OlDawg

Entrance requirements were too high. 🤓

One of the best movies of all time! Positive waves Moriarity…positive waves. Oh man, I only drive it. I don’t know what makes it work… Definitely an antisocial type. Bring me my uniform!!! Makes it feel like home don’t it. It kinda does… And who can forget the classic Kilroy. Ha! Own 2 copies of that movie. Watch it regularly when I want to chuckle.

Good work DCTF!

So did everyone else. 😁

Yes x 1000

True dat. (Music in background) Clowns to the Left, Jokers to the Right, here I am...stuck in the middle...

Problem is, if you're an independent in Texas, you don't really have a say in the primaries. If you pick Demorat or Repugnican, you're stuck with the choice for 2 years. I've voted for Perot, Paul, and even Johnson. Ron Paul was the best of the three IMHO. Media portrayed him as 'batty.' Far from it. Used to talk with him all flight long from Cleveland back to Houston. I was leading a project for Lubrizol in Wycliffe, OH and he practiced what he preached and always took the cheapest flights--which happened to be the red eye from DC to Cleveland, then to Houston. We got to the point we sat by each other for the discussion. One of the smartest--most genuine--men I've ever met. We didn't agree on everything. No one ever does. But, he stood by his convictions. His son is somewhat similar.

A little surprised by Kagan, Jackson & Sotamayor. Interesting that Kagan wrote the opinion. Goes against the typical liberal mantra of ‘it’s the gun.’ Agree the characterization of AR-15 style rifles as ‘common’ will have future impacts when gun control issues try to portray them as military weapons only.

A regular Dionne Warwick are we? 😉

I think—for a man supposedly as smart as Musk—he let himself be played. Like the wife who wants a divorce a year after marriage because he didn’t change like she thought she could make him. If he was naive enough to think he could make a real difference, he’s not as smart as portrayed.

‘My Dad could beat up your Dad..nu uh…uh huh…nu uh…uh huh—to infinity…nu uh…I dare ya…’

Tariffs cut deficit by $2.7 Trillion over 10 years with a modest one time increase in inflation per CBO. Of course, this assumes tariffs stay at 10% with 60% on China. It also assumes SCOTUS rules them legal which is highly debatable from a separation of powers standpoint. [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content]

2 out of the last 3 elections, Democratic primary voters have voted for someone else to run for POTUS, and the Democratic Party elites have said “screw the voters.” No incumbents next election. Maybe people will realize what a sham it all is and look for something different. I wonder how many people even realize neither the Democratic nor Republican Party mention personal liberty as a priority any more. The entire reason for founding this country, and neither ‘major party’ emphasizes it any more. Talk about having the public brainwashed…

Yes

One thing about it, if you vote for a Democrat and they don’t like who you picked, they’ll always pick another one for you. 😂😁

No issue with the question. It’s a valid one. I basically already answered it in my response to SmashMouth earlier. It doesn’t fit a pure Libertarian Party mantra. Just like the Libertarian Party supports open borders. However, there are as many different types of libertarians (little L) as there are liberals & conservatives. I am a limited government/states rights fiscally conservative libertarian. Again, little L. I recognize the need for government involvement in certain areas, and I don’t believe in open borders until we fix the welfare state. In those instances where government wants to be involved, It should go to the voters for approval. This is an instance that’s been shown to be very successful for cancer research using the Texas model, and the private sector is not ALWAYS the be-all-end-all. The private sector runs on profits as we all know. This effort—which will go before the voters as a possible Constitutional Amendment—would be using taxpayer money (with their permission) for a common cause that is projected to save money on State funded medical costs in the future, and generate tax revenue for Texas in the mean time. That’s what the Texas Cancer Research Institute does now, and has done since 2007. I don’t think it would be proposed if it didn’t have some monetary benefit for the State even if it is compassionate. And yes, being at the State level (closer to the people) makes a difference to me. Plus, it wouldn’t be a ‘government agency’ in that sense. It would be funded with taxpayer money, but run like a private entity with all grants peer reviewed and approved by ‘expert’ peers—not politicians—before authorization. It also would be audited like a business. I’m okay with it since it would be approved by the taxpayers paying for it for—hopefully—their benefit if needed. Texas has also shown to be good stewards for the Cancer Institute. It’s also a hybrid model of government/private sector. No real difference between it and funding University research—except overhead is capped at a much lower level, and the efforts would have to relocate to Texas. If it wasn’t being proposed to the voters, I’d have more questions. You should read the links I’ve posted. They’ll give you more info, and probably explain to you more why I’m okay with it. Chances are, it won’t help my wife. We’re on borrowed time already as she was diagnosed in 2018 & life expectancy is 6-8 years for most with her condition. But, hopefully it can help others. Basically, it’s a proven, good use of public funds in my estimation that would have public approval and more local control. Libertarian philosophy doesn’t mean no government. It means a limited, approved, justified government that doesn’t infringe on personal liberty. More people are libertarian than what they realize.

Understand. Like I said before, I’m really hoping AI can help. Our Neurologist says it’s helping medical researchers make super progress. Issue is still the regulatory approval process. Takes years… As strange as it sounds, when my wife was diagnosed & we got multiple opinions from experts a few years back, we were hoping each time it would just be “simply” typical Parkinson’s.

There is a new blood test for tau protein levels that’s very accurate for the diagnosis & stages of Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s & Corticobasal Degeneration. These diseases all have tau buildup in the brain that is believed to cause the issues. [Hidden Content]

Pretty impressive!

Our condolences go out to all who have lost a loved one to these cruel diseases. We’re hopeful AI can help play a big role in helping to find cures faster.

Amen

For those curious what corticobasal degeneration is, the below link is fairly easy to read. It affects around 2,000-3,000 people per year in the U.S., so it’s one of the rare ‘Parkinsonism’ diseases. It’s typically called a Parkinson’s Plus disease. Not much is known about it at this time, and research has been very limited. We’ve been told by the Head of the Neurological Dept. at Houston Methodist (who provided our 2nd opinion after a barrage of all kinds of tests), that Big Pharma hasn’t concentrated any effort on it because there’s not enough of a potential revenue base. But, since it has some similarities to Alzheimer’s, dementia, & Parkinson’s, a new offshoot treatment—if discovered—for one of those conditions might help. [Hidden Content]

Thanks for your kind thoughts! We are one of the most positive, laughing couples you’ll find. We make it a point to have a big hearty laugh at least 17 times a day. Why that number? No idea. I think I read it keeps you healthier somewhere at some time. She rarely gets frustrated. Usually, it’s when I can’t understand what she’s trying to tell me. She cries a little then, but I tell her it’s not her. It’s my bad ears, and we laugh about it. As far as the Research Center, I found some info on the Cancer Center this will be modeled after. I’m a limited government guy also. At the least, a more local control government person. This appears to be more of an ‘investment in the future’ type of hybrid initiative set up as a pseudo government sanctioned entity. I would describe as similar to the PUC I guess. Somewhat independent. But, Board members appointed by the Governor. Every grant has to be peer approved by medical experts. Attached is the latest report in PowerPoint easy to read slide form. Surprised I didn’t remember anything about it. If the Neurological effort is passed & set up similar, hopefully it can be just as successful. According to this report, it actually generates over $2 Billion/yr. in tax revenue for Texas, and still is able to be the 2nd largest grant funded initiative in the world. Pretty impressive for Texas. [Hidden Content]

I wasn’t aware of this. But, the research center idea came from Texas creating a similar center for research into cancer. Interesting read of the back story. [Hidden Content]