Jump to content

Newton 20 West Orange-Stark 14/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

Whittington carried them

In all honesty, I am not from WOS but I do believe if you took away the weather in that playoff game, WOS beats Silsbee. I also feel strong about saying that they would have defeated Cuero as well. All in all I think weather like that made it a toss up for any 2 teams that night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SETXanalyst said:

In all honesty, I am not from WOS but I do believe if you took away the weather in that playoff game, WOS beats Silsbee. I also feel strong about saying that they would defeated Cuero as well. All in all I think weather like that made it a toss up for any 2 teams that night.

Didnt happen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SETXanalyst said:

In all honesty, I am not from WOS but I do believe if you took away the weather in that playoff game, WOS beats Silsbee. I also feel strong about saying that they would have defeated Cuero as well. All in all I think weather like that made it a toss up for any 2 teams that night.

That a touchy subject. Thanks but no thanks. Cuero with that guy was unstoppable. He ran over PG. One of the best 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SETXanalyst said:

In all honesty, I am not from WOS but I do believe if you took away the weather in that playoff game, WOS beats Silsbee. I also feel strong about saying that they would have defeated Cuero as well. All in all I think weather like that made it a toss up for any 2 teams that night.

No one was beating Whittington last year, regardless of the weather. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SETXanalyst said:

In all honesty, I am not from WOS but I do believe if you took away the weather in that playoff game, WOS beats Silsbee. I also feel strong about saying that they would have defeated Cuero as well. All in all I think weather like that made it a toss up for any 2 teams that night.

As much as I want to be a homer and agree with you, both teams played in that crap and Silsbee just strait up beat us. I was rooting for the Tigers to beat Cuero but man, Whittington was a beast. Would the match up have been better if WOS played Cuero? Maybe. But Silsbee earned the right to represent Reg 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, kicker 2.0 said:

As much as I want to be a homer and agree with you, both teams played in that crap and Silsbee just strait up beat us. I was rooting for the Tigers to beat Cuero but man, Whittington was a beast. Would the match up have been better if WOS played Cuero? Maybe. But Silsbee earned the right to represent Reg 3.

Worst part for us was holding him down for pretty much the whole game.  But then on that last drive he wasn’t going to be denied.  He orchestrated the whole drive, just wasn’t going to be denied.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...