Englebert

TCU leads A&M 4-1 after 7. Sorry, didn't see your post.

TCU leads A&M 4-1 after 6.

TCU leads A&M 4-0 after 5.

TCU leads A&M 4-0 after 4.

TCU leads A&M 4-0 after 3.

TCU up 1-0 after 2. 6 of the first 7 batters down on strikes for A&M.

Why did you name Gingrich?

Yes, those Democrats are hypocrites. How dare they plan a bill in total secret, lock out all Republicans, trade kickbacks and favors for votes, then demand the Republicans be completely open, transparent, and inclusive when they are in power. Sounds just like when the hypocrites screamed about the nuclear option when they were the first to use it. You are totally correct new tobie, the Democrats couldn't be bigger hypocrites. And guess what, Schumer said he and the Democrats would obstruct the Republicans in every way. Wasn't it you that was adamant and very vocal about your opposition to such tactics when the Republicans were blocking Obama. Are you now going to whine like a little baby that's just had his candy stolen?

You have a strange little mind. The selective outrage is fascinating, and comical. The lack of shame is just indescribable.

If you can't figure out "what your dealing with" by the posts, then you have a whole other issue that you need to deal with on a personal level. And if you need personal information to debate, well, you can't debate. The topic is obvious, and it's obvious you want to use the personal information for personal attacks. Looney Liberals have been employing this strategy for awhile now. It's pretty clear you are in need of the obligatory pat on the head with the mutterance "bless your little heart".

That's what stupid people say when encountering something beyond their comprehension. I bet you've employed the old standard "but he's book smart" defense mechanism on multiple occasions haven't you.

You need to look up the definition of deflecting. You are the one that "deflected" by asking Baddog where he worked. That has nothing to do with the debate, but your feeble mind is so confused right now all you can do is try to go on the offensive of personal attacks. It's an old worn out strategy that most people just laugh off and mutter "bless his little heart", but I will drop down into the gutter with you. Since I've been employing the Liberal strategy of debate, "that's just my game". Pick a topic and start a new thread.

Why you are asking personal questions instead of staying on topic. It is a very simple concept that only Liberals have such trouble understanding.

My bad, I didn't realize my post was beyond your comprehension. Try reading it a few more times, and if you are still having trouble I will try to dumb it down. But you have to make an effort.

That's the true sign of a Liberal that's lost it. You are trying to gather information for personal attacks when you realize you can't debate on facts. This is just so sad.

Response to what? Put down the vodka! (And yes, that is an exclamation point purposely added.)

Important enough that Harry Reid, you know, the former Senate Majority leader, went after the name using his bully pulpit with threatening consequences. It is hilarious that the Supreme Court, with four very Liberal judges, shot down the Patent Office's, with Harry Reid's full support, unbelievable facists attempt to dictact their insanely skewed and sanctimonious Liberal agenda on the American people. Even the Liberal judges had to shoot down the former Senate Majority leader and his ilk with a score of 8-0 unanimous decision. Speaking of Reid's ilk, it looks like there's room for one more.

This coming from someone who put stock in polls and now wants to deflect by saying different polls have different results. Just stop. The laughter can't be controlled much longer. You are rapidly sliding into the looney, safe space, Play-doh, coloring book mentality.

I don't know. Why did Obama try to ban FoxNews from his briefings? Why did Obama spy on AP reporters, and spy on FoxNews' James Rosen and his family? You didn't seem outraged about that, but you seem to be impersonating a looney Liberal by getting all huffy-puffy about something that is not even close to what you should have been livid about. In your own words...just stop already. You are starting to show your true colors, which is actually coming as a big surprise to me.

Does that poll still have Hillary leading by double-digit figures? (I know, I know, I've used that line before, but it so dang-gum appropriate.)

I would love for Greg Abbott, or anyone really, to tell the NFL to shove their bid where the sun don't shine, then go to a state where they can choose what bathroom to use in order to remove it.

Same thing happened to me.

With absolutely no shame in showing it.

But way, way more intelligent than you. So where does that leave you on the intelligence scale? And it was predictable you would have no comment on the topic. Do you feel like a man when you throw out insults about someone that is your superior in every way? Is it due to some form of inferiority complex?

Rick Perry is skeptical about how much impact Man has on Global Warming theory. Finally, an adult in the room. Here's an article, though it is not worth reading: [Hidden Content]