Jump to content

mat

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,432

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

mat last won the day on April 26

mat had the most liked content!

Reputation

937 Excellent

See reputation activity

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1.    Mountain Goat reacted to a post in a topic: Tyler Chapel Hill 21 vs Bridge City 24— Final
  2.    CavemanFootballJunkie reacted to a post in a topic: Tyler Chapel Hill 21 vs Bridge City 24— Final
  3.    Orange County Baller reacted to a post in a topic: Tyler Chapel Hill 21 vs Bridge City 24— Final
  4.    TheMissingBand reacted to a post in a topic: Tyler Chapel Hill 21 vs Bridge City 24— Final
  5. mat
    I’m not a BC supporter but their program is improving each year regardless of the district. Great win. A lot of sour grapes around here.
  6. mat
    Does this mean we won’t got our $2000?😎
  7. mat
    They said three Kilgore players ejected
  8.    thetragichippy reacted to a post in a topic: H1B immigrants
  9.    Boyz N Da Hood reacted to a post in a topic: H1B immigrants
  10. mat
    I don't think Trump has ever said we don't need immigrants. He said we don't want illegal immigrants.
  11.    mat reacted to a post in a topic: "Tarriff dividend"
  12. mat
    I am anxious to see how the republicans make healthcare affordable to lower income people, ensure coverage for preexisting conditions, and get insurance, big pharma and the healthcare industry under control. Not holding my breath.
  13. mat
    Why are republicans not willing to even discuss any type of healthcare reform?
  14.    Boyz N Da Hood reacted to a post in a topic: "Tarriff dividend"
  15.    baddog reacted to a post in a topic: "Tarriff dividend"
  16. mat
    So you’ll refuse it?
  17.    Waterboys reacted to a post in a topic: BC/LCM watch scandal?
  18. mat
    Terrible situation for the program. Poor decisions were made. However the degree that they are being called terriblecheaters may be a bit much. It’s not like they orchestrated a cheating scheme. If you’re a coach and it’s game time and the opponents plays fall in your lap, how many would actually take the high road? I’m not defending their actions or justifying anything. Just saying. The ruling was just.
  19. mat
    We have two totally separate issues/concerns. 1) Restoring SNAP now for those truly in immediate need. 2) Revamping, scaling back, phasing out, or whatever other changes needs to happen afterwards.
  20.    LumRaiderFan reacted to a post in a topic: New York is circling the drain
  21. mat
    I agree, however I suspect it would result in another ban quickly.
  22. mat
    The committee reviewed evidence and made a ruling. One coach, one game suspension, no game forfeiture. I would not expect UIL to do any different. While circumstances may be more suspicious, there may not be enough evidence to rule differently. The assistant will take his one game suspension and move on with his career, possibly with more respect from some for taking one for the team.
  23.    mat reacted to a post in a topic: BC/LCM watch scandal?
  24.    mat reacted to a post in a topic: BC/LCM watch scandal?
  25. mat
    Pretty good one
  26. mat
    NY is celebrating
  27. mat
    Splitting hairs
  28. mat
    The committee investigated and made their decision. I accept that. This is a black eye on the LCM program even if the HC had no knowledge. While it’s a loss for BC, it’s also costing them a potential district championship. Any ongoing battles would probably be between district administrations rather than football programs. Next year will be a game to watch.
×
×
  • Create New...