Englebert

I would vote no on the Bill. The reason, and I would shout it from the rooftops, is that I don't feel Congressmen should be carving out special privileges for themselves. We have enough of that already. If they feel a gun will protect them, then that logic should extend to the common people also. What's good for the goose... I think everyone should be afforded their 2nd amendment rights, not just a privileged few, therefore the Bill should allow everyone to carry guns.

It would have to compete with the 24 hour comedy network that is MSNBC. The childish, immature behaviors and emotional meltdowns are hilarious.

We've already found the true liars, and it isn't Trump or his administration.

That article was written by a clueless liar. And you fell for it. Most people would be ashamed at themselves for being that gullible.

The media unloaded on Sarah Palin for having an illustration that contained crosshairs. The sentiment of the illustration was the "targeting" of many Democrat congressional districts, one of which was Gifford's district. Many, not a few, many Liberal pundits considered this causal actions of the shooting on the part of Palin, and some were actually calling for her arrest. It's was really ironic when FoxNews and some other sane outlets posted these same type of pictures with crosshairs that were created by Democrats. This didn't stop the full on assault of Palin and her inciteful rhetoric. The double standards are clear and obvious for anyone with at least two functioning brain cells.

What congressional or government job should Newt Gingrich retire from? Add that to the long list of your lies that far exceeds Trumps misstatements. You lie on a daily basis. I know it's not really a lie, but you previously posted a link that attributed a list of misstatements by Trump that were classified as lies. If you are going to use that standard, you must admit that you are a habitual liar.

Is a background check for the purpose of identification? People will say that it aides in investigations, but is that the purpose of background checks? Isn't the whole purpose to determine who is qualified to own a gun? If you say that it's to help in identification then we might as well have a full blown gun registration.

No he didn't. That is just what your Liberal leaders are feeding you, and it makes you look like a complete fool. MSNBC has done some kind of number on you. If you want to debate what Trump actually said, then let's go. But you will run and hide only to spout your hateful rhetoric at a later date. Name one person that believes most Muslims are terrorists. (Ooops, caught you in another lie.) Why would Trump focus on White nationalists? Just because the Liberal nut-cases tell you to hate White people, doesn't mean sane people should give any credence to such non-sense. Again, your Liberal leaders are making you look like a fool.

Only a short-sighted imbecile full of hate and self-delusions of moral superiority would make a statement like that. And I bet you believe ISIS is the JV who just needs a hug and a job. -Donald J. Trump

Who is the idiot? You can't give examples of idiotic behavior, but somehow feel you're intellectually superior. Please give some policy examples that you feel deem Trump an idiot. We can then debate on your analytical skills and come to a consensus on the true idiot.

At least he is not distorting facts and all sense of reality to form that opinion. Can't say that for everyone. And I bet BS Wildcats would even defend his opinion. Again, can't say that for everyone. And why did you preface your statement with "Get over yourself!"? Is that your distorted heightened intellectual superiority and self-awareness debilitation seeping out again.

Please enlighten us with a detailed description of why you think Trump is the impetus for the hateful environment. You analytical skills and view of reality are a sight to behold. Please grace us with your morally superior intelligence. Everyone with two functioning brain cells can see the hate coming from the Liberals, but somehow you manage to distort that to actually blame the Republicans. Please teach us how you can do that. I would love to live a life in which I can just blame all of my problems on someone else and distort facts to maintain a heightened sense of morally and superiority. I'm guessing the key is to harbor as much hate as possible, then use the distorted facts as a defense mechanism to mask that hate.

That is a complete lie. When Gabby Giffords was shot the Liberal MSM blamed the Republicans, especially Sarah Palin. You have a very short and peculiar memory. How you can distort facts just to keep your preconceived notions intact is baffling. It would be one thing if you just distorted facts, but you distort the facts into blaming people you don't like. Nobody was acting like Giffords did something wrong and got what she deserved. That is just the hate oozing from you pours, distorting your brain. Makes us wonder what part of your body you pull "facts" from.

How long do you think it will be before you start reading about terrorism in the local newspapers? And I curious at to how you can read a newspaper with your head buried in the sand. Now that is some feat.

Is that you Big Girl? I never expected a more mature answer. History is just repeating itself. But somehow you will return with a condescending and morally superior attitude after posting all of these childish and immature posts. Tell us again how racist and incompassionate we are, and how we hate the poor and want to see them die in the street. These analytical deductions are coming from someone who can only muster a "smmfh" response. And somehow we are the idiots.

I like the fact that it will soon be a thing of the past. Why do you preface your posts by laughing at people then proceed to write sentences that are laughable? Be honest.

I'm fairly certain it's poor you if you put any stock in polls. How did that poll fair during the elections? Is Hillary still currently leading Trump by 10pts in your poll?

The former regime lied more, but you gave them a pass. It is because of the political affiliation or the skin color, or both?

I don't know? Is a 10pt lead going into election day good?

You started this by saying we didn't know what the article was saying, prefaced with a LOL. I asked you to clarify what we missed, and you failed miserably. I can only assume you are employing the Liberal tactic of deflection instead of contrition. That's the lesser used tactic of Liberals when self-grandiose positions come crashing down. Normally it is personal attacks.

I read the first paragraph, and part of the second, but will go no further. The holier than thou attitude expressed on his own flawed premise leads me to believe no further reading is necessary. If there is a salient point in this post that you would like to discuss, I will go back and read it (although it might be hard to concentrate over the laughter). But I'm sure you will forego any discussion and run from this article.

That article is worse than westend1's link. Do Liberals have a contest to see who can write the most imbecilic posts? Just like in the post westend1 linked to, the author is showing his lack of intelligence by trying to point out someone else's lack of intelligence. And y'all have the audacity to spread the stupidity. And as always, I will back up my contentions in a discussion about this article with you, but as history has shown you will run and hide as fast as you can.

Like the poll you posted. Is Hillary still up 10pts in your poll?

So what is your question? Why is an article posted about climate change on Mars under the title "Mars is going through climate change"...is that really your question?

Yes, the connection is both planets have naturally occurring climate change. You are the one that needs to stop trying to ridicule people that are pointing out that simple concept. Your are interjecting things not said...things that reside in your head and projected onto the rest of us. That's what deserves the LOL.