SmashMouth

[quote name="Knoddy1" post="1074139" timestamp="1317839727"] I think I remember reading that the exact punishment for the two Ned boys would be re-evaluated after additional information was gathered, and this was before the Vidor game. obviously with their reinstatement that was done, I do not know or have knowledge of that information, and some of the Judges on this thread don't either.  Just a little info for 58shu if  the guys reinstatement was because of our opponent, then it would have happened last week before we played PN G...that was a bigger game for the dogs than this week [size=18pt][u][b]and if you don't know that then you are truly clueless[/b][/u][/size]. [/quote] 58SHU is TRULY clueless!

[quote name="DawgsOfGold" post="1074114" timestamp="1317837992"] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89311.msg1073940#msg1073940 date=1317825807] [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89311.msg1073931#msg1073931 date=1317825143] Potential 1st Rnd Matchups: GAME 1: #1BMT G vs #4 Bmt B Game 2. #2 Lum W vs #3 Lum R Game 3. #1 Png G vs #4 Png W Game 4. #2 Wos vs #3 Ned B [/quote] Good work, now keep going. Bmt G beats Bmt G Lum W vs Lum R (give me your pick) Png G beats Png W WOS vs Ned B (give me your pick) [/quote]I'll take Lum R because u said they hit harder. [/quote] LOL...good one.  What about WOS vs Ned B

[quote name="dogfather" post="1074119" timestamp="1317838251"] [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89140.msg1074100#msg1074100 date=1317836492] [quote author=demons95 link=topic=89140.msg1074084#msg1074084 date=1317835506] I just got finished printing the Super Bowl trophies.  I already put BMT-G's name on it.  Ya'll are a good team but take the props people give you and keep handling business.  That rotator cuff has to be sore as many times as ya'll pat yourselves on the back.  I saw that game with Lum-R and #3 went up the gut untouched 2 or 3 times for touchdowns.  I assure you that won't happen with Lumberton White. Better have your 7 yr old big boy panties on.  It's gonna be a long day. [/quote]#3 up the middle will be the least of your problems ;D Your right, its gonna be a long day for others as well [/quote]The DOGFATHER will be there ( to bad all this message board DONT fire the Kids up )             [color=red][u][b]We are reeeTards[/b][/u][/color][/quote] You said it dogfather!  Man this is fun.  Demons95...you have no idea... Bmt G ain't the watered down teams y'all been playing.

[quote name="58SHW" post="1074150" timestamp="1317840824"] [quote author=dawg-lover link=topic=88772.msg1074148#msg1074148 date=1317840464] You believe the media? I have never heard of a punishment where they have a list of things to do in order to be reinstated. Normally you are given the punishment, you serve your time and then you are reinstated. I just find it to be a huge coincidence that only the 2 football players have been released early and the 3 others are still finishing out their punishment. What is that teaching the kids? [/quote] That "athletic kids will be athletic kids"...all others fall under "kids will be kids" and that it's ok....because everyone else is doing it, HS, NCAA (DI, DII, DIII, JuCo) NFL, MLB, NBA, badmitten, etc [/quote] Look folks, another comment that makes no sense!

[quote name="58SHW" post="1074018" timestamp="1317830642"] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=88772.msg1074016#msg1074016 date=1317830342] [quote author=58SHW link=topic=88772.msg1074012#msg1074012 date=1317830174] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=88772.msg1074008#msg1074008 date=1317829877] [quote author=58SHW link=topic=88772.msg1073997#msg1073997 date=1317829450] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=88772.msg1073974#msg1073974 date=1317828048] [quote author=58SHW link=topic=88772.msg1073966#msg1073966 date=1317827382] Yes, Ned kids who were drinking or had been and got caught (even if was due to further stupidity of posting it) and the extention of those action as to how others attending the same party (and others) were NOT so lucky. Several has stated that had the OF kids been there kids...then heads would roll....etc etc etc. So..had the Ned kids fallen, and been killed would that change the blame from kids being kids to HANG the home owner. The point is everyone wants to take one road if it seems "innocent enough" no one got hurt, its kids being kids......but had those kids died or killed someone else....then crucify someone else because its their fault. As stated, as young as 14 you can be accountable as an adult. Just answer this question (this is to anyone, and everyone) if these were your kids....would you treat the situation differently as it happened than you would had they been killed, or killed someone else, maybe even killed your kid while driving on their way to the school. Why and/or why not? [/quote] What doe "Why and/or why not?" mean.  Also, please explain the question more clearly.  It is hard to understand.  If I understand it right, then it is an insanely stupid question.  Please clarify. [/quote] Ok, let me type this a whole lot slower. If  one  of  the Ned  kids  had  fallen  and  died,  would  you  have  felt  any  different  about  this  situation? Why  would  you  have  felt  the  same,  or  why  would  you  have  felt  differently? it is all opinions here, and obviously some of yours vary from mine. But if a person purposly pulls a gun and starts shooting, you could be charged with attempted murder. Therefore IMO (regardless of yours) If a person purposely gets drunk, purposely gets behinds a wheel and purposely drives (and potentialy puts my family's life at risk) it should be attempted murder or manslaughter. It is an intentional act that puts other (innocent) peoples lives in danger, and if its considered a dead horse so be it.....alot better than a dead people. [/quote] Thanks for clarifying your question.  Now I can tell that it truly was a stupid question and not just very poorly written.  Let me ask you this.  Do you agree that speeding on the freeway is dangerous...even deadly?  Have you ever gone over the speed limit?  If you were pulled over for speeding, should you be arrested for attempted murder or manslaughter?  How do you like your steak cooked?  What are you wearing right now.  Will these stupid questions or analogies ever stop?  ...Get my point? [/quote] In fact I do! Anytihng can be justified! ;) [/quote] That is ridiculous... [/quote] Why? because my opinion varies from yours? Must be a democrat (open or closet) when someone's opinion varies from yours....just start calling them names. ::) [/quote] Believe me, I am FAR from being a Democrat.  I have never called you a name (though some may have come to mind).  I did say that some of your statements were ridiculous or stupid, because they are. Stating that someone pulled over simply for speeding should be tried as a murderer is unintelligent.  It's not the fact that we disagree, it's the appearance that you are possibly out of touch with reality that prods me to make the statements I have made. ...and from the responses you have been getting to your goofy unintelligible posts, I would say I am not alone in my assessment.

[quote name="pngfan97" post="1074017" timestamp="1317830527"] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89140.msg1073880#msg1073880 date=1317821676] [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89140.msg1073862#msg1073862 date=1317820376] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89140.msg1073781#msg1073781 date=1317782909] [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89140.msg1073558#msg1073558 date=1317764725] Not only do they have speed, those guys are physical and dont mind laying the wood. I know there's a rumor that they can't hit, and they don't like to get hit. I think they've proven some folks wrong over the past few weeks!! [/quote] With all due respect Dawgsof gold, both of the Lumberton teams out hit the BMT G team (not by much) in my opinion; however, you guys have a very well coached greasy lightning fast team with some hosses on it.  Lum W can hit, but they can't hit what they can't catch.  Good luck to you and your athletes. [/quote]Both Lumberton teams out hit Bmt G is too funny. I think Lum R coaches and players will say otherwise. [/quote] Bmt G hits real good and they are fast, but they do not out hit Lum R or Lum W.  I am not saying it is a landslide, but I have seen all 3 play in several games and I would have to rank 1. Lum R 2. Lum W 3. Bmt G in that 3 way match up.  No disrespect intended, believe me.  You guys will beat Lum W...I am sure of it.  You've got some decent hitters and crazy speed.  I like watching your boys play. [/quote] Last time I checked, out hitting a team doesn't mean anything if it doesn't put points on the scoreboard.  And I'm sorry, but I saw some of the bmt g/lum r game and that was about as lopsided a contest between two good teams I've ever seen.  Bmt G dominated that game from start to finish and put plenty of hard hits on Lum r's workhorse.  Bmt g is a scary team. [/quote] I have stated on numerous occasions that Bmt G is a better team than anyone in their division and have a chance of winning it all.  We were simply having a discussion about who hits harder.  Bmt G definitely dominated the Lum R...that was never the question.  They did lay down some hard hits too.  Nobody questions that either.  I simply stated (and I have watched many of all 3 teams' games) that Lum R hits harder...doesn't mean they are going to win another game or that Bmt G can't hit.  Hope that clears it up...

[quote name="58SHW" post="1074012" timestamp="1317830174"] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=88772.msg1074008#msg1074008 date=1317829877] [quote author=58SHW link=topic=88772.msg1073997#msg1073997 date=1317829450] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=88772.msg1073974#msg1073974 date=1317828048] [quote author=58SHW link=topic=88772.msg1073966#msg1073966 date=1317827382] Yes, Ned kids who were drinking or had been and got caught (even if was due to further stupidity of posting it) and the extention of those action as to how others attending the same party (and others) were NOT so lucky. Several has stated that had the OF kids been there kids...then heads would roll....etc etc etc. So..had the Ned kids fallen, and been killed would that change the blame from kids being kids to HANG the home owner. The point is everyone wants to take one road if it seems "innocent enough" no one got hurt, its kids being kids......but had those kids died or killed someone else....then crucify someone else because its their fault. As stated, as young as 14 you can be accountable as an adult. Just answer this question (this is to anyone, and everyone) if these were your kids....would you treat the situation differently as it happened than you would had they been killed, or killed someone else, maybe even killed your kid while driving on their way to the school. Why and/or why not? [/quote] What doe "Why and/or why not?" mean.  Also, please explain the question more clearly.  It is hard to understand.  If I understand it right, then it is an insanely stupid question.  Please clarify. [/quote] Ok, let me type this a whole lot slower. If  one  of  the Ned  kids  had  fallen  and  died,  would  you  have  felt  any  different  about  this  situation? Why  would  you  have  felt  the  same,  or  why  would  you  have  felt  differently? it is all opinions here, and obviously some of yours vary from mine. But if a person purposly pulls a gun and starts shooting, you could be charged with attempted murder. Therefore IMO (regardless of yours) If a person purposely gets drunk, purposely gets behinds a wheel and purposely drives (and potentialy puts my family's life at risk) it should be attempted murder or manslaughter. It is an intentional act that puts other (innocent) peoples lives in danger, and if its considered a dead horse so be it.....alot better than a dead people. [/quote] Thanks for clarifying your question.  Now I can tell that it truly was a stupid question and not just very poorly written.  Let me ask you this.  Do you agree that speeding on the freeway is dangerous...even deadly?  Have you ever gone over the speed limit?  If you were pulled over for speeding, should you be arrested for attempted murder or manslaughter?  How do you like your steak cooked?  What are you wearing right now.  Will these stupid questions or analogies ever stop?  ...Get my point? [/quote] In fact I do! Anytihng can be justified! ;) [/quote] That is ridiculous...

[quote name="58SHW" post="1073997" timestamp="1317829450"] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=88772.msg1073974#msg1073974 date=1317828048] [quote author=58SHW link=topic=88772.msg1073966#msg1073966 date=1317827382] Yes, Ned kids who were drinking or had been and got caught (even if was due to further stupidity of posting it) and the extention of those action as to how others attending the same party (and others) were NOT so lucky. Several has stated that had the OF kids been there kids...then heads would roll....etc etc etc. So..had the Ned kids fallen, and been killed would that change the blame from kids being kids to HANG the home owner. The point is everyone wants to take one road if it seems "innocent enough" no one got hurt, its kids being kids......but had those kids died or killed someone else....then crucify someone else because its their fault. As stated, as young as 14 you can be accountable as an adult. Just answer this question (this is to anyone, and everyone) if these were your kids....would you treat the situation differently as it happened than you would had they been killed, or killed someone else, maybe even killed your kid while driving on their way to the school. Why and/or why not? [/quote] What doe "Why and/or why not?" mean.  Also, please explain the question more clearly.  It is hard to understand.  If I understand it right, then it is an insanely stupid question.  Please clarify. [/quote] Ok, let me type this a whole lot slower. If  one  of  the Ned  kids  had  fallen  and  died,  would  you  have  felt  any  different  about  this  situation? Why  would  you  have  felt  the  same,  or  why  would  you  have  felt  differently? it is all opinions here, and obviously some of yours vary from mine. But if a person purposly pulls a gun and starts shooting, you could be charged with attempted murder. Therefore IMO (regardless of yours) If a person purposely gets drunk, purposely gets behinds a wheel and purposely drives (and potentialy puts my family's life at risk) it should be attempted murder or manslaughter. It is an intentional act that puts other (innocent) peoples lives in danger, and if its considered a dead horse so be it.....alot better than a dead people. [/quote] Thanks for clarifying your question.  Now I can tell that it truly was a stupid question and not just very poorly written.  Let me ask you this.  Do you agree that speeding on the freeway is dangerous...even deadly?  Have you ever gone over the speed limit?  If you were pulled over for speeding, should you be arrested for attempted murder or manslaughter?  How do you like your steak cooked?  What are you wearing right now.  Will these stupid questions or analogies ever stop?  ...Get my point?

[quote name="PN-G bamakid" post="1073988" timestamp="1317829032"] I just want to clarify something real quick. Per a very reliable source, the OF kids that died in that tragedy were not coming home from a party in Port Neches, or anywhere else in Mid-County. If they were ever at the party in question (which I doubt providing my information is correct, and I find it hard to believe otherwise), they had left long before the car accident. In any case, I think it's time for this conversation to end. I agree that kids need to be taught about consequences and that examples like these should be used to convince them to think twice, but an argument on an internet message board does nothing to that end and many of the persons in question are minors. [/quote] You are correct.  Time to let it end.

[quote name="Ochocinco" post="1073734" timestamp="1317779409"] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89213.msg1073521#msg1073521 date=1317761490] [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89213.msg1073443#msg1073443 dayote=1317758378] [quote author=CF22 link=topic=89213.msg1072970#msg1072970 date=1317688228] There all good but I still have PNG-G at the top. I cant wait to see it all shake out in the playoffs...If you want to be technical why dont you power rank the teams like baseball. PNG-G and Ned B have had the easiest schedules out of all these teams. Its hard to judge until they play one another. [/quote] Png-g is the only team that has had an easy road. They have only played PA and you seen the score 15-12. So im not so sure about them being at the top. [/quote] You guys are the ones at the top...Png-G is good though.  Don't underestimate. [/quote]So are Lum R, Lum W, Ned B, & Wos. Im predicting that Png G will lose to Wos or Lum R. Those are tough back 2 back games... [/quote] Those are pretty strong claims...Png G might have something to say about that.  I honestly hope nobody goes undefeated, but I really think Bmt G and Png G will win out in the regular season.  We'll see...

[quote name="58SHW" post="1073966" timestamp="1317827382"] Yes, Ned kids who were drinking or had been and got caught (even if was due to further stupidity of posting it) and the extention of those action as to how others attending the same party (and others) were NOT so lucky. Several has stated that had the OF kids been there kids...then heads would roll....etc etc etc. So..had the Ned kids fallen, and been killed would that change the blame from kids being kids to HANG the home owner. The point is everyone wants to take one road if it seems "innocent enough" no one got hurt, its kids being kids......but had those kids died or killed someone else....then crucify someone else because its their fault. As stated, as young as 14 you can be accountable as an adult. Just answer this question (this is to anyone, and everyone) if these were your kids....would you treat the situation differently as it happened than you would had they been killed, or killed someone else, maybe even killed your kid while driving on their way to the school. Why and/or why not? [/quote] What doe "Why and/or why not?" mean.  Also, please explain the question more clearly.  It is hard to understand.  If I understand it right, then it is an insanely stupid question.  Please clarify.

[quote name="DawgsOfGold" post="1073920" timestamp="1317824303"] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89140.msg1073880#msg1073880 date=1317821676] [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89140.msg1073862#msg1073862 date=1317820376] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89140.msg1073781#msg1073781 date=1317782909] [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89140.msg1073558#msg1073558 date=1317764725] Not only do they have speed, those guys are physical and dont mind laying the wood. I know there's a rumor that they can't hit, and they don't like to get hit. I think they've proven some folks wrong over the past few weeks!! [/quote] With all due respect Dawgsof gold, both of the Lumberton teams out hit the BMT G team (not by much) in my opinion; however, you guys have a very well coached greasy lightning fast team with some hosses on it.  Lum W can hit, but they can't hit what they can't catch.  Good luck to you and your athletes. [/quote]Both Lumberton teams out hit Bmt G is too funny. I think Lum R coaches and players will say otherwise. [/quote] Bmt G hits real good and they are fast, but they do not out hit Lum R or Lum W.  I am not saying it is a landslide, but I have seen all 3 play in several games and I would have to rank 1. Lum R 2. Lum W 3. Bmt G in that 3 way match up.  No disrespect intended, believe me.  You guys will beat Lum W...I am sure of it.  You've got some decent hitters and crazy speed.  I like watching your boys play. [/quote]Lum R #1. Obviously you didn't watch the game between the 2. Bmt G punished their backs. Oh, and they tackled our backs 1 time. The other 6 plays went for 60yd+ touchdowns. We only ran 7 total plays. Don't get that confused with 7 possessions. They did however tackle us on a few 2pt conversions and kickoffs. The score was actually 47-19. 41-13 after 3. 47-13 early in the 4th. Bmt had to put some offensive players on D just so players could get their plays. [/quote] Yes, I watched the game.  I did not say your boys couln't tackle.  I said Lum R hits harder.  Their QB / LB had the hardest hit of the game.  I don't think punished is the right word.  You tackled their backs more times than they tackled your backs...which reverts back to what I said.  You can't tackle what you can't catch.  Your two best hitters are not slouches, but from the times I've seen all 3 play, I stand by my claims.

[quote name="58SHW" post="1073926" timestamp="1317824770"] [quote author=Cheermom4 link=topic=88772.msg1073385#msg1073385 date=1317753053] [quote author=58SHW link=topic=88772.msg1073382#msg1073382 date=1317752399] [quote author=Cheermom4 link=topic=88772.msg1073377#msg1073377 date=1317751396] I was not referring to the OF kids being killed.  [b]There is no comparing the kids doing whatever on top of the doggie dome to the OF kids being killed at 3AM in a car crash.[/b]I know as a parent I have never and will never supply alcohol to minors.  There are too many things that could happen and I do not want their blood on my hands.  I also know that if someone supplied alcohol to my child and something happened I would do everything in my power to have them prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. [/quote] Maybe not a comparison, but there is apparently a connection. Per at least one poster, they attended the same party. Ned kids were obviosly luckier than the OF kids....seems they did drive from PN to Ned to pull their silly kid stunt. Besides I didnt say you did "compare" them. I was just stating perhaps WHY some are still talking about it. All I did was mention those who "paid" their debt, for their mistakes, being with their life or missing activities. BUT, there is no mention to the consequences of the adult AND that following not one but two DUI arrest, LU brings them to our home area (not to mention the boastful article by the BE, as giving second chances)..just saying, Id bet a whole lot that the parents of the OF kids WISH they had a second chance. [/quote] Totally understand but from what I have heard the kids from OF went to a couple of different parties after they left he one in PN (again not taking up for the parents where this party took place).  If I remember correctly they were at one that was in Mauricville.  Not that it matter because because no amount of second guessing will bring those boys back.  I am also positive there are parties going on in every community in America every Friday and Saturday night where alcohol is served to minors.  I don't agree with and [b]all I can do is teach my kids right from wrong[/b] and hopefully it sinks in and they remember. I haven't read the BE paper in years so I can't comment on an article that I haven't read.  But in no way shape or form should drinking/ drinking and driving be glammerized. [/quote] That is definately a great start, but there is always more. Whereas on the extreme measure, people who are charged with felony crimes will pay their debt to society, however, they lose certain privleges in addition to that...voting, gun ownership...etc and some argue those are rights under the constitution. But when you cross certain lines, you lose those rights. If not only parents teaching kids, but law enforcement, coaches, and school admin would simply state, if you are involved in certain levels of crimes (or mischief as some call it) that even "potentialy" hurt another person, then your extraciricular priveleges are revoked. (selling of drugs, DUI, DWI, assault etc) Problem, as on the LU thread, [b]it is more important to WIN at all cost and continue to allow some to break laws and endanger others [/b] than to make this highly contrivercial stand. [/quote] When you have paid your debt to society, then (generally speaking) your privileges are reinstated.  If these young athletes did the wrong thing and got themselves in trouble, then they should be punished.  BUT...when the punishment has been fulfilled, they should be able to return to normal activities (including College football).  Get off of your high horse and quit making idiotic comments that have not been thought out just because you have a "beef" with what many, many, many colleges do regarding "second chance" players.  The Lamar staff never said it is more important to WIN at ALL COST, nor have they portrayed that stance with their actions.  You are exaggerating to make a point.  If you don't like the choices they have made, simply state that.  Otherwise, don't crucify someone for the rest of their life when their debt has been paid.  Let us all thank God that he forgives those of us that ask for it, and that we are not condemned forever (except maybe in your mind) to damnation for our indiscretions and wrongdoings.  Wasn't this thread about Nederland kids, anyway?

[quote name="DawgsOfGold" post="1073931" timestamp="1317825143"] Potential 1st Rnd Matchups: GAME 1: #1BMT G vs #4 Bmt B Game 2. #2 Lum W vs #3 Lum R Game 3. #1 Png G vs #4 Png W Game 4. #2 Wos vs #3 Ned B [/quote] Good work, now keep going. Bmt G beats Bmt B Lum W vs Lum R (give me your pick) Png G beats Png W WOS vs Ned B (give me your pick)

[quote name="Cheermom4" post="1073911" timestamp="1317823270"] [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=88772.msg1073787#msg1073787 date=1317783901] [quote author=Cheermom4 link=topic=88772.msg1073181#msg1073181 date=1317738121] [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=88772.msg1073108#msg1073108 date=1317728786] [quote author=Ned11str8 link=topic=88772.msg1066434#msg1066434 date=1317031562] [quote author=td link=topic=88772.msg1066432#msg1066432 date=1317030915] This sounds like kids just being kids. I'm not sure why some people are making a big deal out of it. I for one am glad I didn't get caught doing all of the stupid things I did as a teen. Let them take their punishment and move on. [/quote] Amen td ! Amen  . They're children [/quote] And at 18 they are adults - stop hiding behind they are children, does something really dumb they will be tried as adults. [/quote] Sorry but all of my children turned/will turn 18 at he beginning of their Senior year.  Legally they are an adult but mentally they are still a teenager who still has lots to learn. I still can't believe we are still talking about this after all this time.  The kids made a mistake and were punished for it, let it be. [/quote] This is something we need to talk about every day maam. Sorry my kids are not 18 till the start of their senior year??? What does that have to do with anything?? Mine were 17 when they graduated, but they were taught that they have to be ready to accept the consequences for their mistakes and at some point that would be as adults. We did not and will never hide behind this banal kids making mistakes. Geezus criminy - are we seeing why we have a problem? This is not a nederland, PNG or Friendswood issue - this is a big time society issue and for some one to get tired of talking about it tells me alot. [/quote] Where in my posts did I say that they should take responsibility for what they did?  I do and have taught my children even my youngest one who is in elementary school that there are consequences to your actions.  Apparently those kids who got caught accepted their consequences.  What I have a problem with is everyone is still talking about it and beating a dead horse so to speak. [/quote] AAAAAAAmen!

[quote name="dexdangerous" post="1073885" timestamp="1317821814"] There is no lose. Only win and quit. [/quote] Man, that was deep... I don't know if I will ever look at competition the same again.

Anything can happem.  L-town is due for a win, but that doesn't make it automatic.  The fact that PN-G is really P.O.'d is touching, but that doesn't make a win either. Lumberton wins this one at home in a close game.  Good luck to both teams.

[quote name="BADSANTA" post="1073878" timestamp="1317821641"] Anything can happen but I don't see Orangefield beating the Tigers. The Bobcats have a good team and I  think that they could be a playoff team if they can beat Bridge City. Silsbee will be well prepared coming off a bye week. Silsbee is suspect early in games on their run defense. That will be one area that the Bobcats can attack early but Silsbee will make adjustments. [/quote] Very good synopsis. I can't see Silsbee giving this one up.

[quote name="DawgsOfGold" post="1073862" timestamp="1317820376"] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89140.msg1073781#msg1073781 date=1317782909] [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89140.msg1073558#msg1073558 date=1317764725] Not only do they have speed, those guys are physical and dont mind laying the wood. I know there's a rumor that they can't hit, and they don't like to get hit. I think they've proven some folks wrong over the past few weeks!! [/quote] With all due respect Dawgsof gold, both of the Lumberton teams out hit the BMT G team (not by much) in my opinion; however, you guys have a very well coached greasy lightning fast team with some hosses on it.  Lum W can hit, but they can't hit what they can't catch.  Good luck to you and your athletes. [/quote]Both Lumberton teams out hit Bmt G is too funny. I think Lum R coaches and players will say otherwise. [/quote] Bmt G hits real good and they are fast, but they do not out hit Lum R or Lum W.  I am not saying it is a landslide, but I have seen all 3 play in several games and I would have to rank 1. Lum R 2. Lum W 3. Bmt G in that 3 way match up.  No disrespect intended, believe me.  You guys will beat Lum W...I am sure of it.  You've got some decent hitters and crazy speed.  I like watching your boys play.

[quote name="DawgsOfGold" post="1073868" timestamp="1317821094"] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89311.msg1073860#msg1073860 date=1317819939] Two undefeated teams in Conference 1: Bmt G Lum W One undefeated team in Conference 2 Png G Bmt G & Lum W still have to play each other (last game of season) with no real tests for either of them until then Png G still has to play a 4-2 Lum R team who has losses to WOS (6 to 0) and Bmt G (47 to 19) I think Bmt G wins out and Png G wins out... What are your thoughts, guys? [/quote]Conference 1 1. Bmt G 2. Lum W 3. Ned B 4. Png W Conference 2 1. Png 2. Wos 3. Lum R 4. Bmt B [/quote] I guess I see it the same way.  By your rankings, I assume you mean that Bmt G defeats Lum W and Bmt G goes undefeated; Are you saying that Png G goes undefeated too?

Two undefeated teams in Conference 1: Bmt G Lum W One undefeated team in Conference 2 Png G Bmt G & Lum W still have to play each other (last game of season) with no real tests for either of them until then Png G still has to play a 4-2 Lum R team who has losses to WOS (6 to 0) and Bmt G (47 to 19) I think Bmt G wins out and Png G wins out... What are your thoughts, guys?

[quote name="Riding Solo" post="1073609" timestamp="1317767463"] [quote author=thefourthcarminebrother link=topic=89139.msg1073454#msg1073454 date=1317758674] interesting bus ride home ;) [/quote] Just like it will be for Silbee after the first or second round of the playoff's. I can hear it now, atleast we make it. That is true but the tigers have talent year in and year out but yet they fizzle in the palyoffs every year. [/quote] That's what a lot of teams who are sitting on the front porch licking their wounds during the post season say... Easy to criticize, but hard to beat.

[quote name="DawgsOfGold" post="1073558" timestamp="1317764725"] Not only do they have speed, those guys are physical and dont mind laying the wood. I know there's a rumor that they can't hit, and they don't like to get hit. I think they've proven some folks wrong over the past few weeks!! [/quote] With all due respect Dawgsof gold, both of the Lumberton teams out hit the BMT G team (not by much) in my opinion; however, you guys have a very well coached greasy lightning fast team with some hosses on it.  Lum W can hit, but they can't hit what they can't catch.  Good luck to you and your athletes.

Heartfelt prayers to all involved.

[quote name="Ochocinco" post="1072903" timestamp="1317682183"] [quote author=teamraider link=topic=89140.msg1072848#msg1072848 date=1317677831] [quote author=Ochocinco link=topic=89140.msg1072821#msg1072821 date=1317675563] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89140.msg1072584#msg1072584 date=1317655269] [quote author=Ochocinco link=topic=89140.msg1072129#msg1072129 date=1317589401] [quote author=LHSALLZONE link=topic=89140.msg1071913#msg1071913 date=1317579959] ocho, what happend , we got beat by a better team  lol [/quote]Don't anoint Bmt G just yet. They still have to play Olexa's team, Lumberton White. I don't think his team is as good as Lumberton Red's, but by far the coaching is. [/quote] Tell you what, I'll take odds on BMT-G over Lum-W any day of the week.  Got to see them play already and it ain't nice...  Lum W (a very good team) does not have the tools to handle this 1st class team.  Oh, and they are coached pretty well too [/quote]Do you care to elaborate on the "It ain't nice," & "Don't have the tools" comments? [/quote] What part don't you understand? I think as misguided as it might be the point was clear. Guess we'll see in a couple of weeks. [/quote]I don't understand the "Don't have the tools" comment. What "Tools" that Lum-W don't have to handle Bmt-G? [/quote] To quote our friend from Nederland, "Speed kills"...that's the tools I am speaking of (3, 9, 11 & one more...couldn't see his number cuz he was running too fast!).  Also, looking at stats, you guys played a very good, but not 1st seed quality Ned B team.  Both you guys had key injuries according to these boards, yet you beat them by only 1 point.  Ask Ned B what they think your chances are against BMT G.  Lum W is a 1st class team, there is no doubt.  But I would be willing to wager on BMT G over Lum W any day of the week.  Does that make it more clear?