Englebert

No wonder you don't protest a judge's racist opinion of you (see other thread)...you have no clue when you are being insulted...but instead focus on imagined and false narratives that can only be dreamed up by a simpleton. And I think you are just parroting this diatribe of fictional vitriol (meaning I don't think you possess the skill set to reach simpleton level).

I meant it's baffling why minorities seem to not be offended and propelled to speak out against these type of blatantly racist decisions. I have absolutely no doubt that you are correct in concluding the judge understands the people in question will vote democrat, and her reasoning for that decision is about as racist as anyone can get. Even Robert E. Lee would be thinking "Man, that judge is racist".

I'm guessing (no sarcasm at all) that many/most folks 50 to 100 years from now will look upon us as dirty, crude, ignorant, sickening simpletons that actually slaughtered and ate animals. Our time will be judged as the dark, dark ages when man murdered animals for fun. If anyone wants a statue of themselves to still be standing in the future, you better become Vegan real quick. We will be judged by futuristic standards, as we are judging historical people according to our present standards.

I keep wondering why minorities, especially Blacks, are not outraged by these types of decisions. The judge is basically saying that she thinks Blacks (and Hispanics) are too stupid to obtain an ID. Many of you keep trying to find and protest non-examples of racism...then you have a prime example of racism right here and you say nothing. That is just baffling.

I expected nothing more in regards to a response of yours. You keep showing your hateful colors though, just like the good little sheeple you are. Get caught in a lie and simply lob personal attacks instead of admitting you were wrong. Those Liberal leaders have sure did a number on you.

But yet it still happens. And many of the Liberal folks eat it up like candy. And what's funny is that if you try to point out the fabrications, you get labeled as a Trump supporter, a "Trumptard", and many despicable descriptions. It seems the Liberals have decreed that you have to walk in a regimental lock-step with their warped way of thinking lest be branded as one of their many ridiculous monikers. And please provide links to some of the videos of Trump making a fool of himself. I've seen a few, but have also witnessed misinterpretations and severely biased analysis so often that it makes me wonder just how hilariously low the Liberals can go with these distortions and fabrications. It's usually comical to see what Liberals consider "abnormal" or unpresidential behavior (if we can even get an example), especially in the context of the previous eight years.

Here's my thoughts: You lie. When did Trump ever state he would pay for his own protection? Please show some evidence. More thoughts: [Hidden Content] From the article: Later Monday morning, Alles told CNN in a statement that the problem isn’t just related to the Trump administration and has been going on for many years. “This issue is not one that can be attributed to the current administration’s protection requirements but, rather, has been an ongoing issue for nearly a decade due to an overall increase in operational tempo,” he said in the statement.

How is this description any different than the neo-Nazi or White supremacists you so abhor?

If this was directed at me, you missed my point entirely. We (anti-Socialists) are not the ones that nit-picked Obama for 8 years. We had very, very legitimate gripes. Your side is the carrier of the nit-picking torch. Example: One of Trump's biggest and most deceitful lies was that he said he had the biggest inauguration, or his golf handicap. I point out that Obama destroyed our healthcare system and weaponized the I.R.S. and get labeled a racist. And it seems, even though in jest, you've joined the ranks of ones that have all-of-a-sudden opened their eyes after being shut for 8 years, and can see deep into a man's soul just by viewing a simple photo with narration by wing-nut Socialist Liberals ate up with TDS. I point out legitimate disagreements with the previous administration and get branded a alt-Right, neo-nazi, hateful, spiteful, racist, homophobe, deplorable,... There is absolutely no way I could have said anything negative against Obama, even in jest, without being on the receiving end of these monikers. So, even in jest on my part, I pointed that out. And the response is I need to lighten up and you are taking your football and going home. I'm afraid the "lightening up" is not something I'm in need of.

Now this is funny. We have the best hope of the Left now caving to the pathetic nut-wing Liberal disease by taking an innocuous photo and exaggerating it to a mental disease. This would be semi-okay if the rage would have also emanated from past transgressions of the office, but to equate a person looking towards the sun as a mental disease is not only stretching, it is really disgraceful. And before you reply, think about this. If I would espouse derision towards Obama for doing something similar, I would be excoriated to no end as petty, or hateful, to racist. So you don't get a pass...I'm a full circuit critic. You might have said it in jest, but I would not be afforded the same courtesy.

So you can't answer a question a 2nd grader could answer. Typical and expected.

Do you think the vandals voted for Trump or Hillary?

Is it your point that the Left is not contributing their fair share to this forum?

I'm guessing this is an example of Westend's plea for intelligent debate. Should we not attempt a response to this garbage or reply and be labeled as childish mud-slingers and hate-mongers. Is this the type of post that anyone, Left or Right, feel is a contribution to the debate forum that many of us would like to have? As long as these type of posts are not condemned, I feel like in-kind responses are the only resort. What say you Westend? Any ideas on how to respond to this senselessness? And feel free to discuss which posts you think are similar that should be condemned by everyone. I would love to discuss the merits of posts from the Right versus posts from the Left.

If REBgp uses my same categories to describe people on the Left, then his quote is absolutely correct. I label the nut-case socialists, exclusionists, hate-mongering, race-baiters as Liberals, and the sane but misguided people that prefer a bigger government as Democrats. I would not put you in my Liberal category. But I'll let REBgp respond.

Do you really feel competent making psychological assessments based on board participation? Really? Do you? At least your posts have entertainment value.

I can't believe FoxNews would even consider including an article that relies on "stats" from the Southern Poverty Law Center.

I'm with Nash. How did it sound to you?

I noticed these broad strokes...but these were/are being lobbed by the Liberals on this board. I initially tried to debate. Then attempted to just asking for evidence to support these unsubstantiated allegations. Finally, and reluctantly, resorted to using the same despicable tactics in retaliation. You could probably have a debate with anyone on this site from the Right, but try having a debate with the Liberal posters on here. If you think anyone on the Right is using unjust broad strokes, ask them to defend their opinion, and you will get an answer. Ask anyone on the Left, and you will get crickets, only to see the same vile being spewed at a later time. The evidence is abundant and overwhelming. You haven't posted much on this forum so I'm not putting you in their category. In fact, I have no doubt I could have a congenial debate with you. I'll throw Westend in there also because I believe I can (and had a few) adult debates with him. (Although I think he frequently uses the Liberal tactic of diving into the mud at times...as do I.) But try having any debate above a 3rd grade level with anyone else on the Left and it will devolve into childishness in less than two posts. I see absolutely no equivalency, just retaliation using like tactics. If you would like to debate on which side has degraded this forum into childish mudslinging, I will gleefully accept that challenge. I can pick one poster and have enough smut to overwhelm your evidence 10 fold.

Do you think 2 degrees from Texas A&M qualifies as an inferior education?

I'm guessing many don't vote. But for the ones that do, I would guess Trump for the sole reason that the Left's platform (but not practiced) is total inclusion, which is definitely not a selling point for them. They are as exclusionary as the Leftist, but they admit it. Like I said previously, I have no idea what the economic values are for these guys and don't know if that even factors into their decisions. I'm fairly certain they were not happy with either candidate, as was most of the country, but for different reasons.

I think they align with the Left point of view way more than they align with the Right point of view...both want total control. But they differ extremely on who should be the elitists/favored. And I think that was what the post was alluding to. I actually have no idea what the economic values are of the Nazis, KKK, etc (small vs big government).

You don't have to go to the video...we have examples on this board (but from the other side). I'm curious as to who you think is indoctrinating the people on the video. Do you think they are rabid Fox News viewers? Or maybe rabid MSNBC viewers? Do you fault the educational system (K-12, College, College Graduate School)? Do you fault Trump or Obama? And what percentage of people do you think on the Right are indoctrinated versus the the percentage of people on the Left that are indoctrinated?

They sound like Muslim jihadists. And we all know it is absolutely forbidden to equate those extremists with real Muslims. Why is there no crossover equivalency with that line of thinking?

We don't watch CNN.