-
Posts
88,577 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
633
Everything posted by AggiesAreWe
-
Post scores for these games here Non-District [b]Goose Creek Memorial 57, Clear Creek 44[/b] [b]Lufkin Pineywoods Academy 16, Tarkington 101[/b] [b]Martinsville 39, Broaddus 52[/b] [b]Brookeland defeated Starks, LA[/b] [b]San Augustine 78, Colmesneil 34[/b] [b]Big Sandy 50, Zavalla 44[/b] [b]Evadale 64, Orange Community Christian 52[/b] [b]Beaumont Legacy 60, Sabine Pass 45[/b] [b]West Hardin 61, Goodrich 44[/b]
-
Score by quarters 1 2 3 4 tot Legacy 16 14 19 26 75 Hull-Daisetta 9 9 15 24 57 Team stats FT % Legacy 9/17 53% HD 7/17 41% 3 point % Legacy 4/12 33% HD 6/17 35% Rebounds Legacy 42 HD 36 Turnovers Legacy 19 HD 19 Individual scoring Legacy Coutee 19 Carr 18 (12 rebounds, 6 block shots) Durgin 13 (15 rebounds) Brisco 11 (3/5 three pointers) Carter 6 Kemp 3 Schults 2 Monger 2 J. Dargin 1 Hull-Daisetta Welch 23 (21 in 2nd half, 3/6 three pointers) Mosely 21 (2/7 three pointers, 1/8 FT) Cassidy 5 Hopkins 4 Redmond 2 McClusky 2
-
MONDAY DEC. 17th BASKETBALL SCORE UPDATES/Post'em
AggiesAreWe replied to AggiesAreWe's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
Final New Caney 49 Kingwood Park 56 Summer Creek 56 Humble 61 Dayton 40 Porter 47 -
MONDAY DEC. 17th BASKETBALL SCORE UPDATES/Post'em
AggiesAreWe replied to AggiesAreWe's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
Final Beaumont Legacy 75 Hull-Daisetta 57 -
Ozen vs. Central predictions 12/18/12
AggiesAreWe replied to BMTSoulja1's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
[quote name="BLUEDOVE3" post="1356158" timestamp="1355778333"] [quote author=BEARCAT link=topic=107508.msg1356121#msg1356121 date=1355771544] I can tell you in two words: "actual momentum" ;D [/quote] Everybody got jokes now.... [/quote] It's all "for fun". ;) -
[quote name="eagleswoodville#1" post="1356114" timestamp="1355769152"] Woodville has beaten Sabine Pass, Kirbyville, and Leggett. Seems a little off to me that they haven't even gotten a vote up to this point. Oh well. [b]They play Colmesneil on Thursday in their tourney.[/b] Guess we will have to beat them too. The same Colmesneil team that lost to GSF? Come on now. [/quote] Woodville does not play Colmesneil this Thursday in the Colmesneil tourney. The Colmesneil tourney was two weeks ago. Woodville's schedule this week is Tuesday at Kountze, Friday home against Newton.
-
[Hidden Content]
-
[Hidden Content]
-
[quote name="BLUEDOVE3" post="1356092" timestamp="1355765535"] [quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=107525.msg1356086#msg1356086 date=1355765292] [quote author=BLUEDOVE3 link=topic=107525.msg1356022#msg1356022 date=1355756938] [quote author=BMTSoulja1 link=topic=107525.msg1356012#msg1356012 date=1355755819] [quote author=freeze 1914 link=topic=107525.msg1355991#msg1355991 date=1355753291] [quote author=BMTSoulja1 link=topic=107525.msg1355916#msg1355916 date=1355710314] Yes, this could be interesting. I'll threw the stars of the teams I've seen thus far... In no particular order... 1. Chatman - Memorial 2. Lott - " " 3. Pearson - Central 4. Wileridge - " " 5. Wiesbrod - Nederland 6. Johnson - H-J 7. Holmes - Silsbee 8. Zeno - West Brook 9. Green - " " 10. Hunter - Ozen [/quote] good list [/quote] That's just some names I've thrown out there. My partner in crime, AAW, have seen more of these kids play, so I'm really interested and liking forward to that list. [/quote]AAW? Thank God this is just a [b]"for fun" list.[/b] [/quote] What other reason would there be a list on here? None of it really matters in the grand scheme of things. Our rankings (team or player) does not produce results on the court or has any bearing on future results of players and teams. But according to Dove, maybe we are just wasting our time with all this. ::) [/quote] I said it was for fun and NOT wasting time :P I didn't want you to list your family members and waste our time ;) [/quote] But stating that it was "for fun" wasn't necessary. We all know that to be the case with that type info posted on this site, including your posts. A ranking of players or teams that we put together here is to draw interest and conversation. Do not see the reason why you need to put a disclaimer on it or try to discredit. FYI, I have no family playing basketball or any other sports. My oldest son is in college and my youngest is a senior in high school but does not play high school sports because of him being autistic. He does participate in Special Olympics and has won at the state level in swimming.
-
[quote name="BLUEDOVE3" post="1356022" timestamp="1355756938"] [quote author=BMTSoulja1 link=topic=107525.msg1356012#msg1356012 date=1355755819] [quote author=freeze 1914 link=topic=107525.msg1355991#msg1355991 date=1355753291] [quote author=BMTSoulja1 link=topic=107525.msg1355916#msg1355916 date=1355710314] Yes, this could be interesting. I'll threw the stars of the teams I've seen thus far... In no particular order... 1. Chatman - Memorial 2. Lott - " " 3. Pearson - Central 4. Wileridge - " " 5. Wiesbrod - Nederland 6. Johnson - H-J 7. Holmes - Silsbee 8. Zeno - West Brook 9. Green - " " 10. Hunter - Ozen [/quote] good list [/quote] That's just some names I've thrown out there. My partner in crime, AAW, have seen more of these kids play, so I'm really interested and liking forward to that list. [/quote]AAW? Thank God this is just a [b]"for fun" list.[/b] [/quote] What other reason would there be a list on here? None of it really matters in the grand scheme of things. Our rankings (team or player) does not produce results on the court or has any bearing on future results of players and teams. But according to Dove, maybe we are just wasting our time with all this. ::)