Jump to content

Bridge City 12 Silsbee 2/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

The Silsbee Tigers continue District 22-4A play tonight as they host the Bridge City Cardinals!  Micheal Nelson's Tigers stand at 1-0 in district after besting Lumberton last Tuesday, 6-0.  Meanwhile, Chad Landry's Cardinals also stand at 1-0 after a 1-0 win over Hamshire-Fannett last Tuesday.

Join Tim Scoggins for all of the action from Tiger Diamond beginning with the pregame show at 6:45 followed by the first pitch at 7 by clicking on the following link:

This is the hidden content, please

Follow Silsbee Tiger Baseball on Your Source for Sports in Southeast Texas, SETXsports.com!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, due to circumstances beyond our control we will not be able to bring you the Bridge City/Silsbee game tonight.  We do apologize for any disconvenience.

Be sure to tune in Friday as the Tigers take on the West Orange-Stark Mustangs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WOSgrad said:

Unfortunately, due to circumstances beyond our control we will not be able to bring you the Bridge City/Silsbee game tonight.  We do apologize for any disconvenience.

Be sure to tune in Friday as the Tigers take on the West Orange-Stark Mustangs.

Headquarters, please disregard that last transmission.

The broadcast is back on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are a good team .. but defense for Silsbee is really struggling .. to many extra outs ... WAY TO MANY ..only showed 2 errors but it was a lot worse .. I’m a tiger all the way .. but defense has to clean up the mistakes or it will be a long rest of the season 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bridge City    200 036 1   12 9 3

Silsbee          010 100 0    2  3 2

Silsbee left to many runners in scoring position. BC blew it open in the sixth when Silsbee started bring in relief pitchers. Silsbee seemed to have played tight and gave BC too many extra outs, pass balls, and wild pitches, that wont help you win game especially against a team like BC. BC took advantage of Silsbee's mistakes. Silsbee gotta stay focus. TigerNation!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, STiger85 said:

Bridge City    200 036 1   12 9 3

Silsbee          010 100 0    2  3 2

Silsbee left to many runners in scoring position. BC blew it open in the sixth when Silsbee started bring in relief pitchers. Silsbee seemed to have played tight and gave BC too many extra outs, pass balls, and wild pitches, that wont help you win game especially against a team like BC. BC took advantage of Silsbee's mistakes. Silsbee gotta stay focus. TigerNation!!!

Yes to many pass balls , wild pitches ,missed communication.  missed played pop ups.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,953
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • No doubt. It's definitely intriguing enough to watch how this all plays out...
    • We all know that each state has its own laws which can be very different, especially in endeavors like annexation or incorporation, so there is no telling what Louisiana law says. I don’t know but I doubt that there is a point of appeal for Baton Rouge to force St. George to be absorbed back into Baton Rouge by now giving them what they asked for years ago. “Oh, we lost? Well let’s just undo incorporation, ruled as legal by the Supreme Court (of LA)  by going back and giving them what they asked for”. There has to be a law allowing such an appeal. I think what I read about the lower court decisions which actually backed up Baton Rouge, they did not all rule that incorporation was illegal but that they did not think the city could have services up and running soon enough. So you have a court saying that sure you can split but only if we agree that you can provide services get enough. In Louisiana, who knows? I doubt that Texas has such a mechanism to allow a city to split, for example, could the west end of Beaumont say that they wish to make their own city against Beaumont’s objection? I doubt it. Certainly Beaumont could allow a city to be created as Port Arthur did with Bridge City and Taylor’s Landing. There is a huge difference in allowing and forcing which is what happened in Baton Rouge. Similar to the sometime discussed topic of Texas splitting off from the United States because they don’t like the way things are going, think if citizens in any city in the United States were allowed to create their own city, which could not be stopped by the parent city.  That could get interesting!! Don't like what is happening in the south side of Chicago? Just de-annex and create your own city!! Anyway, I thought that it is an interesting story when the capital city splits in half.   
    • Wasn't that 1st round loss last year? Also, during those previous 10 years I am pretty sure Jasper didn't go 2-58 in district play in the other 5 sports.
    • Ma'am, I don't think he said all Muslims were like that. If I'm reading this right, he's referencing the terrorist Muslims. You know, the ones who commit murder & have no regard for anyone who doesn't follow their jihadist beliefs...
    • Great playoff run, no doubt.  They did make the 3rd round(1 less) 4 of the previous 10 years, only one first round loss. 6 district championships and 4 second place.  The only 4 years Carthage was in the same district. So no, I'm not sure it does make sense.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...