Jump to content

NAACP Threatens Boycott if Kapertwit Not Signed


Hagar

Recommended Posts

37 minutes ago, new tobie said:

If Kapernick  kneeling  for the national anthem was that bad.  The north should have shoved a flag up Robert  E Lees arse for terrorist acts against Americans.

Couldn't find anyone bad enough to do it. You couldn't. Kap is a punk and a terrible QB. That's why no one wants him. Wahhhhhhh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colin Kaepernick is not on a roster because he is 3-16 over the last two seasons in games that he has started.  Yet he still believes that he deserves top 5 quarterback money and seems more intent on being an SJW rather than an NFL QB.

Not exactly the profile of a guy that you want to rush out and sign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, WOSgrad said:

Colin Kaepernick is not on a roster because he is 3-16 over the last two seasons in games that he has started.  Yet he still believes that he deserves top 5 quarterback money and seems more intent on being an SJW rather than an NFL QB.

Not exactly the profile of a guy that you want to rush out and sign.

But tobie would have you believe it's because he is black.  Maybe he should take a look at the whole picture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WOSgrad said:

Colin Kaepernick is not on a roster because he is 3-16 over the last two seasons in games that he has started.  Yet he still believes that he deserves top 5 quarterback money and seems more intent on being an SJW rather than an NFL QB.

Not exactly the profile of a guy that you want to rush out and sign.

AMEN- the risk/reward relationship is not very good.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, new tobie said:

If Kapernick  kneeling  for the national anthem was that bad.  The north should have shoved a flag up Robert  E Lees arse for terrorist acts against Americans.

Looking at it from our context, and 157 years later, what Lee and the Confederate Army did might seem like terrorist.  But as Englebert pointed out on another thread, if you understand what was at stake (and I don't mean slavery), it should give any reasonable person a better understanding.  At that time, the Federal Govt did little to interfere in what States did.  States ran themselves, be it good bad or whatever.  So you had the Feds all of a sudden telling these States what they could and couldn't do.  Lee, who didn't own slaves, fought for his state of Virginia, who had joined the Confederacy, as did virtually every other soldier.

Please realize I'm not trying to convert you to liking Gen Lee, just understand the reason why he reluctantly did what he felt he was obligated to do, fight for his State.  For him, and many others, the words duty and honor, were words to live by.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,963
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...