over left and right against Livingston and won by much less that Ned beat PNG.  You saw both games, PNG had one turnover that led to points.  How many did Livingston have, at least two.  Hey bud, I don't blame you, I would predict/hope Ned loses if I were in the same situation even if the facts said otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a smash-mouth football district.  Even Nederland had to toughen themselves on offense after what WO-S did to them.  I look at teams who run the ball and play tough physical defense at the end of the day, win ball games barring turnovers.  Livingston did go 10-3 last year running the Wing T.  The Wing T, an offense from the 30's and 40's with some updated wrinkles.  The Central game could have been much worse if Central's QB really ran that Bone, i. e. could pitch on occation.  Nederland is still soft on the run and because it is, they put at least 8-10 on the box, and it caused them to play #21 and #5, their best WR's as corners and they were beat every time.

I watched the last 5 minutes or so of the Livingston/PN-G game and if they run the dive play with half of the success against Nederland, it will be a long night in MC.  They also get after the QB on defense so I see a repeat of this past Friday.  BTW, my daughter was on the homecoming court(I'm so proud of her).....

Coushata(sp) Lions 42

Nederland 14

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Typical 85 post. Always insert the "ifs" for the MC opponent. How about some "ifs" for Nederland. "If" Nederland hadn't thrown that INT. "If" Nederland hadn't fumbled that ball. "If' Nederland had stayed with the ground game (especially in the red zone) that was churning up some major yards against a supposed "solid" defense like Central? I will not call Central's defense "soft' against the run out of respect, but I believe Nederland can effectively run the ball if they will just not abandon it.

I haven't seen Livingston play. I hear they are faster and bigger than Nederland. Wow, I bet that's the first time that has happened. Maybe 5 minutes of viewing can convince me otherwise.....not!

Nederland 24

Livingston  17

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't seen Big Ned play yet, but I have seen Livingston. They are big, but I think if Nederland uses it's assets, in other words, BOTH the running and passing game I think they can come out on top. I'm pulling for Nederland on this and I call it as a high scoring affair, somewhere around 49 - 45, I don't think either D is going to slow the other a whole lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a smash-mouth football district.  Even Nederland had to toughen themselves on offense after what WO-S did to them.  I look at teams who run the ball and play tough physical defense at the end of the day, win ball games barring turnovers.  Livingston did go 10-3 last year running the Wing T.  The Wing T, an offense from the 30's and 40's with some updated wrinkles.  The Central game could have been much worse if Central's QB really ran that Bone, i. e. could pitch on occation.  Nederland is still soft on the run and because it is, they put at least 8-10 on the box, and it caused them to play #21 and #5, their best WR's as corners and they were beat every time.

I watched the last 5 minutes or so of the Livingston/PN-G game and if they run the dive play with half of the success against Nederland, it will be a long night in MC.  They also get after the QB on defense so I see a repeat of this past Friday.  BTW, my daughter was on the homecoming court(I'm so proud of her).....

Coushata(sp) Lions 42

Nederland 14

whatever...once a hater always a hater...lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dawgs 118

Lions 2  (dang saftey almost killed us)

J/K obviously..1.gif

Predictions are so..........uuuhhhh........unpredictable.

I just want to see the DAWGS regroup from the loss to the Jaguars and come to play like I know they are capable of.  If they do so, I really feel they will win in a close game going down to the last few minutes.  It's sure going to be nice to be back at the Dog Pound after 2 road games.

9.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Typical 85 post. Always insert the "ifs" for the MC opponent. How about some "ifs" for Nederland. "If" Nederland hadn't thrown that INT. "If" Nederland hadn't fumbled that ball. "If' Nederland had stayed with the ground game (especially in the red zone) that was churning up some major yards against a supposed "solid" defense like Central? I will not call Central's defense "soft' against the run out of respect, but I believe Nederland can effectively run the ball if they will just not abandon it.

I haven't seen Livingston play. I hear they are faster and bigger than Nederland. Wow, I bet that's the first time that has happened. Maybe 5 minutes of viewing can convince me otherwise.....not!

Nederland 24

Livingston  17

Ned was bound to throw a pick or 2.  They had your best WR on lock with a kid that runs a 10.6 100 meters.  Don't be mad at me because Nuemann didn't stick with the run.  Fumbles and INT's are a part of football.  The team with the least of them usually wins but since you watch football like a woman, I guess you wouldn't know such things.

Central may have 'changed' their offense last Monday but the Airforce/Flexbone is a variation of the original Wishbone with some twist.  Again, y'all are lucky Central only ran 1/3 of the offense since I didn't see much QB keep or pitch.  Just dives and spectacular play on 3rd down from their QB.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never said we couldn't throw a pick or two. It's just that if you say a woulda coulda for Central, you have to give the same for Nederland. Third down was our demise, and two rainbows that could have been defensed.

Now, lower that skirt chickadee, you have ugly thighs and bony knees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm taking notes on who the smart posters are, png1 you get a checkmark, ndnwarrior, you get a minus... thought you knew more football bud.  No amount of Nederland losing will improve your season.

Just my opinion, Bru.  I predicted that Central would give Nederland a hard time, and they did, they beat them.  I've seen Livingston play and I feel they are underated.  I think it will be close, but I think Livingston will come out with the win.  Livingston has a lot of speed, not sure that the Dogs can handle it, just my opinion.  As for the Indians season, we know what our mistakes are/were and will try to correct them and continue this season....not expecting Nederland's losses to improve our season...that was a bit "childish", wouldn't you say? >:(

Central always plays us Tough

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After seeing the Bears play both teams, I'm going with the Dawgs.  It took the whole game for Livingston to put 50 on the board against us while Big Ned did it in a half.

Livingston has more speed that the Dawgs won't be able to contain all night but overall I think Nederland's a better team.  The Dogs are also bigger which should play a factor.

Plus, so far in district, playing LCM assures defeat..... the week after.

Nederland 35,  Livingston 21.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Warrior, I've watched you post, you know what you are talking about.  PNG turned the ball over left and right against Livingston and won by much less that Ned beat PNG.  You saw both games, PNG had one turnover that led to points.  How many did Livingston have, at least two.  Hey bud, I don't blame you, I would predict/hope Ned loses if I were in the same situation even if the facts said otherwise.

I'm taking notes on who the smart posters are, png1 you get a checkmark, ndnwarrior, you get a minus... thought you knew more football bud.

Which one is it? Or is it just based on whether or not his opinion agrees with yours.  :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have seen them both play and if Nederland can come out on 1st down with  3-4 yard gain the advantage is in their favor...Livingston's front line does a great job in blowing people off the ball which if it continues to smash mouth its way through could have success....

I wont play the "jet lag" factor here.....High scoring since Nederlands "D" will have trouble, Livingstons secondary will give up (2) big plays.....

Livingston 38

Nederland 27

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to take anything away from central but their big plays were busted plays that ended up working out, receivers covered well then quarterback scrambles for 10-20 yards or hail mary type passes. They probably had as many stops for losses as positive plays. On the other hand Ned could not pass on the speedy corners of Central we abandoned the run and short passing game. We need to get better at mixing in the short and intermediate passes with the run. Also mix in a different formation every now and then. I realize we run the spread but line up with the QB under center and a TE just to through a wrinkle. We are predictable.

GO DOGS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest 87CRU79

IMO, Barrow needs to install a "power" package for inside the 5 yard line, similar to what Texas does when they're on the goalline when DT Roy Miller goes in at FB. Just put Bellow under center, a big DL/OL at FB and put Wareall behind him and pound the rock. Just a thought....

Defense needs to play with the intenstity they had in the first 3 district contests if they hope to make it to big dance this year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Livingston, playing at home, continuing to improve week after week, and with their speed, along with the fact that they are hungry to solidify a playoff spot, I'm sorry, but I think Livingston will come away with a "W" for this one.  It's gonna be a good one, for sure!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined



  • Posts

    • High Point walks it off.  Vandy Whistler headed home!
    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
    • Wake is about to go from Preseason #1 to the 1st team eliminated 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...