CardinalBacker Posted June 11, 2023 Report Posted June 11, 2023 All these clowns… they have no idea what they’re talking about, they just know for certain than trump didn’t do anything wrong. When faced with proof of criminal misdeeds, all they can say is “but what Biden, blah, blah, blah…” None of y’all can admit that Trump screwed up, even though Trump himself said “I screwed up.” You still won’t believe it. Quote
CardinalBacker Posted June 11, 2023 Report Posted June 11, 2023 On 6/11/2023 at 7:13 PM, Reagan said: President Trump was well within his rights to do what he did Under the "Presidential Records Act." He said it's funny in the indictment the Feds never mention this act! Imagine that! Clinton, Bush and Yobama did the same thing. NOTHING they've done to Trump has been true. So, I guess, why start now?! Oh, BTW, the classified papers that JoeBama has, he got them while he was VP which is highly illegal! Expand Go read the act. Let me know which part says it’s okay for the President to show top secret docs to reporters. Or the part where it’s okay to store them in a shower, or his personal residence. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up i mean… I see this: “Establishes that Presidential records automatically transfer into the legal custody of the Archivist as soon as the President leaves office.” Quote
baddog Posted June 11, 2023 Report Posted June 11, 2023 What about previous presidents who have documents at their houses? You’ll always get a whatabout from me because you are so disingenuous. Whatabouts get under the skin of fence riders and liberals due to their tunnel vision. Fence riders are liberals since they only attack those on the right. Reagan 1 Quote
Unwoke Posted June 11, 2023 Report Posted June 11, 2023 On 6/11/2023 at 8:03 PM, CardinalBacker said: Go read the act. Let me know which part says it’s okay for the President to show top secret docs to reporters. Or the part where it’s okay to store them in a shower, or his personal residence. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up i mean… I see this: “Establishes that Presidential records automatically transfer into the legal custody of the Archivist as soon as the President leaves office.” Expand To say Trump violated the Espionage Act is ridiculous and a super far reach. Lol. Lay off Hunters crackpipe. No one is saying Trump is perfect but we all know BS when we see it. Quote
BS Wildcats Posted June 11, 2023 Report Posted June 11, 2023 On 6/11/2023 at 6:54 PM, DonTheCon2024 said: Another day, another “what about” from the red hatters Expand When anyone points out the illegal deeds committed by biden, all you have is what about. Why is it that you feel the laws do not pertain to biden, or demoncrats in general? Y’all are so blinded by hate that you can’t see the forest for the trees. And a lot of what you fell for was concocted by clinton and obama. About as big of pieces of 💩, as biden. As a matter of fact, the Demoncrat party as a whole, are all pieces of 💩! Quote
BS Wildcats Posted June 11, 2023 Report Posted June 11, 2023 On 6/11/2023 at 7:13 PM, Reagan said: President Trump was well within his rights to do what he did Under the "Presidential Records Act." He said it's funny in the indictment the Feds never mention this act! Imagine that! Clinton, Bush and Yobama did the same thing. NOTHING they've done to Trump has been true. So, I guess, why start now?! Oh, BTW, the classified papers that JoeBama has, he got them while he was VP which is highly illegal! Expand They care nothing about the illegalities committed by biden, clinton, obama, Schiff, Pelosi, or any Demoncrat for that matter! Quote
UT alum Posted June 11, 2023 Author Report Posted June 11, 2023 On 6/11/2023 at 9:01 PM, Unwoke said: To say Trump violated the Espionage Act is ridiculous and a super far reach. Lol. Lay off Hunters crackpipe. No one is saying Trump is perfect but we all know BS when we see it. Expand Read Chapter 37, paragraph 793(c. of the Espionage Act of 1917. The reach is not far at all. Unwoke 1 Quote
UT alum Posted June 11, 2023 Author Report Posted June 11, 2023 On 6/11/2023 at 10:06 PM, BS Wildcats said: When anyone points out the illegal deeds committed by biden, all you have is what about. Why is it that you feel the laws do not pertain to biden, or demoncrats in general? Y’all are so blinded by hate that you can’t see the forest for the trees. And a lot of what you fell for was concocted by clinton and obama. About as big of pieces of 💩, as biden. As a matter of fact, the Demoncrat party as a whole, are all pieces of 💩! Expand Read Chapter 37, paragraph 793c. Evidence shows Trump might well have violated that act. Tell me any evidence anywhere that Joe Biden has done anything even vaguely approaching what trump is accused of by the United States. Unwoke 1 Quote
UT alum Posted June 11, 2023 Author Report Posted June 11, 2023 On 6/11/2023 at 10:06 PM, BS Wildcats said: When anyone points out the illegal deeds committed by biden, all you have is what about. Why is it that you feel the laws do not pertain to biden, or demoncrats in general? Y’all are so blinded by hate that you can’t see the forest for the trees. And a lot of what you fell for was concocted by clinton and obama. About as big of pieces of 💩, as biden. As a matter of fact, the Demoncrat party as a whole, are all pieces of 💩! Expand That is from the Espionage Act of 1917 Quote
BS Wildcats Posted June 12, 2023 Report Posted June 12, 2023 On 6/11/2023 at 11:54 PM, UT alum said: Read Chapter 37, paragraph 793c. Evidence shows Trump might well have violated that act. Tell me any evidence anywhere that Joe Biden has done anything even vaguely approaching what trump is accused of by the United States. Expand So you’re saying a little white lie is not really a lie? Supposedly there was enough evidence to impeach Trump, although everyone in the room knew full well it was made up crap from obama and clinton. biden was caught on tape blackmailing the Ukrainians, but there is no evidence? Carry on with your warped by TDS way of thinking. It’s a political witch hunt that most know is bull💩. Unwoke and Reagan 2 Quote
Unwoke Posted June 12, 2023 Report Posted June 12, 2023 On 6/11/2023 at 11:44 PM, UT alum said: Read Chapter 37, paragraph 793(c. of the Espionage Act of 1917. The reach is not far at all. Expand Did he try to sell documents?…nope, no proof of that. Did he destroy documents? Nope…no proof of that. Did he use the documents to endanger the country? Nope, all though he is the first president in many years that didn’t get us into a war. We do have a fake president that got us involved in a war in Ukraine and has erased our southern border intentionally which is treasonous in it self. Did he have possession of documents? Yes , Presidential Records Act provides that privilege. Have a Nice Day! Quote
Unwoke Posted June 12, 2023 Report Posted June 12, 2023 On 6/11/2023 at 11:54 PM, UT alum said: Read Chapter 37, paragraph 793c. Evidence shows Trump might well have violated that act. Tell me any evidence anywhere that Joe Biden has done anything even vaguely approaching what trump is accused of by the United States. Expand 😂🤣 Quote
Unwoke Posted June 12, 2023 Report Posted June 12, 2023 On 6/11/2023 at 11:44 PM, UT alum said: Read Chapter 37, paragraph 793(c. of the Espionage Act of 1917. The reach is not far at all. Expand 😂🤣 Quote
CardinalBacker Posted June 12, 2023 Report Posted June 12, 2023 On 6/12/2023 at 12:14 AM, Unwoke said: Did he try to sell documents?…nope, no proof of that. Did he destroy documents? Nope…no proof of that. Did he use the documents to endanger the country? Nope, all though he is the first president in many years that didn’t get us into a war. We do have a fake president that got us involved in a war in Ukraine and has erased our southern border intentionally which is treasonous in it self. Did he have possession of documents? Yes , Presidential Records Act provides that privilege. Have a Nice Day! Expand That is simply not true. Do you mind pointing out anywhere in the presidential records act where it says anything about a former president’s right to possess top secret and or classified documents? I’ll give you a hint-it doesn’t. I asked Reagan the same thing earlier (and even gave him a link to the document which he had obviously never read) and he disappeared, too. You won’t, because you can’t. Somebody else said it and since you agree with their misrepresentation, you started repeating it. The truth is that the Presidential Records Act says that all presidential records belong in the custody of the national Archivist when the president leaves office. I’ll be waiting. Quote
CardinalBacker Posted June 12, 2023 Report Posted June 12, 2023 On 6/12/2023 at 1:09 AM, CardinalBacker said: That is simply not true. Do you mind pointing out anywhere in the presidential records act where it says anything about a former president’s right to possess top secret and or classified documents? I’ll give you a hint-it doesn’t. I asked Reagan the same thing earlier (and even gave him a link to the document which he had obviously never read) and he disappeared, too. You won’t, because you can’t. Somebody else said it and since you agree with their misrepresentation, you started repeating it. The truth is that the Presidential Records Act says that all presidential records belong in the custody of the national Archivist when the president leaves office. I’ll be waiting. Expand Once smacked in the face with the truth about the Presidential Records Act, y’all will all start crying about how just illegally having (and hiding) those docs isn’t a violation of the Espionage Act. 37 counts, up to 536 years in federal prison, all of his attorneys quit because he screwed them over, too…. But at least the mouth breathers on the message boards still have trumps 6, lol. Quote
Unwoke Posted June 12, 2023 Report Posted June 12, 2023 On 6/12/2023 at 1:09 AM, CardinalBacker said: That is simply not true. Do you mind pointing out anywhere in the presidential records act where it says anything about a former president’s right to possess top secret and or classified documents? I’ll give you a hint-it doesn’t. I asked Reagan the same thing earlier (and even gave him a link to the document which he had obviously never read) and he disappeared, too. You won’t, because you can’t. Somebody else said it and since you agree with their misrepresentation, you started repeating it. The truth is that the Presidential Records Act says that all presidential records belong in the custody of the national Archivist when the president leaves office. I’ll be waiting. Expand Sorry but you can’t have it both ways when you look at Trump and previous Presidents possession of documents. He’s not above the law but he’s not below the law either. I know you’re excited because for about the umpteenth time you think they got Trump on some BS charge. Why aren’t you still harping on all the other BS charges that was brought against him an he was proven innocent. Oh that’s right this is a new one. Lol Your pathetic Quote
Unwoke Posted June 12, 2023 Report Posted June 12, 2023 On 6/12/2023 at 1:13 AM, CardinalBacker said: Once smacked in the face with the truth about the Presidential Records Act, y’all will all start crying about how just illegally having (and hiding) those docs isn’t a violation of the Espionage Act. 37 counts, up to 536 years in federal prison, all of his attorneys quit because he screwed them over, too…. But at least the mouth breathers on the message boards still have trumps 6, lol. Expand How hilarious it is to hear you say the word Truth when you’ve been wrong about every BS charge that has came against him. Lol Aren’t we Giddy?! 😂🤣 Get help. Quote
SmashMouth Posted June 12, 2023 Report Posted June 12, 2023 On 6/10/2023 at 4:54 PM, DonTheCon2024 said: Unwoke isn’t as dumb as he appears on here. Expand Wait, was that a compliment? 😂 Quote
Reagan Posted June 12, 2023 Report Posted June 12, 2023 On 6/12/2023 at 1:09 AM, CardinalBacker said: That is simply not true. Do you mind pointing out anywhere in the presidential records act where it says anything about a former president’s right to possess top secret and or classified documents? I’ll give you a hint-it doesn’t. I asked Reagan the same thing earlier (and even gave him a link to the document which he had obviously never read) and he disappeared, too. You won’t, because you can’t. Somebody else said it and since you agree with their misrepresentation, you started repeating it. The truth is that the Presidential Records Act says that all presidential records belong in the custody of the national Archivist when the president leaves office. I’ll be waiting. Expand I’m still here taking it all in. You’ll get a response. There’s more to this than meets the eye. CardinalBacker 1 Quote
Unwoke Posted June 12, 2023 Report Posted June 12, 2023 On 6/12/2023 at 1:36 AM, SmashMouth said: Wait, was that a compliment? 😂 Expand He’s just jealous of the money that I receive from a political organization for being on this political forum. 😂🤣 Cough Cough 😂 He’s very creative …Lol Quote
CardinalBacker Posted June 12, 2023 Report Posted June 12, 2023 On 6/12/2023 at 1:24 AM, Unwoke said: How hilarious it is to hear you say the word Truth when you’ve been wrong about every BS charge that has came against him. Lol Aren’t we Giddy?! 😂🤣 Get help. Expand Some are, some aren’t. I felt like the first impeachment was a sham. The second one had some credibility, although the timing was suspect-impeaching an outgoing President. … not surprised that the Republican Senate didn’t convict him. The first indictment in NYC is also a sham, IMO. The pending 1/6 federal investigation is a “maybe” in my book, but what’s going on in Georgia over claims he tried to interfere with the 2020 election is a legitimate problem. This one ( mir a lago docs) seemed a little witch huntish until they released the indictment. I think it’s got merit, IMO. I know it’s not popular to think for oneself around here, but I try. Quote
Unwoke Posted June 12, 2023 Report Posted June 12, 2023 On 6/12/2023 at 2:05 AM, CardinalBacker said: Some are, some aren’t. I felt like the first impeachment was a sham. The second one had some credibility, although the timing was suspect-impeaching an outgoing President. … not surprised that the Republican Senate didn’t convict him. The first indictment in NYC is also a sham, IMO. The pending 1/6 federal investigation is a “maybe” in my book, but what’s going on in Georgia over claims he tried to interfere with the 2020 election is a legitimate problem. This one ( mir a lago docs) seemed a little witch huntish until they released the indictment. I think it’s got merit, IMO. I know it’s not popular to think for oneself around here, but I try. Expand Quote
baddog Posted June 12, 2023 Report Posted June 12, 2023 On 6/12/2023 at 2:05 AM, CardinalBacker said: Some are, some aren’t. I felt like the first impeachment was a sham. The second one had some credibility, although the timing was suspect-impeaching an outgoing President. … not surprised that the Republican Senate didn’t convict him. The first indictment in NYC is also a sham, IMO. The pending 1/6 federal investigation is a “maybe” in my book, but what’s going on in Georgia over claims he tried to interfere with the 2020 election is a legitimate problem. This one ( mir a lago docs) seemed a little witch huntish until they released the indictment. I think it’s got merit, IMO. I know it’s not popular to think for oneself around here, but I try. Expand Man, talk about craw fishing. You never felt that way about any of it. 1/6 investigation is a “maybe”? OMG. Hindsight 20/20 taking effect. What a liar. Quote
CardinalBacker Posted June 12, 2023 Report Posted June 12, 2023 On 6/12/2023 at 11:10 AM, Unwoke said: 😎 Expand Which arrest was this? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.