All Activity

This question may have already been asked. Really don’t want to back through 9 pages to find out. Why are democrats against using a photo ID to vote? I know why, just want to see if any liberal here wants to tell the truth about why. Probably not!

Read my Bible. Pretty good one coming from a left wing democrat whose party has no problem killing babies or pandering to the homosexuals. Maybe you should do the same, you think!

Trump effect……he can make people contradict themselves. Lmao

God used Judas to betray Jesus right into the will of God so no worries here. 😎

I think it’s the pinnacle of hubris to think that God would pick a political side.

[Hidden Content]

You remind me of that individual that always says I am not going to church because there’re too many hypocrites. And I say come on in there’s always room for one more. Point being we are ALL FLAWED INDIVIDUALS.

Just keeping this up close to the top because oral arguments are this Wednesday. Thought we could continue using this thread. I still think this is going to be one of the most fascinating oral arguments in a long time, and it will have possibly the greatest impact on America as any case in the last 100 years or more. It will be interesting to see how things fall out in questioning. I see the 3 liberal Justices just going with the status quo. I see 4 Justices going more with the originalism/textualism viewpoint. I see 2 Justices being open to the original intent of the 14th, but wanting to make sure their ruling only applies going forward, and how best to address it if they rule for original intent. The arguments for original intent are stronger than many think. Getting over the hurdle of history is still a tall task. But, this SCOTUS has shown a willingness to break with bad precedents in previous rulings. So, we'll see.

[Hidden Content]

The part in bold is just another sign of you being CB.. Only he would make that comment. BTW, LumRaiderFan is not banned. I guess he decided not to come back from his week of vacation.

God is about to use Donkeys to rebuke Trump and MAGA come November. Amen.

He just said the same thing that I’ve been saying all along. You have the presumption of innocence, but you can never be proven innocent. If we already know that you can’t be proven innocent, why would there need to be a policy in the FBI code that states what everybody knows. I guess the better question is why did they decide to include the language about the investigation “not exonerating” Trump? It seems superfluous to me… because I understand basic principles. Most people have cloudy views. A popular leader is investigated over alleged criminal wrongdoings, and the final reporting says “we found evidence that indicates criminal acts occurred, but we do not believe that a conviction can be won… we are closing our investigation, but this is not an exoneration of politician T.” The crowd goes wild and says “see? T didn’t don anything wrong! Fire the guy who looked into it! We’ll all celebrate when he dies!” Kinda like when the DOJ decided to end their investigations into Trump when he retook office in 2024 because they didn’t want to indict a sitting president. The Trumpers took that as “proof” that the investigations had “proven Trump innocent” when in fact they were closed despite the fact that there was a LOT of evidence of criminal wrongdoings.

Let’s not forget this is Robert Mueller.

Hasn’t been addressed since about 1980, the when the deficit began to take off hence the Uniparty.

I don’t get it… both parties are refusing to even address our spending. That used to be the job of the republicans.

There are Democrats and Democrat Lite. In other words the The Uniparty. We have a corrupt unserious government.

And you aren’t bothered by it. Here’s the thing, and I hope I’m not stepping on any toes. One of the posters here lost his wife last week. Person after person has offered their condolences. People from both sides of the arguments. People with whom this poster has had differences of opinion, tossed insults, etc… but everyone that has spoken kindly regarding his loss. What would your feeling have been if someone here had posted “good. He deserves to suffer?” My guess… no, it’s a fact that the person that stated such an atrocious thing would be uniformly blasted and rightfully banned instantly because of that person’s hateful speech. You would be aghast. I’m sure that you’re a decent person. What is it about Trump that makes those other decent men abandon their principles and decency? You’ve come here laugh about how Trump is celebrating the loss of an American who served faithfully in war, directly under four different presidents from both parties, and who led the FBI. Your profile pic shows the thin blue line… you support law enforcement, but here you are giving your approval for Trump celebrating the death of one of your brothers in blue. It makes no sense to me.

Thank you for the response. I’ve always been conservative… the Republican party has just moved away from me. It’s not about fiscal conservatism anymore… it’s just tax breaks with uncontrolled spending. They no longer espouse any fiscal restraint or thoughtful reflection whatsoever. The party that jumped all over Bill Clinton for his *gasp* immorality now worships a guy who makes Clinton seem saintly. Unfortunately, the left is no better. They continue to pick the most extreme among them to hold office, and they’re completely out of touch with reality. It’s why the new reoublican cry is to end open primaries in Texas. They want to make sure that independents and moderates aren’t allowed any say in which candidates are selected to run in the general election. They only want zealots. But you’re right about Fetteman… what the Rs offer today isn’t palatable to the general pop… it’s just not as offensive as what the Dems keep offering. it’s not a coincidence that Trump best Kamala and Hillary, but couldn’t beat Biden. Biden was electable, the other two weren’t.

Reliable source for what? That Saudi Arabia built this pipeline?

Late reading this, but I’m sorry to hear about your loss. I can’t even imagine.

Trump said something stupid and crude. I’m shocked!!

I don’t know what that line is for me. I don’t really support him, per sé. I didn’t like him before, I absolutely can’t stand him now, and he’s doing a really good job of setting the Dems up for retaking power, which is terrifying. That said, the far left (which is somehow just becoming “the left” and driving party policy) is so indefensibly insane that I’d still take Trump over the alternative. I was fairly liberal in my early 20s. By the time I hit 30 I was what I considered a “radical moderate”, meaning I had strong beliefs that aligned with both sides. For the past decade I’ve considered myself a libertarian, but with no realistic traction in that party I vote right. The ONLY shot the right has of keeping control after the outrage Trump has continually sparked is the fact that the left has become absolutely goofy, meaning moderates and swing voters can’t just write off the right because of Trump’s behavior (and if we’re honest, shaky second term). If the Dems would get rid of all the kooks and took a hard look at Fetterman and modeled themselves after him they’d win EVERY branch in a landslide and might stay in power for the next 50 years.