Englebert

Please enlightened us as to what you find delusional. And don't forget to include some of Big Girls and new tobies posts. In fact, that's probably your only material.

They only thing I learned from that link is you have a problem discerning truthful, legitimate and/or relevant information from biased propaganda...then again, I already knew that.

Did you hear what sounded like a jumbo jet go straight over your head?

I'll defend the Nazis. As I'm sure the other five will also. We are all card-carrying skinheads that want to torture, rape, brutalize then kill every Black, Jew, Mexican, Hispanic, Muslim, non-Christian in the world...including their pets. We think every non-White is a subhuman and unfit to walk in our shadows, and are deserving of death in the most unimaginably cruel fashion. It doesn't matter what I or others write, that is what you will believe. It is frightfully easy to see from your posts.

You might want to ask someone to analyze your posts. Pick any third grader...they will readily see your flawed thought processes and have better insight as to how you might improve on your ability to comprehend the posts on this site. Frankly, I hope you keep posting. Since we can't have real discussions on here, at least you can entertain us.

Maybe he should call it "workplace violence". Well, since it wasn't at "work" (these were not paid rioters), maybe he should just label it a "vehicular incident". You know, attempt to minimize the situation as performed on multiple occasions by the previous administration. If you are angry at Trump for waiting two days to repeat his denouncement, surely you are livid at Obama. Or is it you only pick and choose which facts to weigh based on political affiliation. I would ask you to give a response but we all know how that will go.

Everybody on this board has seen repeatedly your analytical skills. You support whatever your Liberal nut-cases tell you to believe, and you invent "facts" to substantiate your misguided beliefs. Your attempts to label me and others are just so ridiculous and hilarious.

Are you saying you support the suppression of free speech?

Such fake outrage. You are so transparent even 3rd graders can see right through you. And the hypocrisy is just unbelievable.

Do you actually feel competent enough to evaluate who are racist? If so, why? Please enlighten us with your criteria as to who is deserving of your racist moniker. Can you name a single Conservative that you feel is not racist? You've ran from every other question posed to you, so I'm sure you will do the same for these.

I'm right there with you on some of these. I'm pissed that he hasn't persuaded Congress to repeal Obamacare. I'm even more pissed about him pushing replacement of Obamacare. I'm also pissed he hasn't called for a special prosecutor for Hillary. But I'm so overjoyed that Hillary is not occupying the White House. That would be a disaster. Trump has done some very good things, and has appointed some very good people. But the best thing he has done is to be non-PC, which allows the Liberals to show their true hateful colors. The fake outrage is so very comical, and it clearly illustrates the bias in the media. Obama did/said many of the same things, and worse, but was given a pass on everything. The MSM would holler for days if Trump said he ate a hamburger and it turned out to be a cheeseburger. (Thank you Nash for that one...I had to steal it.)

Lufkin and McAllister Park met in the second round. If I'm not mistaken, both pitched their aces in their first game (I know Lufkin did). These pitchers were not available again until the finals. The Lufkin ace had 14 strikeouts in Lufkin's first game. I don't know how many he had in the finals against McAllister Park, but he pitched a very good game...as did the McAllister Park pitcher.

In that case, Trump gets full credit for our upgraded military despite the attempts to apply Liberal logic. Obama's legacy is not something he or anyone should talk about without hanging their head in shame. Taps would almost be the appropriate background music anytime his legacy is the topic of focus, except Taps should only be played when showing respect.

No, no, no...and no. You stated previously that what was accomplished during an administration but was started in a previous administration, then the previous administration gets the credit. Just like a Liberal to take credit for other's deeds, picking and choosing which traits are noteworthy based solely on political affiliation. How you people sleep at night is mind boggling.

If Obamacare was so popular Trump would have never been elected. Obamacare has never had over a 50% approval rating in any major poll. (Even Trump has been over 50% in most polls at some time.) And I really do hope you realize that the ACA, the (Un)Affordable Care Act, and Obamacare are all the same thing. They all have the moniker of being the worst legislation in American history. Too bad we have 47% of the population who don't pay their fair share of taxes but demand the other half pay from cradle to grave. What a utopia this world has become when one can demand others pay for their care, and scream like little dependent children when someone suggests they must pay their own way.

How does Obamacare fair in that poll? What about Hillary...is she still leading by double digit points? And thanks for the laugh with that oxymoron. It's been a while since anyone has had the audacity to use "fair and equal" to describe a Progressive, even though the label was self-described through the eyes of a liberal.

So George Bush got Bin Laden. Is that what you are saying?

I agree, that is more than enough reason to start secession proceedings. I'm fairly certain the Liberals still want to move toward Socialism even after witnessing the damage an extreme ideologue can do to the country in just 8 years.

You never answered the question as to why you think many posters left this forum. You would think we would get plenty of posters on here anxious to read the intellectually uplifting quips from new tobie. You would also guess that many posters would be chomping at the bit to debate/refute the many "far Right wing nut" links (as interpreted by the unbiased, all-inclusive, morally and intellectually superior free-thinkers who comically refer to themselves as Progressive Liberals). And according to many on here, the Conservative posters outnumber the Liberal posters 50 to 1, and use this (false) majority to suppress the Liberals posters through unmitigated and swarming personal attacks. And, according to many, the links highlighting biased, far-Right blowhards should be condemned by everyone, while in the same topic the collective intellectual and extremely unbiased "moderates" highlighted are beyond reproach...and unfounded dissension to these links is just a sign of the unenlightened pack mentality of the deplorables beyond the scope of refute or acknowledgement. Furthermore, any and all ridicule of acts by the current President are acceptable, while the same or worse acts of the past President are completely off-limits and any comparisons are unfair and completely out-of-bounds. And, along those same lines, any personal attacks on the current President reflect an accurate description of his mental state while like attacks on the former President are performed by blind, biased, racist, hateful sycophants and should be prohibited by law. Did I adequately explain why so many posters seem to refrain from voicing their opinions on this forum?

Your fake outrage is comical.

I watched a documentary on the "Wrecking Crew", who were a group of studio musicians in Los Angeles. I was surprised to find out Glen Campbell was a member. I was then shocked to find out that Campbell was the tour replacement for Brian Wilson of the Beach Boys, after Wilson was no longer able to tour.

Why do you seem to be obsessed with polling numbers...well, only polls that fit your agenda. If a warden is doing a good job running a prison, what do you think a poll of the inmates would look like?

Did you actually just try to demean Reagan by accusing him of posting looney biased links? This coming in the same post in which you include a looney biased link? Keep this up and your credibility will sink to ...well, I'll just leave it there.

That emphatically illustrates you don't understand my statement at all. I expected at least a little comprehension, but apparently I was wrong.

I wasn't changing the subject, just illustrating the point that Liberals try to rewrite history in their own sick and distorted way. The topic was and still is about jobs, and we are now reminded and acutely aware that Liberals tend to skew history. I'm surprised with your intellectual superiority you wasn't able to deduce this. Can I get a LOL?