spidersal Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago The answer is simple. A culture change and good coaches. Neumann did it and he had several good assistants like pate and Spell. It is obvious that the dogs do not have a whole lot of talent, but you can overcome that through hard work and having football since. Those things can be taught. When you have a ton of penalties and are known around the area as playing dirty you want win many games. Also, you have to teach how to have success after several losing seasons. PNG doesn’t seem to have a problem with that. Why, because they hired a coach that believes in defense 1st and he has very good assistant coaches. Unfortunately Nederland does not! Quote
NHSBulldogFan Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago 2 hours ago, spidersal said: The answer is simple. A culture change and good coaches. Neumann did it and he had several good assistants like pate and Spell. It is obvious that the dogs do not have a whole lot of talent, but you can overcome that through hard work and having football since. Those things can be taught. When you have a ton of penalties and are known around the area as playing dirty you want win many games. Also, you have to teach how to have success after several losing seasons. PNG doesn’t seem to have a problem with that. Why, because they hired a coach that believes in defense 1st and he has very good assistant coaches. Unfortunately Nederland does not! " It is obvious that the dogs do not have a whole lot of talent"...that's the dumbest comment you've ever made on here Quote
spidersal Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago So where is this talent that just gave up 33 points. If they had a little talent they would not have given up 33 points. So again if they have talent why are they play so poorly? Quote
AggiesAreWe Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 9 minutes ago, spidersal said: So where is this talent that just gave up 33 points. If they had a little talent they would not have given up 33 points. So again if they have talent why are they play so poorly? Because a team allowed 33 points that means they have no talent? So Newton, who gave up 44, has no talent? Palestine Westwood gave up 48, no talent? Lufkin gave up 59, no talent? Huntsville gave up 49, no talent? La Porte gave up 51, no talent? PN-G gave up 35, no talent? La Marque gave up 35, no talent? DeSoto gave up 38, no talent? Aledo gave up 28, no talent? Duncanville gave up 28, no talent? I could go on. It's pretty asinine to think that a team has no talent because they gave up 33 points in a football game. Particularly to a team that has a pretty good offense. Quote
WOSdrummer99 Posted 22 minutes ago Report Posted 22 minutes ago 8 hours ago, spidersal said: Why, because they hired a coach that believes in defense 1st and he has very good assistant coaches. Unfortunately Nederland does not! This was what turned things around here. Khelvy would still be running for 2k yards while we gave up... 48 Silsbee 58 Newton 49 Bellville 42, 44 La Vega 49 Carthage Only gave up 40+ 8x in previous 45 seasons btw. Im not being negative. Stating facts. Point is the staff can change philosophy and find traditional ways of winning again. Bashing "talentless" kids is worse than hating on coaches. It's not all about the "dudes" and they shouldn't be subject to that filth. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.