Jump to content

Port Neches-Groves 72 Crosby 69/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, PNGNDN1990 said:

Roschon was amazing at defense maybe we can start playing him both ways along with some of the other offense like Hughes etc. our offense is amazing too bad we don't have the defense to go with it! Roschon has so much heart and talent! He is so much fun to watch when he jumps over people, pushes them out of his way! Amazing kid! 

Are you serious that you think y’all should play Roschon on defense?! Give that kid a rest, man!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, prepballfan said:

Number 16 will be a great player on defense as he gets a little older and faster. Jackson is his name. He is also a 10th grader

Tyler Jackson, #16, is a junior. He has always had a knack for finding the ball. He is a good kid and will be even better next year with the experience he got this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Coach85 said:

Tyler Jackson, #16, is a junior. He has always had a knack for finding the ball. He is a good kid and will be even better next year with the experience he got this year.

Ty thought he was one of the 9 Soph. He will be a great player next year. He is always around the ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CCRed said:

Crosby has quite a few starters returning on defense, 8 I believe, and it showed this year.  Offensively, the qb, a couple of linemen, and two starting receivers.  They should be fine next year.  

 

1 hour ago, prepballfan said:

Same here we have 5 10th graders starting on defense. 4 on offense.

And we might be in same district next year also

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, PNG Proud said:

Good to see you at the game!

 

Listening on the radio  probably didn’t do justice to Johnson’s performance he is a 1 in a generation athlete 

i don’t know how that speaks to PNGs ability to go deep in the playoffs 

I do know if #2 goes down nobody can take up his slack

with the exception of Ned he has had his way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Whoa said:

Listening on the radio  probably didn’t do justice to Johnson’s performance he is a 1 in a generation athlete 

i don’t know how that speaks to PNGs ability to go deep in the playoffs 

I do know if #2 goes down nobody can take up his slack

with the exception of Ned he has had his way. 

Even in that game he was unstoppable. Its just Nederlands offense was unstoppable as well with our D out there. Cant do it all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Brubaker said:

He was unstoppable running, but Nederland shut the pass down in the first half when they did attempt to be balanced.

 

I think Faircloth shut that down. You got to call the plays even if they don't work at first. The first sign of trouble and we went completely away from it. You have the #3 national dual threat against guys who won't be playing football in a few years.  But point taken.  The result was a L. Ned did what they had to do and it worked. Moving on to Texas City and good luck w Manvel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ROSCHONSBIGBRO said:

I think Faircloth shut that down. You got to call the plays even if they don't work at first. The first sign of trouble and we went completely away from it. You have the #3 national dual threat against guys who won't be playing football in a few years.  But point taken.  The result was a L. Ned did what they had to do and it worked. Moving on to ball and good luck w Manvel

I'm not taking anything away, but the play calling has got to be balanced as the season goes on and better defenses are faced.  You gotta trust one of the best HS QB's on the planet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, ROSCHONSBIGBRO said:

I think Faircloth shut that down. You got to call the plays even if they don't work at first. The first sign of trouble and we went completely away from it. You have the #3 national dual threat against guys who won't be playing football in a few years.  But point taken.  The result was a L. Ned did what they had to do and it worked. Moving on to Texas City and good luck w Manvel

Yep, only two passes to Stansbury the first half, both for about 9 yards....then nothing...Last night Stansbury tore it up...along with Riggs...Texas City D gonna be tough and our D, well we better find something. No sleep this week in trying figure it out...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,953
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • No doubt. It's definitely intriguing enough to watch how this all plays out...
    • We all know that each state has its own laws which can be very different, especially in endeavors like annexation or incorporation, so there is no telling what Louisiana law says. I don’t know but I doubt that there is a point of appeal for Baton Rouge to force St. George to be absorbed back into Baton Rouge by now giving them what they asked for years ago. “Oh, we lost? Well let’s just undo incorporation, ruled as legal by the Supreme Court (of LA)  by going back and giving them what they asked for”. There has to be a law allowing such an appeal. I think what I read about the lower court decisions which actually backed up Baton Rouge, they did not all rule that incorporation was illegal but that they did not think the city could have services up and running soon enough. So you have a court saying that sure you can split but only if we agree that you can provide services get enough. In Louisiana, who knows? I doubt that Texas has such a mechanism to allow a city to split, for example, could the west end of Beaumont say that they wish to make their own city against Beaumont’s objection? I doubt it. Certainly Beaumont could allow a city to be created as Port Arthur did with Bridge City and Taylor’s Landing. There is a huge difference in allowing and forcing which is what happened in Baton Rouge. Similar to the sometime discussed topic of Texas splitting off from the United States because they don’t like the way things are going, think if citizens in any city in the United States were allowed to create their own city, which could not be stopped by the parent city.  That could get interesting!! Don't like what is happening in the south side of Chicago? Just de-annex and create your own city!! Anyway, I thought that it is an interesting story when the capital city splits in half.   
    • Wasn't that 1st round loss last year? Also, during those previous 10 years I am pretty sure Jasper didn't go 2-58 in district play in the other 5 sports.
    • Ma'am, I don't think he said all Muslims were like that. If I'm reading this right, he's referencing the terrorist Muslims. You know, the ones who commit murder & have no regard for anyone who doesn't follow their jihadist beliefs...
    • Great playoff run, no doubt.  They did make the 3rd round(1 less) 4 of the previous 10 years, only one first round loss. 6 district championships and 4 second place.  The only 4 years Carthage was in the same district. So no, I'm not sure it does make sense.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...