Englebert

I expected nothing more from your little brain. Even Trump's worst tweets are more creative than your best stuff, but somehow you have the audacity to place yourself on a pedestal even above our founding fathers. The laughter is getting louder.

I would like that strategy better. He definitely needs to publicly air out a ton of the past regime's misdeeds. Though I wouldn't be upset if while doing this, he threw in a sophomoric jab here and there. I did not like these tweets (at all) by Trump. They were very childish with little imagination or creativity. If he is going to continue with stuff like this, either put more thought into them or hire a writer.

That's just your opinion. And based on your past posts, we all know what to think about your opinion. The laughter continues.

Normally I would hate stuff like this. But the Liberals have been using this disgusting strategy for a while now, and it's refreshing to see someone, even the President of the United States, giving them a taste of their own medicine. It's really hilarious to hear the snowflakes attempts at fighting back by saying, "He should be more presidential" or "this is beneath the office", etc. But they totally ignore when Democrat congressmen do the same thing. They also completely ignore when the media does the same thing, or even worse. So right now this is just comical to me and I encourage Trump to keep it up. I lost all respect for the office of the President when Obama came in and blamed everything on Bush, with no backlash from the ones complaining now. Karma.

Yes I do. Why don't you. Is it because you are confined to only hear what your Liberal brain will allow you to hear?

But you hold Rockefeller in such high regards. You seem obsessed with sexual mores as the sole indicator of a man's worth, except you childishly and pathetically weight this factor based on political affiliation. The Founding Fathers wrote a declaration under the threat of certain death if unsuccessful, and against overwhelming odds of success. They created a system of government unlike any governing body...with only faith that it would work. And you throw out adolescent quips and short-sighted theories, but somehow believe you are on equal footing with these geniuses. Will the laughter never stop.

Do you have a point or suggestion, or anything that remotely makes sense in this post? Speaking of fake news, did you hear Hillary, Schumer, and Elizabeth Warren spouting that people will die under the GOP healthcare plan? Is this fake news combined with blatant fear mongering? And did you hear many Liberals spouting 22 million people will lose their healthcare under the GOP plan? Is this also fake news combined with blatant fear mongering. Shouldn't they tell the truth and say that many people will lose their taxpayer funded subsidies, but are still free to purchase their own healthcare plan? And you say Trump lies. You only hear what you want to hear, and only see what you want to see. Too bad for you we can see what you refuse to see...thus the laughter continues.

You do know that Obama and Hillary each lost all of their elections in a huge landslide when counting land mass. The one with the most votes over a wider land mass carries as much weight as the popular vote. If I would have started using the Liberal argument strategy during Obama's reign I could still be crying about that fact, even though it would make me look foolish. And did you just state Bill didn't have the baggage that Hillary had? You are obsessed with Trump's locker room talk but somehow don't seem to care about Bill Clinton's sexual past, including multiple charges of rape. And you wonder why we all laugh at you.

Please look up these "lawsuits galore"...don't just blindly follow what your Liberal leaders have told you to believe. Do a little research and then let us know what you find. How many lawsuits were brought against him, and how many did he win? How many lawsuits did he file against others, and how many did he win? There is a reason the Liberal spin doctors dropped this topic in a hurry. You don't seem to have caught up yet.

The New York Times, now there is an unbiased bastion of truth tellers. If they were to publish a list of their lies the paper would contain more pages than War And Peace.

All I can say is WOW. This author could possibly be as unstable and paranoid as one could get. Reading this hit piece can only lead one to lean be thrusted towards the conclusion that the author is mentally deranged. But I, like normal people, would have to get more evidence or perform a more in-depth analysis to reach a conclusive diagnosis. Ooops, I forgot, I am still using the Liberal methodology of deeming myself with superior knowledge of mental insight as to the motive of this author. I can read one pathetic viewpoint, then conclude this author is totally evil and should be impeached from his profession. But yes, that is just my opinion and don't feel the need to iterate more on the subject. Unless Fee Dee would care to chime in, then I would gladly debate the merits or mental state of this author. That's just the civil thing to do.

All very sane and coherent tweets. Now the author's senility might be in question due to his comical and enormously exaggerated conclusion of Trump's mental state based on these tweets. Like any sane person, I would not venture to offer a clinical diagnosis based on such scant evidence, but that doesn't seem to stop the Liberals from doing it. And what's more hilarious is that some will even try to regurgitate the said fake news. The snowflake meltdown continues. I almost feel ashamed for the perpetual grin on my face since Trump won the Presidency.

I got through the first couple of minutes because Melania was the focus. After that I had to shut it down. And if you can't watch Ainsley for six minutes, well, I wouldn't know what to say. I'm guessing the common factor in our aversion to watching this video is not Melania, Ainsley, or FoxNews.

I'm not enamored or even impressed with your comprehension skills, so I don't consider that a compliment. And you need some semblance of content knowledge for the condescending attitude to be effective. Please outline your list of unusual behaviors. I would love to see what you consider proof of instability and paranoia. I would say I double-dare you but I don't want to sink into such childishness. Oh wait, I'm employing the Liberal form of engagement anyway...I double-dare you to reveal your true feelings and expose your analytical skills on diagnosing psychological disorders. I hope it is a lot better than the garbage you posted later in the thread. That one was just laughable.

Wow, I read the first two "lies", and frankly would be embarrassed to have my name on a post that had a link to that garbage. The first one: Sean Hannity actually showed a clip of Trump saying we shouldn't go into Iraq. This clip was shot before the invasion date. So your reporter lied. The second one: Trump said "I THINK we have the all-time record...", and your reporter calls that a lie. Trump didn't lie, he said what he thought to be true. A lie is when you say something you know to be untrue, such as "If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor" or "If you like your healthcare plan you can keep your healthcare plan". Such petulance is just absolutely pathetic, and your reporter seems to have a hard time telling the truth. The fact that you even put this link up for viewing shows your true character. And it's declining with every post.

Where in the video did he admit creating fake news? Please give me the timestamp, as I do not wish to sit through that whole thing.

How can we have a whole post about sunglasses without mentioning anything about my favorite kind, the kind ZZ Top devoted a whole song to....Cheap Sunglasses!

And this response typifies your limited knowledge and ability to analyze rational thought? Do you actually think that "the wall" and the travel ban are the be-all end-all methods that will solve all problems? Only someone that has very limited (and I'm being generous) cognitive skills could follow that line of thought. If you have bald tires on your vehicle, do you actually think buying a new set of tires will prevent all car accidents? Would you be out complaining...these new tires will not prevent a head-on collision, so I might as well just keep my old worn out tires? Thankfully that line of thinking has vacated the White House and now the adults are in charge.

That is pathetic. According to every psychologist and psychiatrist (and every other sane person), Gartner is a delusional nut-case if he thinks he can make a diagnosis like this. And you are not the only one that thinks something is wrong with the President. That is abundantly clear in the non-stop entertainment world of Liberal meltdowns. The problem is that when confronted to provide evidence for these delusional behaviors, y'all have nothing....just childish temper-tantrums. That is why I asked you to provide proof of your assertions that Trump was unstable and paranoid. And all you can come up with is "Trump accused Obama of wiretapping Trump Tower" or "I don't have to provide proof". It is clear for everyone to see you are being as petty as the rest of your party. I'm torn...while it's very sad it's just darn comical at the same time. The once mighty Democrat party that championed themselves as the party for common folk, has sunken to the depths of petty temper-tantrums, hissy fits, and safe spaces filled with crayons and Play-doh. And for what? You tell me who is paranoid and delusional.

I guess we'll have to wait for the Liberal responses until their leaders can formulate a response. I'm sure it will contain the terms "fake news", "witch hunt", "collusion", and/or "Russian interference"

Who are these uneducated folks you speak of? Who do you think started the phase? And when? And better yet, why?

So when people call Trump an orange, paranoid, unbalanced, racist, homophobic, idiotic, mentally disturbed, incompetent, misogynist, deplorable, liar, stooge, Putin love child, xenophobic, adulterer, etc., and someone asks for proof of these claims, you take that to mean we are defending him? And who has defended him when he has been wrong? Please give an example of this (even though history has shown you won't defend your comments).

I'll go back an look, but paranoid was one. There were many others. You Liberals are so in lock step with the talking points it's hard to remember. And thanks for the compliment. Your analysis so far has been completely and utterly ridiculous to the point that I would feel any praise by you would be worrisome.

I think that study was conducted by Captain Obvious. And Seattle can't say they weren't warned. I'm guessing their elitist mentality got in the way of good judgement, which often seems to be the case with Liberals.

Your earlier statements on this subject said that Trump was a supreme racist for even suggesting this executive order...or did you forget.