Sign in to follow this  
Big girl

Trump impeached

Recommended Posts

1
1 hour ago, UT alum said:

I do believe snagging is against the law. If you couldn’t catch fish that way, it wouldn’t be illegal.

Have you ever been fishing??? Doesn’t matter .....common sense would help you recognize the analogy.  
then again your smart enough to see it but ....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, 5GallonBucket said:

Have you ever been fishing??? Doesn’t matter .....common sense would help you recognize the analogy.  
then again your smart enough to see it but ....

Yes, I fish. I’m familiar with TPWD regs, and your analogy was flawed in my estimation. Bare hooks do catch fish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Yes, I fish. I’m familiar with TPWD regs, and your analogy was flawed in my estimation. Bare hooks do catch fish.

Not with the same success that baited ones do, c'mon man. The time you spent reading into that was far too long and now I revoke your devils advocate position, I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, OverTheBack said:

Not with the same success that baited ones do, c'mon man. The time you spent reading into that was far too long and now I revoke your devils advocate position, I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

He will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, OverTheBack said:

Just a quote from a movie, don't take it personally and stop reading so much. Rest your brain/eyes lol

Didn’t see that one, I guess. The way the Repusslicans dissect every jot and tittle that comes from a Democrat’s mouth, I take each word at its value.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Yes, I fish. I’m familiar with TPWD regs, and your analogy was flawed in my estimation. Bare hooks do catch fish.

My oh my!

go back and read what I said and what I didn’t say. In bold

and no it wasn’t flawed.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Didn’t see that one, I guess. The way the Repusslicans dissect every jot and tittle that comes from a Democrat’s mouth, I take each word at its value.

I take jot and tittles very seriously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, UT alum said:

I believe if he’s convicted in the Senate he will be immediately removed from office and barred from serving in any federal office in the future.

I think they have to "formally vote" on it after conviction. But yes, that is what will happen if he is convicted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, UT alum said:

I believe if he’s convicted in the Senate he will be immediately removed from office and barred from serving in any federal office in the future.

I think he could still hold office, just not anything big. Not sure on that though...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, UT alum said:

Oh, yeah, like that plunge in 2007? Which party had the White House? My accounts were halved, came back under President Obama, and have gained under “little hands” as the economy President Obama saved continued its expansion.

Lmfao!! Giving credit to Mr. Shovel Ready jobs.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said:

Lmfao!! Giving credit to Mr. Shovel Ready jobs.  

Yes, the weakest post recession recovery in 50 years.  The only President to NEVER have a single year out of 8 that provided a 2% GDP.  So Obama "saved" the economy?.  Go ahead and name the recessions ( regardless of political party) from which we did not recover.  We were going to recover regardless of who was in office because this is a resilient country/economy.  The bounce back from 2008 could have/should have been much more robust but the party that had the White House implemented policies and attitudes that prevented same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You know, these dims crap all over OUR constitution on a regular basis, especially during this impeachment process, but when it seems to serve them, they reach in their hip pocket and try to quote it, or at least recognize it. It also bothers me when they talk about our founding fathers, as if they would make even a pimple on any of their rear ends. Those visionaries were pure geniuses. I wonder if any of our congressmen today are aware of this.....

The founding fathers only paid senators and congressmen a “per diem” amount while in session. They knew that if congress was paid a salary that they could always vote to increase, then they would no longer be “Of the people” but “Above the people”. They wanted those in Congress to be subject to the same economic and financial conditions as the rest of the nation based upon the laws they passed.......genius

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Member Statistics

    41,478
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Sonja69
    Newest Member
    Sonja69
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...