Englebert

I know this question is way, way, way too far in advance of an election, but I'm bored and saw this topic. I started pondering on how both sides would react. The main problem is that I don't know any of Oprah's political views or positions on...well, anything. Until we know these things, this question is just silly to even pose. But I'm curious as to what your initial reactions are if this scenario was to come to fruition. I'm guessing that Democrats will vote for Oprah in overwhelming fashion, and the Republicans will vote for Trump in overwhelming fashion, per usual. The undefinable Independents is a totally mystery. What effect will the media have with their all-out negative assault on Trump? What affect will the economy have on the outcome, especially if the economy is in great shape?

[Hidden Content] Who would have guessed that the next presidential race might come down to two celebrities. If this happens, I'm curious as to what will become of all of the anti-Trump people who admonished the Trump supporters for voting for a man with no political experience. I'm guessing they will attempt to use the race and gender card to reconcile their blatant hypocrisy. What do y'all think? If the election was being held this year (based on the state of the U.S.), who do you think would win?

She was found safe: [Hidden Content] Not much detail in the article though.

Haven't you embarrassed yourself enough?

Maybe you should try to get your money back. The last time you tried this tactic it blew up in your face. Of all of the people on this board that actually have a college degree, yours seems to be the least discernible. Your professors are undoubtedly hiding in shame...knowing that their job was to teach you how to think for yourself instead of worshiping at the altar of the Liberal loons. Then again, they might be grinning from ear to ear in the knowledge that you're a shining example of their indoctrination. And I find it funny that I used the term "monolithic" a while back, and you were pretty upset with my post. You actually thought it was a negative stereotype. Now you use the term in practically every post, and on many occasions incorrectly, but have the audacity to (attempt to) deride others in childlike fashion. Your intellectual prowess is in dire need of some refining...or existence. Luckily you've figured out the art of "cut and paste". The formatting still seems to be a challenge for you.

It sure is ironic. This is the whole philosophy of the so-called and hilariously labeled "deniers". Too bad this philosophy is taken to heart instead of the worshipping at the feet of those who proclaim "the debate is over".

This video clip would be pretty funny if used at the right time. Using it to respond to a coherent and on-point post renders the response as completely out-of-touch and a parody of itself. I might steal it and use it when appropriate though.

I second that. I might venture to say the funniest post of the decade. And if you, Big Girl, want to hold an intellectual conversation, please pick a topic. I suggest we debate on the difference between debt and deficit.

I'm in a pretty good mood after last night's game. It would have been a lot sweeter if the opponent would have been one of the other former Big12 teams (and I'm not referring to Nebraska or Colorado). Too bad the SEC is too scared to even dare allow that matchup. If you don't feel like "debating" right now, this post should get PhatMack on the warpath. Oh wait, this is the political forum...he and I are on the same side. I'm not venturing to the College section. Y'all are brutal over there.

Wow, have the Libs did a number on you. Would you care to backup your statements? (It took me 10 minutes to type that sentence. Have you ever tried to type while laughing hysterically. It is not easy.) And this statement is coming from someone that exposed her lack of knowledge between debt and deficit. Are we somehow supposed to think of you as knowledgeable on the subject of deficits now?

This coming from a science denier. Classic!

Do you get the same gut-wrenching chuckles every time you read some Man-Made Global Warming nazi writing about Polar bears starving due to MMGW? What about the nutcases that attribute every weather pattern to MMGW? What about every photo of Earth's ever changing scenery attributed to MMGW? There are many more instances of these, which should keep you in stitches for the rest of your life.

The Man-Made Global Warming nazis have managed to convince people you can have your cake and eat it too. It's too hot outside - Man-Made Global Warming It's too cold outside - Man-Made Global Warming It's a very mild winter - Man-Made Global Warming It's a very harsh winter - Man-Made Global Warming The hurricane season was almost as bad as the 1930s - Man-Made Global Warming Hillary lost the election - Man-Made Global Warming Does that about sum it up?

And?

And I'm sure you will be too scared to comment on the content, but add your obligatory "LOL", then later accuse the Right of posting stuff with no comment. Oh yeah, and claim that the posters on the Right are responsible for running off posters, while claiming zero responsibility due to your well-informed, thoughtful, knowledgeable, and just downright enlightened posts. And I'm sure you will resort to one or two personal attacks, then chastise any posters from the Right for responding with personal attacks. And I'm sure you will have no comment about posters who use the race card in an attempt to shut down a debate. Yep, we know the routine. It's odd that you post condescending predictions when your own posts are so, so predictable.

Maybe it is you. A link will be posted and you will respond with "LOL" or "that is just a far left website not to be trusted" with no argument of the content. You then continually complain about people not giving commentary and just bashing other posters, while calling other posters names. And to top it off, you blame the Right for running off posters. When challenged on why, you just say "I don't know", but continually point solely to the Right. Then you have the gall to make condescending posts about the very things you are guilty of. I think we have found our answer. It is undoubtedly you that ran them off. Or do you think some might have gotten tired of the "grab'em" and "you are all just racist" posts? I will blame the whole Left, including you. After all, I am a genius. Right?

And the response from the Left is not a discussion of how the link is wrong. The only response we get is "y'all are just racist". That deserves the "ha", or better yet, your obligatory "LOL" only comments. Your continual blaming of the Right for running off posters is baffling, considering the mound of evidence of "enlightened" responses from Left.

No, it's "let's learn from history and not follow the same failed policies". And you want to blame "Pubes" for running off posters. Remind me again who needs to wake up.

Do you actually think Hippy and others were "ran off" because of posts like Baddogs? You don't think it was the continual posts like "grab'em" and "you are all just ignorant racists"? Do you think we can't have a decent conversation on here because of the ones on the Right? Who is the one that needs to wake up? Do you think the quality of posts on this forum has gone up or down since many on the Left have chosen to abstain?

I wasn't expecting anything, so anything given is a bonus. And if Hillary would have won, more of my money would be gone. So I'm enjoying the idea of a flourishing economy versus anything the Left does to stifle it. It might not look like a big difference to you, but the effects have enormous repercussions. Unfortunately, as history has shown, we will get tired of winning and eventually the sheeple will be successful in electing Liberals back into a position of power. That will be the time to worry.

I think the Republicans are "freaking out" because of the total hypocrisy shown by the Left. I recall, and I'm sure you do to, how the Left passed a bill without reading it, and with zero bipartisan support. Now the Left is loudly and publicly complaining about not being able to read the bill, a bill in which they refused to participate in the process, thus ensuring it would not be bipartisan. I for one am very glad the Left refused to participate. The only thing their participation would accomplish would be to hold things up. It's hard to work on a problem when you are constantly laughing at the proposals from the other side. And I find it extremely ironic that the Left is all-of-a-sudden worried about the national debt, or that the middle class won't see a tax cut (which looks to be a lie). The Left had full control 8 years ago and never once proposed a tax cut for the middle class, and now seem to be falsely saddened that a tax cut is not forthcoming (again, a lie). I'm sure the Left would have voted for this bill if a larger middle class tax cut was included. Now that is sarcasm! On a serious note, Nancy Pelosi actually said that this was the worst bill to ever be proposed in the House. And she said it with a straight face. I literally did the proverbial LOL. I'm giving full credit to Trump for the ridiculous comments emanating from the Left. The meltdown continues, and the American people are the benefactors.

I think that is what most of us "deniers" are saying. Let's figure this thing out before committing a whole lot of money that might or might not be useful. The problem is when we say things like this, we get labeled with all kinds of cute little words that are in no way flattering. In fact, some are trying to make us into criminals just for asking obvious questions. I have read many stories of people losing their job for having the audacity to simply question the MMGW theory. Skepticism is the driving force of science, but the MMGW nazis want to stifle any modicum of perceived dissent, and simple little questions definitely qualify in their minds.

Should we spend trillions of dollars trying to reverse or even change a natural part of life? If so, would these trillions spent make one iota of a difference? Should we study the cause and effect of such efforts before throwing money at a theorized solution to a problem that is not even defined? Oh wait, I can't ask these questions. The science is settled and I should just hand over my wallet and go live with the Amish.

Who is the Aggie? Don't you dare put that moniker on me.

What numbers about the economy were false under Obama? The fact that the United States received it's first ever credit downgrade? The fact that Obama was the first president to never achieve 3% GDP growth rate. The fact that we are now $20,000,000,000,000.00 in debt (that is a lot of zeros). Which economy numbers are you referring to as false?