Jump to content

AP Week 10 State Polls

AggiesAreWe

By AggiesAreWe
in High School Football- 2014

 Share

Recommended Posts

AggiesAreWe

AggiesAreWe

Posted
Posted
Class 6A
School Total Points Prv
1. Allen (23) (8-0) 239 1
2. Southlake Carroll (8-0) 200 3
3. Pearland (9-0) 151 4
4. Manvel (1) (8-0) 146 5
5. Dallas Skyline (8-0) 135 6
6. Cedar Hill (7-1) 90 NR
7. SA Northside Brennan (8-0) 77 9
8. Euless Trinity (8-1) 76 7
9. DeSoto (1) (7-1) 70 2
10. Cibolo Steele (8-1) 59 8
Others receiving votes: 11, Denton Guyer 56. 12, Katy 39. 13, Hewitt Midway 19. 14, Amarillo 5. 14, The Woodlands 5. 16, SA Northside Brandeis 3. 17, Rockwall 2. 17, Round Rock 2. 19, Lake Travis 1.

Class 5A
School Total Points Prv
1. Aledo (22) (7-1) 244 1
2. Temple (7-1) 195 2
3. Fort Bend Ridge Point (1) (8-0) 188 3
4. Mansfield Timberview (1) (7-1) 174 4
5. Richmond George Ranch (1) (7-1) 127 6
6. CC Flour Bluff (8-0) 125 5
7. Ennis (6-2) 89 7(tie)
8. Fort Bend Elkins (7-1) 66 7(tie)
9. Houston King (8-0) 64 10
10. Tyler (7-2) 21 NR
Others receiving votes: 11, Canutillo 13. 12, Mesquite Poteet 11. 13, Crosby 10. 14, Boerne Champion 9. 15, Longview 8. 16, Richmond Foster 6. 16, FW Arlington Heights 6. 16, Cedar Park Vista Ridge 6. 19, Mercedes 4. 20, Lancaster 3. 20, Azle 3. 20, Georgetown East View 3.

Class 4A
School Total Points Prv
1. Navasota (20) (8-0) 243 1
2. Argyle (2) (8-0) 217 2
3. Gilmer (2) (8-0) 208 3
4. Kennedale (8-0) 162 4
5. La Grange (1) (9-0) 149 5
6. La Marque (8-1) 92 7
7. Van (8-0) 82 8
8. Gladewater (7-1) 73 9
9. La Vernia (7-1) 45 10
10. Sour Lake Hardin-Jefferson (8-0) 21 NR
Others receiving votes: 11, Stephenville 18. 12, Big Spring 17. 13, Sweetwater 11. 14, West Orange-Stark 9. 14, Graham 9. 16, Andrews 7. 17, Celina 5. 18, Huffman Hargrave 4. 19, Coldspring-Oakhurst 3.

Class 3A
School Total Points Prv
1. Cisco (23) (8-0) 244 1
2. Franklin (1) (7-0) 226 2
3. Wall (7-1) 189 5
4. Teague (1) (8-0) 178 6
5. Waskom (7-1) 128 8
6. Blanco (8-0) 113 9
7. Rockdale (7-1) 47 3
8. Malakoff (7-1) 36 7
9. Eastland (8-0) 35 NR
10. East Chambers (8-0) 33 NR
Others receiving votes: 11, Goliad 31. 12, Corrigan-Camden 26. 13, East Bernard 24. 14, Newton 20. 15, Kirbyville 17. 16, Pilot Point 9. 17, Coleman 7. 17, Spearman 7. 19, Buna 3. 20, Shallowater 1. 20, New Boston 1.

Class 2A
School Total Points Prv
1. Refugio (16) (8-0) 234 1
2. Mart (7) (8-0) 228 2
3. Canadian (8-0) 182 3
4. Bremond (1) (9-0) 167 4
5. Mason (1) (9-0) 147 5
6. Albany (8-0) 120 6
7. Alto (7-0) 105 8
8. Shiner (7-1) 68 9
9. Iraan (8-0) 54 10
10. Seagraves (8-0) 25 NR
Others receiving votes: 11, Crawford 16. 12, Shelbyville 13. 13, Booker 6. 14, Abernathy 5. 15, Hamlin 2. 15, Tenaha 2. 17, Gladewater Union Grove 1.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bullets13

bullets13

Posted
Posted

These poles are made on the bases of losses, i'm assuming instead of the quality of the opponents that teams play. I see some teams IMO that should be ranked higher and some lower, due to the level of competition they have played. HJ # 10 we WOS fans will not hear the end.HA HA. :lol:


Not from this one. I think both teams have earned a top-10 ranking based on their results this season.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GUNHO

GUNHO

Posted
Posted
 

These poles are made on the bases of losses, i'm assuming instead of the quality of the opponents that teams play. I see some teams IMO that should be ranked higher and some lower, due to the level of competition they have played. HJ # 10 we WOS fans will not hear the end.HA HA. :lol:


No way #5 through 10 could beat # 11 OR 12.Now # 14 might.lol
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dBerrySports

dBerrySports

Posted
Posted

 

No I don't.The Ville is just on another level.Defense might be suspect though.Big Spring put 60 something on them but they have a beast of an offense and Stephenville put up 50 something on them.

Well Stephenville's QB just had surgery after he got hurt on Friday. So unless their backup QB is something special too... I mean they did lose to Lubbock Cooper as well. Doesn't seem like they're on another level right now

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HJ2012

HJ2012

Posted
Posted

 

No I don't.The Ville is just on another level.Defense might be suspect though.Big Spring put 60 something on them but they have a beast of an offense and Stephenville put up 50 something on them.

La Grange seems to be on another level as well. You seem to think WO-S is up at this level, though?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • 72 Pinto
      Bridge City is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • bullets13
      Bridge City is open

      By bullets13 · Posted

      I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • Eagles12
      Bridge City is open

      By Eagles12 · Posted

      He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • 72 Pinto
      LC-M is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • 72 Pinto
      Bridge City is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...