Englebert

Even though I'm not a betting man, I would be willing to bet a large sum of money that a Big12 or SEC team will be in the finals. LOL. I wish the CWS would flip the second round losers bracket like the women's do. From what I understand, Texas will play the winner of Arkansas/S. Carolina while Texas Tech will play the winner of Florida/Auburn in the first round.

Wow. Thanks for the entertaining rant. There is so much wrong in your hate-filled diatribe that I don't know where to start. Let's just be content with the notion that "most, if not all, are laughing at you, not with you." If you want to debate any of your asinine contentions, I'm more than ready. But this song and dance has been played out before...with you claiming you ain't got time for that. So I'll just continue laughing but at the same time feel sorry that people like you actually vote for our representatives. I'll continue cashing my bigger paychecks while congratulating my neighbors for cashing theirs, while you stew in the bile and audacity of prosperity.

You know, on second thought, maybe the aliens are much more like us than expected. Maybe they are capable of superior technological advancement, but get derailed and overwhelmed by phony, whiny, dependent, intolerant sycophants (i.e. liberal aliens) who destroy the world through their short-sighted, immoral, and detrimental policies in the worship of political correctness. Hmmm.

I was thinking the same thing. Aliens have/had the knowledge and technology to develop space craft to travel to and populate other worlds...years and years beyond our technology. But somehow, these advanced people cannot foresee something that our challenged "scientists" can somehow observe, measure, and state as gospel. Your statement was clear as a bell, I just felt the need to explain it further to our "Man Made Global Warming Theorists" who deride any challenge to their assumptions.

Here you go REBgp: [Hidden Content] Be warned though, this article is not worth wasting even 2 seconds of your life...other than the minimal entertainment value. The only thing that can be learned from this article is "how can so many nut-cases obtain college professorship jobs?" Do these people become social outcasts by avoiding anyone who will dare ask for validation of their theories?

Will the judges be required to take training classes on inherent "beauty bias"?

I have a feeling California's travel ban will be treated just like they treat immigration law...ignore it. I'm to the point of advocating for the wall to be built along the California border with Arizona and Utah instead of the Mexican border. Can we build both?

It does get boring illustrating examples of Leftist hypocrisy over and over and over and over and over and over... and over and over and over and over....and over again.

Maybe we should all adopt your "blind and run" attitude anytime we see overt examples of racism and/or bigotry. How do you think that strategy would work out for you?

Some organizations separate the purchaser and financial secretary/treasurer permissions. That is, the financial secretary/treasurer has access to the bank statements, receipts, etc. but is not allowed to make purchases. The purchaser can spend the money, but does not have access to the paper trail. This setup allows the purchaser to make purchases without anyone else being present, but also ensures that same person can't hide these purchases. Of course, if the parties are in cahoots, then...

Texas and Texas Tech awarded as host sights. I thought one or the other would receive a bid, but didn't think both would.

The Big12 will get at least 3 teams in, provided Tech doesn't win the tourney. Texas, Texas Tech, and tourney champion (automatic bid) are all guarantees.

For protection against aforementioned problems. Do you really want to inject your wing-nut, glutted diaper, whiny, un-American Liberal policies into this topic?

That's like saying Telly Savalas had a head full of hair. Or like saying Too Tall Jones was a short man. Or Mama Cass was too skinny. Or James Harden has a clean shaven face. Or Hitler was a great man (ooops, Farrakhan actually did say that.)

George Will is in need of a safe space filled with Play-doh and puppies. That's where one goes when placing heavy emphasis on cherry-picked criteria to further a false narrative. The exposure of true colors continues. And no, I'm not yet tired of winning. Keep it up Trump and Pence, and please accelerate the pace of MAGA. The Liberals hate America so much they can't even celebrate when American captors are rescued...all due to the ideology of the rescuers. All they can do is whine and deflect to personal attacks to prevent acknowledgement of accomplishments. I'm sure the Liberals are hurriedly strategizing on how to give Obama credit for Kim Jong-un's release of the American captors, and naturally concoct new personal attacks on any Conservative. You can focus on a sad, bitter little man's hateful rhetoric. Me, I'll celebrate the many accomplishments of the Trump administration. It's been a long time since I've had anything to celebrate in the political theater (sans the last year of course).

Considering the phrase, men are from Mars, women are from Venus, it seems maybe that woman contribute more to "Climate Change" than men: [Hidden Content] Seriously though, according to all reputable sources, the "Climate Change" debate has been over for a long time, even as more and more controvertible evidence emerges. We haven't even scratched the surface yet of understanding Earth's climate, and this is just another example of that fact. The Man-Made Global Warming theorists (science deniers) will undoubtedly shrug this off as fake news...and will continue to heave barbs and name-calling at those of us who find it interesting and baffling as to why such an abundance of theories get little to no attention if Man is not the main culprit. I did find it comical that the last paragraphs had to throw in the very, very unsubstantiated caveat that Man is still the culprit...while providing zero supporting evidence. I guess the author was trying to save his job or stave off death threats.

I'm curious to know if you used this particular type of retort when responding to Obama's many, many, many actions that were evoked when he was in a position of power. The whole idea of a person being a bully versus a person acting in good faith is one hundred percent subjective, even to a child. For you to try the worn out and condescending ploy of the Webster definition puts you squarely in the realm of childishness. But that's to be expected from a narrow-minded bigot incapable of 6th+ grade thought. Dumbing down a conversation is the only way you can participate. Since you consider the 2nd amendment subject to restrictions (gleaned from other posts) for people incapable of exercising that right, shouldn't we be just as or even more cognizant of those incapable of exercising the 1st amendment. Please, please, please give your best answer. I have a Webster's definition waiting for your reply. And I'm shocked that you dare resurrect you pathetic posts after practically all of your previous posts have been proven to be 100% inaccurate. And that percentage is being nice. But please keep posting so we have some entertainment value. Sorry to be so blunt, but your posts scream for professional help.

Do you actually believe that we can't see your avoidance of the question? The childish deflection is just comical. So let's try this again. What controversial views are you alluding to? Are you actually stating that worshipping on Sunday is a controvertible view in America? Please tell me you have something else. And please, please, please tell me you can back up your statements at least on this one. You are o'fer so far. Please get on the scoreboard and give us a cogent defense of your "controversial" statements.

And somehow you equate that to racism. Wow. Double wow. Why won't you admit your problem, and quit trying to cover it up by saying (laughably mind you) that the problem lies with us? You made a race allegation, cannot back it up, then try to deflect by attacking others. Classic Liberalism. Too bad we've caught on to the tactic. Try that first step. It might unleash all the hate you have bottled up inside and free your mind to see reality. There is an old saying that is very relevant here: When you find yourself in a hole, quit digging. Frankly, I don't want you to heed that advice. I want you to keep digging/posting for the off chance someone hasn't realized the extent of your hate, you will leave no doubt. I doubt if there is anyone left, so maybe just for our entertainment value.

Yep, I didn't think you could ascend the intelligence scale. Just admit it, you fanaticize and manufacture racism claims, then get pissed when someone finally calls you on it. Admitting you have a problem is the first step in solving the problem.

Was that directed at me? If so, can you explain what you mean? I have no idea.

You accuse someone of racism, I ask you to provide evidence, you refuse, then deflect to personal attacks on me. I don't mind, and respond in kind, but don't you find it comical that you get so upset for the mere fact that someone dare insult you by asking you to provide evidence of your assertions. You then make statements that you "don't have to prove anything". Sounds like it's time for the old pedophile treatment. You are a pedophile. What age kids do you prefer? What gender do you prefer? How many times can I make baseless allegations before someone starts believing them? And don't you dare have the audacity to ask me for proof. You are a pedophile and that is all there is to it. I don't have to prove anything. How does that treatment feel?

I'm with stevenash, what are the controversial views you allude to?

And Nancy Pelosi said that Trump fired Mueller. Must be from the same source.

But somehow you made it through reading a whole bunch of non-sense of the Christians sinking the Titanic. You must have been sneezing and wheezing a whole lot during that hell you put yourself through. Please tell me you can do a lot better than this childish jab. If you are going to keep responding, I'm hoping I can expect more of an ascension on the intelligence scale, but I'm not very confident.