Jump to content

Silsbee 76 Little Cypress-Mauriceville 31/Final


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

Score by quarters

                            1            2             3               4            tot

LC-M                 10            6           10               5            31

Silsbee                9          22           12             33            76

 

Team stats

FT %

LC-M               12/20         60%

Silsbee            15/32         47%

3 Point %

LC-M               1/12            8%

Silsbee            7/26           27%

Rebounding

LC-M                27

Silsbee            43

Turnovers

LC-M              35

Silsbee           18

Fouls

LC-M             26

Silsbee          21

 

Individual scoring

LC-M

Ayson Simmons                  10 (8 in 1st half)

Cameron Parker                  10 (5/8 FT)

Andrew Daspit                       4

Katon Brown                          3

Jordan Garcia                        2

Jacloven Provost                   2

Silsbee

Dontre Thomas                     12 ( 7 in 4th Q, 4/4 FT)

Jordyn Adams                       11 (9 in 4th Q, 4/4 FT, 1/8 three's)

Devon McCain                       10 (4/7 FT, 6 assists)

Rick Maze                               9 (3/8 three's)

Tre Grubbs                              8 (2/8 FT, 10 reb., 5 steals)

Trajan Harris                            6

Michael McCain                       6

Kalon Barnes                           5 (11 reb.)

Bruce Newton                          4

Adonis Thomas                       3

Kolten Mackey                        2

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Silsbee hit 4 three's in the 4th Q.

Devon McCain, Jordyn Adams and Dontre Thomas combined were 12/15 FT. The rest of team was 3/17.

 

As for the officials, they were the College Station Chapter. The tall official, who seemed to have a chip on his shoulder to start with, has done a Silsbee game in the past. He did the 1st playoff game against Yates. He seemed to officiate with an attitude of "don't ever question my call".

But, when you go outside for district games, you get what you get and sometimes that is the bottom of the barrel.

This chapter will officiate the next time Silsbee and LC-M play. Pretty sure it will not be the same three.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know I never really like to go to the "biased ref"and the foul numbers of this game were actually in the Tigers favor.  I really didn't have any problem with the other officials or some calls that I may not have agreed with but this ref did give me a feeling he was biased even before hearing we had seen him before.  Now if course I am a Tiger fan,. I don't know if a neutral fan would have had that feeling or not.  It didn't have any effect on the outcome so it isn't important now.  What is important is for our players to know this can happen and try to learn from it and try not to react in a way for this type of ref to have a chance to have a major effect on a closer game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think play calling was bad at times, but bad both ways too. 4 techs, 2 for each team so at least he was fair in that. The first tech in my opinion was much needed because out of three games I've watched Silsbee play, that particular player has played in two (the first one he was still playing football), but he has had a bad attitude and very mouthy in both games. And he almost was involved in a fight after the game was over last time I watched them. The second which I believe was on dontre, that was him just questioning the call, happens every game in all sports. That one shouldn't have been called.

this team to me does not look like a championship team for one reason: discipline. Or lack there of. Coach needs to get a handle on that. If he can instill some discipline into this team, then there's no reason why they shouldn't make a good run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, L-Train11 said:

I think play calling was bad at times, but bad both ways too. 4 techs, 2 for each team so at least he was fair in that. The first tech in my opinion was much needed because out of three games I've watched Silsbee play, that particular player has played in two (the first one he was still playing football), but he has had a bad attitude and very mouthy in both games. And he almost was involved in a fight after the game was over last time I watched them. The second which I believe was on dontre, that was him just questioning the call, happens every game in all sports. That one shouldn't have been called.

this team to me does not look like a championship team for one reason: discipline. Or lack there of. Coach needs to get a handle on that. If he can instill some discipline into this team, then there's no reason why they shouldn't make a good run.

The kid plays with more passion that anyone i have ever seen play the game. You do not find a player that puts defense first like this kid does. Bad attitude? One could say so. He needs to learn to stop talking to the refs... That is for sure. But he is very passionate about the game and winning. When you are 5'4 and 140 pounds (Guessing) you have to have a bit of cockiness and attitude towards the game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't part of that passion be learning to conduct oneself in a manner that is acceptable/comparable to others?  If you can learn to not travel or double dribble or how to defend or shoot, I am guessing it is less difficult to shut up.   By finding ways to justify questionable behavior, it seems to reinforce, ( to the offenders) that said behavior is acceptable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, L-Train11 said:

I think play calling was bad at times, but bad both ways too. 4 techs, 2 for each team so at least he was fair in that. The first tech in my opinion was much needed because out of three games I've watched Silsbee play, that particular player has played in two (the first one he was still playing football), but he has had a bad attitude and very mouthy in both games. And he almost was involved in a fight after the game was over last time I watched them. The second which I believe was on dontre, that was him just questioning the call, happens every game in all sports. That one shouldn't have been called.

this team to me does not look like a championship team for one reason: discipline. Or lack there of. Coach needs to get a handle on that. If he can instill some discipline into this team, then there's no reason why they shouldn't make a good run.

Not sure he called both the other techs.  But it was more than that as far as the techs, like I said I knew our first was warranted and the second was a case of saying too much when the tone was already set.  But I have never seen calls like a delay of game wrning for walking to the bench or some of the other issues he had.  From stories I have been told by some good sources there is more to the case on him.  I want say more than that just because I know nothing on it personally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BADSANTA said:

Nash, he plays with a lot of passion on the court but he can't control his mouth at times. Robot like no. Maybe stop talking to the red and complaining every game. Just go out and play hard. If your gonna complain, talk to your coach and let him do it for you. 

Well stated, sir.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Five players who have shown me the way to play...on the court because I don't see and hear all.

1) T. Grubbs (Senior)

2) R. Maze (Senior)

3) D. Thomas (Senior)

4) J. Adams (Freshman)

5) D. McCain (Freshman)

am I alone on this? Opinions?

Nothing against those not mentioned with good attitudes just as a lineup option.

Also, heard some rumors on grades.  This gonna effect Silsbee, again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, swamp123 said:

If your coach thinks every ref is against you why would a high school kid think or behave any differently?

Maybe there is some playing time frustration coming out? Depth, the luxory and the curse.

 

I have been to most games and have not noticed any signs of playing time frustration. The top 10 get plenty of time on the court. The other 2 players contribute when needed with no complaints. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,977
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined



  • Posts

    • No offense, but both sides do it.  The Rs in Texas want to do away with decades of precedent and demand that Dems are no longer given chair positions on any committees in the Tx House. It sounds reasonable enough, until you arrive at a point when the Ds enjoy a single seat majority in the house, select the most leftist speaker of all times, and the refuse to give Rs any say in the legislative process by refusing to give them any committee chairs.     Experience has shown me that any time a party seeks to consolidate power in a legislative body, it backfires.    What I don’t like is a world where we cheer for Manchin for doing his own thing, but also re-elect guys like Paxton and Patrick when they make threats to R Legislators if they don’t do exactly what the Radical Right demands. Our Rep here in Hardin County lost his spot for voting against private school vouchers-his wife is a teacher. He also voted his conscience on the Paxton impeachment.  It cost him his seat…. Not because of the will of the voters in his district, but because if millions of outside dollars pumped into the race from outside the district and even an endorsement of his unknown challenger by Donald Trump himself.    Why do people like you applaud Manchin for being his own man and then vote against Phelan for doing the same thing?
    • We'll see. I don't trust us. 
    • Starting pitching has been shaky the last few weeks due to some injuries outside of Hagen Smith.  He goes tomorrow, so y’all should be fine 
    • Manchin may get it but any mention of the radical left that wanted to get rid of the filibuster and end almost 220 years of history because the Democrats are mad?  The House and Senate are obviously different legislative bodies with entirely different election processes and rules for a reason. The House can vote on laws with a simple majority vote. The Senate put rules in place that it would make it much tougher to pass laws. Laws should be difficult to pass. The Senate is often the holdup of the right and left. It takes 60 votes to break the filibuster so any law will almost certainly require agreement at least in part, from opposing sides of an issue. Because they can’t get laws passed, the radical left is like a baby having a tantrum and wants to change over 200 years of history and make it potentially ridiculously easy to pass laws. I have seen current poll maps and it is possible for the Republicans to sweep into complete power in November but by the tiniest margin. That would possibly mean that a single vote margin in both houses could enact what you might call the radical right laws. There would be nothing that the Democrats could do to stop any legislation whatsoever if the left (they are all radical, minus Manchin) got their filibuster rule changed.  That is where the current filibuster comes into play as any new law would require several Democrats to agree with the majority Republicans and vice versa.  Do you want the potential for your radical right to have free rein as the radical left wants by killing the filibuster or is the radical left just as (if not more) dangerous? Let’s see if we have a history in this area? Oh yeah, the Democrats changed the rules in the Senate to allow federal judges to not have to overcome the filibuster. Obama was not getting his federal judge nominations passed and being angry, they changed the rules instead of nominating more moderate justices. They were warned that it would come back to bite them. They didn’t care and chose the nuclear option to change the rules. Oops! Any guess how Trump got all of his Supreme Court nominees passed against strong Democrat opposition? The Democrats got rid of the filibuster for federal judges after another tantrum   So when you are so worried about the radical right, are you equally concerned in what the radical left is always doing by changing rules and history which were put into place just for situations like we are in? So while Manchin gets it, what about his other 50 colleagues (49 + Harris)?  What concerns you more, Abbott and Paxton or the Democrats who want to make it to where if the Republicans do take over, they can go wild… at least in your mind? 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...