Englebert

And furthermore, given the fact that many more unborn lives have been taken due to unwanted teen pregnancies than "assault weapons", what should the age of consent be for people engaging in the act of procreation? Does sex education help with this issue? Liberals think this subject should be taken from the parents and taught in the classroom. Why is "sensible" gun ownership not taught in the classroom?

And furthermore, given that stats show many more teen lives are taken due to car accidents than "assault weapons", what should the age be for someone to have the privilege to own and/or operate these killing machines? Based on last weekend's revelations, I'm still stuck on 35.

And furthermore, many of these mentally challenged excrements have stated that they need to be protected from tools that have the capability of slaughtering them. Well, stats show that many, many, many (can't have too many "manys" in this sentence) more youth are killed by texting than by "assault guns". Given that absolute fact, and given the fact that these morons feel that we should raise the age for possession of tools of death, shouldn't we raise the age of owning a smart phone to 35? What do y'all think the mentally developed age to safely own a smart phone should be?

After listening to the mentally stunted youth speak about how the constitution is outdated and is in need of change, I find myself in total agreement with that assessment. When the constitution was written, most people 18 years old were married, with a child or two, and had life and survival skills foreign to todays peers. Based on that, the constitutional elders determined that an 18 year old was mature enough to vote for their representative. I find that no longer the case. This is backed up by the Liberals who insist that 18 year olds are too immature to exercise their 2nd amendment rights. So I feel it is time to change the voting age to 35. What do y'all think? What should the voting age be?

If a reporter writes an article discounting the Man-Made Global Warming Theory, would this be considered "fake news"? Banning "fake news" is just a different way of advocating for censorship. If censorship is the solution (and it never is), who gets to decide what is fake? Who gets to decide who to appoint to decide what is fake? Who gets to decide who can appoint? And so on, and so on.

So any weapon that holds 16 bullets is a killing machine that should be banned. All others are legal. Yeah, that will solve the problem. What crystal ball do you are anyone own that can predict who will go into a school and randomly shoot innocent children, or predict who will kill anyone? Where is this technology? Who has this ability? Oh yeah, that only exists in fantasyland. Who gets to decide who is mentally impaired? It's a serious topic in which you have no clue and probably should not be part of the discussion. Luckily for you this is America and you can't be banned from discussing on a subject, no matter how short-sided, immature, and deficient in common sense your rationale may be. Instead of focusing on the mental health of gun owners, maybe we should concentrate on changing the laws for those who abuse the first amendment?

I literally pulled a LOL when I heard this moron speak. I don't remember what station I was watching, but the lead-in stated that this guy was the face of the movement and that his statements are "going viral". So I stayed tuned to see what he had to say. If I was his dad I could emphatically state that this would be the most embarrassing day of my life...that a child I raised could be so immature. I guess I would remind him of why he is not allowed to vote.

Please explain your definition of an "assault gun". Then please explain your definition of a "mentally impaired" person. I bet you won't...because once you try to define your stereotypical generalizations, your asinine, short-sighted and mentally stunted definitions will then be open to ridicule by those possessing more than two functioning brain cells. So please, give your best "old college try" at a pathetic rationalization for such a pathetic statement so we can bask in amusement of your feeble mindedness when assessing a subject you have clearly given zero original thought. You seem (from past posts) to have the answers to question that us peons cannot fathom, and yet you articulate these revelations in condescending fashion...but somehow and mysteriously proffer such an immature statement. Shouldn't these two things be the ones that should be kept apart? I bet you run. Let's make this easy on you. A new law is passed that bans assault weapons and bans mentally impaired persons from owning a firearm. The Police Chief holds a meeting to inform his officers of the new law. One officer asks what qualifies as an assault weapon. Another officer inquires as to who qualifies as a mentally impaired person. You are the Police Chief. How do you respond?

Yes it does. Trump should be ashamed, as much as the swamp should be ashamed. He's proven himself as part of the problem. All of the good things he has done does not make up for this very poor decision, no matter how much he tries to flower his reasoning. Putting a pinch of sugar on a pile of crap does not make the crap any more palatable. And this spending bill is one big load, and I've only seen the highlights. I'm surprised that full citizenship for all illegals wasn't thrown in. Every other disgusting boondoggle is included. I'm convinced that the only way these politicians will learn is with full secession from the United States, and it should have happened yesterday.

What a monstrosity that only a Liberal can be proud of: [Hidden Content] I know this article doesn't convey all of the highlights of the spending bill, but includes enough to make every red-blooded American furious with our representatives. Kudos to Rand Paul (along with Jim Jordan and a couple of others) who adamantly oppose this bill and the manner in which is was passed. Since I haven't heard Ted Cruz's stance, Rand Paul has just zoomed to the top of my list of favorite politicians. No person who believes in the American dream should support this. In fact, every American should be livid that so many representatives even consider voting in favor, much less actually doing it. Impeach every single representative that votes in favor, and bring them up on charges of subversion. Secede Now! It can't get any worse! In honor of MIA Big Girl: Thoughts?

You say that as you are counting your extra cash...delivered by that "crazier than cat poop" president, while simultaneously praising the one that had zero problem confiscating your money while calling you weak minded. Yep, this is a crazy world. I wonder when we will run out of safe spaces, Play-doh, and Crayons. Even the puppies are laughing at the snowflakes.

I came very close to starting a topic a few days ago asking what sayings we miss the most on this board since the Liberals have left. For some reason I decided not to...figuring the post might be taken (erroneously) by some as "gloating for running the Liberals off" instead of the lighthearted jest as it was meant. I was predicting Grab'em would be the hands down winner, with the implied (and many times explicit) "y'all are just a bunch of racists" coming in second. It is nice not having to endure being called a racist in practically every Liberal post. The Grab'em comments just made me laugh. I figured the Liberals would jump back on here considering the Liberal news is harping on Trump's sexual indiscretions. I guess even they realize their hypocrisy on that subject is just too embarrassing.

And many still think we do not like Obama because of his skin color.

Proud member.

This is not the same one I remember seeing years ago, but is the same sentiment.

Seems relevant here: [Hidden Content]

I'm outraged about it. So are a lot of other people. And if the President of every citizen of the United States continues on this path, he will probably be beat by a Republican challenger in a primary. If you think there is no outcry then you probably need to expand your news sources and not rely solely on the surfeit of bias Liberal coverage.

What, no BASEketball on this list. LOL. (I can't judge...I've never seen the movie. But from what I've heard, I'm guessing the omission is justifiable.)

Thanks for the post Nash. I've read many articles like this over the past 30 years, but they all seem to get buried in short order...because, like the article stated, it does not fit the "narrative". This one will also never see the light of day in the MSM, and will be buried just like all of the others, and the "leaders" of Liberalism will continue to spout their unproven narrative, simultaneously deriding and ridiculing skeptics (i.e. normal people) as heretics.

The comic relief has returned to the forum...and is still the tired old "everyone on the Right is a racist. No facts, no evidence, just playing the obedient sheeple part of parroting what my Liberal masters tell me to believe." Is it politically correct to laugh at such incoherent, regurgitated non-sense, or should we show empathy with the golden standard "bless his little heart"?

I don't recall anyone on the Right needing safe spaces replete with Play-Doh and puppies. Nor do I recall anyone on the Right needing to gather for a "scream at the sky" cathartic production. There is absolutely no equivalency no matter how loud Rosie O'Donnell and the Left scream it. Even the mere suggestion of a phantom equivalency is just downright laughable. I use this often, but it is especially relevant here. Saying the Right acted how the Left is acting now is like witnessing a ballgame in which the final score was 126-7 and saying "well, both teams scored".

After witnessing the blatant hypocrisy from the Left these past few years, you actually think the Right are the biggest hypocrites? Really? That deserves the obligatory (and capitalized) LOL. Even Rosie O'Donnell has to laugh at that one.

My opinion is that restrictions on gun ownership should equally apply to the right to vote. If you are not qualified to own a gun, you are not qualified to vote. If you are so mentally unstable that the 2nd amendment right of self protection must be stripped from you, then you are too mentally unstable to choose our representatives. If you are deemed not intelligent enough to safely operated a gun, you are not intelligent enough to choose our representatives. If you are deemed too immature to own a firearm until you are 25 years old, you are too immature to choose our representatives until you are 25 years old. If you are required to show an ID to purchase a gun, you should be required to show an ID to vote.

I'm not a gun control advocate, but I would love to get my hands on the list of people that actually purchased one of these shirts. This list is an example of mentally disturbed people not fit to own a firearm...or vote...or even be a part of a civilized society: [Hidden Content] This will take very, very little imagination, but imagine how the media would react if a GOP supporter was propagating things like this about Obama. No wonder the Left has disappeared from this site. How can anyone defend the actions of their fellow cohorts? But somehow, somewhere, many Liberals are still out there in their safe space spouting that Obama was treated badly as president, while simply ignoring the mountains of contradictory evidence piled right in front of their face. Would anyone care to buy one of these?

So are his judges..."obliviously".