Jump to content

Newton 44 Corrigan-Camden 26/Final


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

You are right EaglesFootball, Corrigan would see them(Franklin) in the(regionals) third round. If Corrigan wins out and we win out we would meet again in the quarterfinals,

I do not think Franklin is the monster that people seem to think they are. Another team that has played a weak schedule.

They beat

Rogers 37-7

Madisonville 59-31

Marlin 35-33 (3-4)

Buffalo 77-0 (1-7)

Hearne 61-0 (1-6)

I do not see Franklin beating Corrigan Camden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are right EaglesFootball, Corrigan would see them(Franklin) in the(regionals) third round. If Corrigan wins out and we win out we would meet again in the quarterfinals,
I do not think Franklin is the monster that people seem to think they are. Another team that has played a weak schedule.
They beat
Rogers 37-7
Madisonville 59-31
Marlin 35-33 (3-4)
Buffalo 77-0 (1-7)
Hearne 61-0 (1-6)
I do not see Franklin beating Corrigan Camden.

yall will probly play new waverly the first round and we will play jewitt leon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good job Newton on a big win. I will give credit where it is due. That defense is stout! I think if you take away 3 of the 4 turnovers it is a one score win for Newton. Corrigan finally started moving the ball after the half. Just costly fumbles let the game get out of hand. I think we can all agree corrigans defense stepped it up and made some key 4th down stops. I just Hope the defense continues to get better as we're gonna need it come November.

But again congrats to Newton. Take care of business and we Hope to see yall down the road.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newton's region is dist.9,10.11.12.

dist.11 plays dist. 12.

Probably Newton vs. N.Waverly (4-5)(3-2) (pts. for 209/ pts. against(193)

Corrigan Camden vs. Jewett Leon (6-2)(3-1) (201-125)

Crockett vs. Trinity (5-3)(4-1) (304-258)

Garrison vs. Franklin (7-0)(4-0) (375-71)

 

Dist. 10

Jarrell (7-1)(3-0) (315-175)

Rogers(6-2)(3-0) (166-130)

Dublin (4-4)(1-2) (230-188)

Clifton (3-5)(1-2) (188-253)

Marlin (3-5)(1-2) (172-268)

Bruceville E.(0-3)(3-5) (206-158)

 

Dist. 12

Franklin (7-0)(4-0) (375-71)

Trinity (5-3)(4-1) (304-258)

Jewett Leon (6-2)(3-1) (201-125)

N.Waverly(4-5)(3-2) (209-193)

Lexington (3-5)(2-2) (249-263)

Hearne (0-7)(0-4) (26-353)

Buffalo (1-8)(0-5) (145-406) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dist. 9
Palmer (6-2)(3-0) (220-202)
Maypearl (5-3) (3-0) (305-207)
Corsicana Mildred (2-5)(2-2) (142-244)
Rice (3-5)(1-2) (198-255)
Blooming Grove (4-4)(0-3) (344-196)
Rio Vista (0-8)(0-3) (53-313)

man Newton and corrigan should run through that like nothing! Only team on that list that is a threat is Franklin .. I bet we meet in the 4th round again
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't get ahead of yourself. I see Franklin in the regional finals. They are the epitome of a diciplined team. I know bulldog nation will swawk and lay an egg for someone suggesting such, but they are for real.

Extremely well coached, have tremendous tradition and are vey athletic.

But.....You never know. Newton could get beat the next two games......
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't get ahead of yourself. I see Franklin in the regional finals. They are the epitome of a diciplined team. I know bulldog nation will swawk and lay an egg for someone suggesting such, but they are for real.

Extremely well coached, have tremendous tradition and are vey athletic.

But.....You never know. Newton could get beat the next two games......

oh yes sir I know they are for real! Haha that's why I said they was a threat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't get ahead of yourself. I see Franklin in the regional finals. They are the epitome of a diciplined team. I know bulldog nation will swawk and lay an egg for someone suggesting such, but they are for real.

Extremely well coached, have tremendous tradition and are vey athletic.

But.....You never know. Newton could get beat the next two games......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined



  • Posts

    • High Point walks it off.  Vandy Whistler headed home!
    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
    • Wake is about to go from Preseason #1 to the 1st team eliminated 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...