Jump to content

11-4A


LOLZ

District 11-4A Bridge City Huffman LCM Livingston Lumberton Splendora  

33 members have voted

  1. 1. Is there an easier district in all of 4a?

    • Yes
      11
    • No
      22


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

Well let’s just say the only thing Silsbee could do was throw the deep ball. They had 3 deep td passes, and one screen pass that went for a td with a questionable blocking in the back on our safety.

so we are vulnerable deep, but I think that’s because we were so focused on their run game because they hadn’t really thrown much all year.

Well I can tell you  Huffman will throw a lot more then us and they may give y’all problems in that air Raid offense they have. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LC-M said:

Well I can tell you  Huffman will throw a lot more then us and they may give y’all problems in that air Raid offense they have. 

That’s fine because we’ll have film on them. After watching 2 of the 3 Silsbee games before us I can tell you that their passing game was really nonexistent so we didn’t have anything to go off of.

But pass defense always seems to be our weakness. We don’t really have the speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Raiders94 said:

Yeah but I don't think they have 6'2" receivers with 40" verticals lol

No it’s not that. They just run a bunch of routes and always end up with a open receiver 40 yards down field lol hey y’all might do better with them. They have our number. If y’all can forced them to run the ball y’all win the game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LC-M said:

No it’s not that. They just run a bunch of routes and always end up with a open receiver 40 yards down field lol hey y’all might do better with them. They have our number. If y’all can forced them to run the ball y’all win the game

I don't think the Qb will have enough time to find an open receiver, I've seen film on them. lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Raiders94 said:

I don't think the Qb will have enough time to find an open receiver, I've seen film on them. lol 

I have not seen any film on them. But ill say this they are kinda like LCM and run the same offensive plays over and over again through the past years. I thought it was funny Kogt did a report at the start of the season and our head coach said yall were in the wing t he must not have seen any film on yall lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, LC-M said:

I have not seen any film on them. But ill say this they are kinda like LCM and run the same offensive plays over and over again through the past years. I thought it was funny Kogt did a report at the start of the season and our head coach said yall were in the wing t he must not have seen any film on yall lol

In his defense we did shift to the wing t on some plays, tried to switch things up some and keep people guessing. We found out in scrimmage that our wing t looked like garbage so we canned it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Raiders94 said:

I don't think the Qb will have enough time to find an open receiver, I've seen film on them. lol 

Lol you are probably right.. Honestly we should be 5-0 or at least 4-1, but our O cant stay on the field at crucial moments in games.. I've seen Lumberton in person and on film, and looks like it will be a good game with plenty of mistakes on both sides... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, BananaPants said:

Splendora 4-1

Huffman 2-3 

Lumberton 2-3

BC - 1-4*

LCM 1-4*

Livingston 0-5

*Played actual football teams (Jasper 5-0,Woodville 4-0, Diboll, 4-0 Vidor 3-1 (Lost to Crosby), Silsbee, and WOS)

10-20 as a district

Yeah.... I'd feel a lot better if BC or LCM had been competitive in those games.  4/5 will get sorted out next week when LiCk'eM travels to BC.  It's pretty much a "loser goes home" game regarding the playoff IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

Yeah.... I'd feel a lot better if BC or LCM had been competitive in those games.  4/5 will get sorted out next week when LiCk'eM travels to BC.  It's pretty much a "loser goes home" game regarding the playoff IMO.

Jasper 5-0 but really have they played anyone. Talk about easy non-district. 

Date Opponent Result
8/317:00p
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
Touchdowns Against Cancer Games
9/77:30p
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
9/147:30p
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
Little Cypress Mauriceville High School, Football
This is the hidden content, please
9/217:30p
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
Jasper High School, Football Stadium
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
9/287:30p
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please

I mean can’t get any easier than that!! So you can’t put them in the mix of “actual” football teams yet!!  But let’s not forget Lumberton played Jasper, Silsbee and I would bet Concordia would give most teams in this area fits. Not saying they had a great non-distict Schdule. Just stating the facts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, VP93.... said:

Jasper 5-0 but really have they played anyone. Talk about easy non-district. 

Date Opponent Result
8/317:00p
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
Touchdowns Against Cancer Games
9/77:30p
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
9/147:30p
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
Little Cypress Mauriceville High School, Football
This is the hidden content, please
9/217:30p
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
Jasper High School, Football Stadium
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
9/287:30p
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please

I mean can’t get any easier than that!! So you can’t put them in the mix of “actual” football teams yet!!  But let’s not forget Lumberton played Jasper, Silsbee and I would bet Concordia would give most teams in this area fits. Not saying they had a great non-distict Schdule. Just stating the facts. 

You make a good point....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

Yeah.... I'd feel a lot better if BC or LCM had been competitive in those games.  4/5 will get sorted out next week when LiCk'eM travels to BC.  It's pretty much a "loser goes home" game regarding the playoff IMO.

I have to agree with CardinalBacker, if the games would have been competitive then it would mean a lot more.  I still think a lot could happen in this district.  Huffman and Lumberton seem injury prone.  Splendora is a mystery to me.  They put up points and give up a lot of points.  BC and LCM could surprise some people, especially if LCM gets their QB back.  This district is wide open.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As of right now

1. Splendora 

2. Lumberton 

3. Huffman

4. Lcm

5. B.C.

6. Livingston 

Now what happens this week coming up will determine a lot.  If Huffman can put their BIG boy pants on for once and beat Lumberton,  I think we will win district.. But I'm very optimistic because I see the talent and what could be from this team.. Just we make alot of mistakes, and also See to many players, what looks like to me that are scared of full contact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined



  • Posts

    • It’s terrible no matter what happened. I am always concerned with the news media and social media outright lies or incorrect information that is put out, maybe in a rush to be first. Watching the video, it is easy to see that some of the earlier claims are simply nonsense. The officer might be cleared or he might face trial but we should be disgusted with the misinformation. Having been on scene or shortly after an officer involved shooting three times, I can say that some information that comes out is a complete fabrication. This is a horrible situation no matter who was at fault. I wish that the nonsensical false information would stop. That won’t happen…..  
    • Trump walks to the beat of a different drummer so he could very likely pick a person that is on no one’s radar. Going by typical political logic, assuming that a VP pick might bring 0.5%-1% votes, who should it be? A half to one percent is not much but in a potentially razor thin election, a couple of thousand votes in a state could decide the presidency. Biden won AZ by just over 10,000 votes. The most recent Beaumont mayoral election, where almost no one votes, had over 15,000 votes cast. In GA it was 12,000 votes and Biden did not even get 50%. In WI it was 20,000 and again Biden didn’t get to 50%.  There are other states in that area of percent point difference. How important? If any two AZ, GA and WI flip, Trump would have won. So while the VP probably never matters…. can it this time? I think that it could. What then does the VP pick bring to the table? FL and SC were both won by Trump in 2020 so a favored son vote for Rubio or Scott won’t help Trump. Both are in a fairly comfortable position within the conservative community so they will neither hurt nor help with strong conservative voters.  What about the few fence riders that could and likely will determine the election by either sticking with Biden or switching from the last election? What about the people who did not vote in the last election, but may come out to vote in this one just to support the VP candidate? Could Scott sway a percentage point or two from Black support? Could Rubio help draw a percentage point or two of Hispanic support? Possibly on both counts. Like I already mentioned, they won’t help in their own states because Trump already won those in 2020. I personally think that either would actually do a good job as president (although VP picks are about the politics of being elected and not the “best” possible president) and might be the difference in a few votes but a few votes more is all that is needed.  Or…. My outlier, Tulsi Gabbard.  She had some decent support when are ran for the presidency in the Democrat primary. Could some people follow her because they support her and not necessarily the party? I’m sure that’s true for all candidates. Could she bring female support? As a strong mentally and physically person and a member of the military who was deployed into a combat zone into Iraq. Then she went to OCS and became an officer, then deployed to Kuwait. Can that military history, including deployment into a war swing some votes? As of late, she has been on a one person tirade against Biden and the Democrats. Let’s remember that Ronald Reagan was a Democrat and so was Texas governor John Connally. Connally was not only a Democrat governor in Texas but also Secretary of the Navy under JFK. Both ended up switching to the Republican Party so there is a fairly strong history of former Democrats switching parties and being successful, all the way up to the presidency. Gabbard is a pretty fiery campaigner and doesn’t mince her words. She would really be a thorn in the Democrats’ hopes and has the inside knowledge of the party. Could she potentially swing more votes than Scott or Rubio? I think so. But…. I don’t think that Trump would pick her and I’m not sure that she would accept if offered. Her odds of being Trump's pick are at about 1%.  Scott or Rubio at about 10%. Trump being Trump, will choose someone who no one has ever heard of. 
    • So biden's a creepy old pedophile after all...shocker! But that's where the smart votes are landing.
    • 🤣🤣🤣  Right on schedule!!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...