Jump to content

Strong close to losing Job??


D3zii

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, UTfanatic said:

I really believe that the overwhelming majority of Longhorns want Charlie to succeed!

I am not in the administration, so I can't speak for them! I think they do. 

Everyone looks and feels better when Texas wins. 

When I was younger, If Texas lost, best leave me alone until Monday or Tuesday. 

And look at me now!

horns up and Hookem 

Yea, It'll look bad before it looks good, Don't forget Strong was in a similar situation in Florida....In. 07 had one of the worst defenses probably not in the country but they were pretty bad with A young defense but in 08 you couldn't sniff the end zone against Florida 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UF went 9-4 in '07, after winning the MNC in '06 then did it again in '08.  Also, I'm tired of the youth excuses.  Tom Herman didn't need that excuse...Harbaugh didn't need it at UM...I could go on and on and on.  One of two things are going on here...either they recruited idiotic players (which I doubt our guys are that dumb), or they are continuously being out coached by the other sideline.  Me thinks the latter is more the fault than the former.  I just think at this point, he's so overwhelmed, he can't think straight.  That's leading to telegraphed defenses, which are being chewed up and spit out by the other teams.  At this point, I'm really starting to question the overall intelligence level at multiple facets of our coaching staff.

I don't think Strong taking over for Bedford is going to be the answer.  I sure hope I'm wrong...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, D3zii said:

lol I sware I was the same way, except it was a few yrs ago like when we lost to K-State in 06 I saw purple spots, and then in 08 when we lost to Tech I didn't know what to do with myself 

I was born in 1959.

The first time I ever perceived that TEXAS WAS going to lose, was in 2011 with Case at QB. Game was KSU and I just knew there no way to win. It took 52 yrs for this to happen the first time. 

Now it almost happens weekly.

 

Enough about fanatic 

Hookem

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Whoopi Goldberg's Lips said:

UF went 9-4 in '07, after winning the MNC in '06 then did it again in '08.  Also, I'm tired of the youth excuses.  Tom Herman didn't need that excuse...Harbaugh didn't need it at UM...I could go on and on and on.  One of two things are going on here...either they recruited idiotic players (which I doubt our guys are that dumb), or they are continuously being out coached by the other sideline.  Me thinks the latter is more the fault than the former.  I just think at this point, he's so overwhelmed, he can't think straight.  That's leading to telegraphed defenses, which are being chewed up and spit out by the other teams.  At this point, I'm really starting to question the overall intelligence level at multiple facets of our coaching staff.

I don't think Strong taking over for Bedford is going to be the answer.  I sure hope I'm wrong...

People really haven't been making excuses about youth, to be honest most have been saying this is no excuse, but your right , hopefully it isn't that we are getting out coached, an more so we just are having brain farts and aren't tackling worth a darn..(at least those can be fixed) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny, just a month ago it was Sumlin on the proverbial "hot seat" and the program looked to be in turmoil with 5star qb's leaving almost daily. Strong and horns appeared to be "back" with a win over what appeared to be a good ND team. All was good on the 40 acres. 30 days later, game day is in College Station and folks want Charlie gone. Someone said earlier they see tu getting 8 wins. Where? That means they need to go 7-1! Baylor, TCU, West Va, OU, Hell even Iowa St. looks decent. The ONLY guarantee is Kansas. Tu is more likely to go 1-7 than 7-1. Go Ahead and back the brinks truck up to the Herman household and hire him before LSU or USC does and don't dare let cougar high in the conference, because that is one more loss. Poor Texas. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Lukethadrifter said:

Funny, just a month ago it was Sumlin on the proverbial "hot seat" and the program looked to be in turmoil with 5star qb's leaving almost daily. Strong and horns appeared to be "back" with a win over what appeared to be a good ND team. All was good on the 40 acres. 30 days later, game day is in College Station and folks want Charlie gone. Someone said earlier they see tu getting 8 wins. Where? That means they need to go 7-1! Baylor, TCU, West Va, OU, Hell even Iowa St. looks decent. The ONLY guarantee is Kansas. Tu is more likely to go 1-7 than 7-1. Go Ahead and back the brinks truck up to the Herman household and hire him before LSU or USC does and don't dare let cougar high in the conference, because that is one more loss. Poor Texas. 

It's not like UT is losing to a bunch of scrubs.

Losing sucks, but let's be real.They have lost 2 games they could have and should have won. Not time to go Full Aggy yet.

If the defense does figure things out, they could win out. If not, they could lose every game and Chuck will be out.

It is what it is. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Lukethadrifter said:

Funny, just a month ago it was Sumlin on the proverbial "hot seat" and the program looked to be in turmoil with 5star qb's leaving almost daily. Strong and horns appeared to be "back" with a win over what appeared to be a good ND team. All was good on the 40 acres. 30 days later, game day is in College Station and folks want Charlie gone. Someone said earlier they see tu getting 8 wins. Where? That means they need to go 7-1! Baylor, TCU, West Va, OU, Hell even Iowa St. looks decent. The ONLY guarantee is Kansas. Tu is more likely to go 1-7 than 7-1. Go Ahead and back the brinks truck up to the Herman household and hire him before LSU or USC does and don't dare let cougar high in the conference, because that is one more loss. Poor Texas. 

Math clearly isn't your friend...7-1 gets us to 9-3, not 8-4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoopi, sorry my math was a little off, I was thinking 1-2, not 2-2. I forgot about the win over UTEP. I wasn't giving math lessons, just saying 8 is gonna be tough. The one good thing about their schedule is that they have TCU, Baylor, Iowa St, and WV at home. Tech, Kansas, K State on road and OU at Dallas this weekend. To me,Charlie has to win 6 of 8 to keep job. A win over OU would go a long way in job security. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Lukethadrifter said:

Whoopi, sorry my math was a little off, I was thinking 1-2, not 2-2. I forgot about the win over UTEP. I wasn't giving math lessons, just saying 8 is gonna be tough. The one good thing about their schedule is that they have TCU, Baylor, Iowa St, and WV at home. Tech, Kansas, K State on road and OU at Dallas this weekend. To me,Charlie has to win 6 of 8 to keep job. A win over OU would go a long way in job security. 

Just another PROUD aggy grad!

#btbb

Hookem

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Lukethadrifter said:

Whoopi, sorry my math was a little off, I was thinking 1-2, not 2-2. I forgot about the win over UTEP. I wasn't giving math lessons, just saying 8 is gonna be tough. The one good thing about their schedule is that they have TCU, Baylor, Iowa St, and WV at home. Tech, Kansas, K State on road and OU at Dallas this weekend. To me,Charlie has to win 6 of 8 to keep job. A win over OU would go a long way in job security. 

Total offense rankings-

Tech #1

Baylor #5

TCU #6

WV #20

OU #25

 

Charlie has his work cut out on defense.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PhatMack19 said:

Total offense rankings-

Tech #1

Baylor #5

TCU #6

WV #20

OU #25

 

Charlie has his work cut out on defense.  

 T

 

OTAL YARDS LEADERS

RK TEAM
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
1
This is the hidden content, please
2842 568 1391 278.2 1451 290.2 213 42.6
2
This is the hidden content, please
2818 564 1969 393.8 849 169.8 217 43.4
3
This is the hidden content, please
2657 664 2191 547.8 466 116.5 238 59.5
4
This is the hidden content, please
2422 484 1752 350.4 670 134.0 206 41.2
5
This is the hidden content, please
2069 517 1025 256.3 1044 261.0 165 41.3
6
This is the hidden content, please
2021 505 1272 318.0 749 187.3 116 29.0
7
This is the hidden content, please
1970 493 1175 293.8 795 198.8 158 39.5
8
This is the hidden content, please
1921 384 1215 243.0 706 141.2 129 25.8
9
This is the hidden content, please
1412 353 1048 262.0 364 91.0 102 25.5
10
This is the hidden content, please
1386 347 673 168.3 713 178.3 127 31.8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Lukethadrifter said:

Whoopi, sorry my math was a little off, I was thinking 1-2, not 2-2. I forgot about the win over UTEP. I wasn't giving math lessons, just saying 8 is gonna be tough. The one good thing about their schedule is that they have TCU, Baylor, Iowa St, and WV at home. Tech, Kansas, K State on road and OU at Dallas this weekend. To me,Charlie has to win 6 of 8 to keep job. A win over OU would go a long way in job security. 

Meh...I think the writings on the wall. Both, in regards to Charlie's employment status and your math skills! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GCMPats / Free BG said:

 T

 

OTAL YARDS LEADERS

RK TEAM
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
1
This is the hidden content, please
2842 568 1391 278.2 1451 290.2 213 42.6
2
This is the hidden content, please
2818 564 1969 393.8 849 169.8 217 43.4
3
This is the hidden content, please
2657 664 2191 547.8 466 116.5 238 59.5
4
This is the hidden content, please
2422 484 1752 350.4 670 134.0 206 41.2
5
This is the hidden content, please
2069 517 1025 256.3 1044 261.0 165 41.3
6
This is the hidden content, please
2021 505 1272 318.0 749 187.3 116 29.0
7
This is the hidden content, please
1970 493 1175 293.8 795 198.8 158 39.5
8
This is the hidden content, please
1921 384 1215 243.0 706 141.2 129 25.8
9
This is the hidden content, please
1412 353 1048 262.0 364 91.0 102 25.5
10
This is the hidden content, please
1386 347 673 168.3 713 178.3 127 31.8

Yards per game is what the NCAA uses to measure total offense.  Texas is 15th in the country offensively, but the problem is their defense is 87th in total defense and 116th in scoring defense 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, PhatMack19 said:

Yards per game is what the NCAA uses to measure total offense.  Texas is 15th in the country offensively, but the problem is their defense is 87th in total defense and 116th in scoring defense Clay Jennings, Vance Bedford, and Charlie Strong trying to be too cute on defensive scheme.

FIFY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Lukethadrifter said:

Whoopi, sorry my math was a little off, I was thinking 1-2, not 2-2. I forgot about the win over UTEP. I wasn't giving math lessons, just saying 8 is gonna be tough. The one good thing about their schedule is that they have TCU, Baylor, Iowa St, and WV at home. Tech, Kansas, K State on road and OU at Dallas this weekend. To me,Charlie has to win 6 of 8 to keep job. A win over OU would go a long way in job security. 

Only Six wins and Charlie is fired no questions, 7 wins and its up the air and he has to win the bowl game. 8 wins is the only way I see Charlie keeping his job for another year and still think the bowl game could make or break him depending the outcome of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined



  • Posts

    • It’s terrible no matter what happened. I am always concerned with the news media and social media outright lies or incorrect information that is put out, maybe in a rush to be first. Watching the video, it is easy to see that some of the earlier claims are simply nonsense. The officer might be cleared or he might face trial but we should be disgusted with the misinformation. Having been on scene or shortly after an officer involved shooting three times, I can say that some information that comes out is a complete fabrication. This is a horrible situation no matter who was at fault. I wish that the nonsensical false information would stop. That won’t happen…..  
    • Trump walks to the beat of a different drummer so he could very likely pick a person that is on no one’s radar. Going by typical political logic, assuming that a VP pick might bring 0.5%-1% votes, who should it be? A half to one percent is not much but in a potentially razor thin election, a couple of thousand votes in a state could decide the presidency. Biden won AZ by just over 10,000 votes. The most recent Beaumont mayoral election, where almost no one votes, had over 15,000 votes cast. In GA it was 12,000 votes and Biden did not even get 50%. In WI it was 20,000 and again Biden didn’t get to 50%.  There are other states in that area of percent point difference. How important? If any two AZ, GA and WI flip, Trump would have won. So while the VP probably never matters…. can it this time? I think that it could. What then does the VP pick bring to the table? FL and SC were both won by Trump in 2020 so a favored son vote for Rubio or Scott won’t help Trump. Both are in a fairly comfortable position within the conservative community so they will neither hurt nor help with strong conservative voters.  What about the few fence riders that could and likely will determine the election by either sticking with Biden or switching from the last election? What about the people who did not vote in the last election, but may come out to vote in this one just to support the VP candidate? Could Scott sway a percentage point or two from Black support? Could Rubio help draw a percentage point or two of Hispanic support? Possibly on both counts. Like I already mentioned, they won’t help in their own states because Trump already won those in 2020. I personally think that either would actually do a good job as president (although VP picks are about the politics of being elected and not the “best” possible president) and might be the difference in a few votes but a few votes more is all that is needed.  Or…. My outlier, Tulsi Gabbard.  She had some decent support when are ran for the presidency in the Democrat primary. Could some people follow her because they support her and not necessarily the party? I’m sure that’s true for all candidates. Could she bring female support? As a strong mentally and physically person and a member of the military who was deployed into a combat zone into Iraq. Then she went to OCS and became an officer, then deployed to Kuwait. Can that military history, including deployment into a war swing some votes? As of late, she has been on a one person tirade against Biden and the Democrats. Let’s remember that Ronald Reagan was a Democrat and so was Texas governor John Connally. Connally was not only a Democrat governor in Texas but also Secretary of the Navy under JFK. Both ended up switching to the Republican Party so there is a fairly strong history of former Democrats switching parties and being successful, all the way up to the presidency. Gabbard is a pretty fiery campaigner and doesn’t mince her words. She would really be a thorn in the Democrats’ hopes and has the inside knowledge of the party. Could she potentially swing more votes than Scott or Rubio? I think so. But…. I don’t think that Trump would pick her and I’m not sure that she would accept if offered. Her odds of being Trump's pick are at about 1%.  Scott or Rubio at about 10%. Trump being Trump, will choose someone who no one has ever heard of. 
    • So biden's a creepy old pedophile after all...shocker! But that's where the smart votes are landing.
    • 🤣🤣🤣  Right on schedule!!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...