All Activity

And then we have the North Shore Atascocita Summer Creek CE King district which is the exception rather than the rule

Well, I'll argue this until UIL gets rid of 4 teams advancing out of 4 and 5 team districts. I don't consider my thoughts as an overreaction. I think it's pretty logical. Overall numbers prove it. I have made this point many years. I think there are too many teams in the playoffs. My two cents.

Go Stangs!

In Tapps, they generally take 50% of the teams and round up for odd team district. So, 3 playoff teams for a 6 team district. Much smaller scale of course than UIL. You also don’t know exactly what the bracket is going to look like until they release it every year.

The Lutnick Epstein connection was mind blowing. Out right lied to congress about their relationship with Epstein. Which brings about why Trump would keep someone so slimy close to him.

West Fork can not stay within 14. Not unless they have improved drastically.

Back to the topic at hand, I think this is a better team than we might expect. I don't see it being a game like we've seen in the last few weeks. I expect to win but I'm going with about a 14 point victory.

no one in SETX should ever be in Reg 2…

1.) Atascocita 2.) Summer Creek 3.) United 4.) Montgomery 5.) Nederland 6.) PNG 7.) Lake Creek 8.) Stafford 9.) Huffman 10.) Vidor 11.) HF 12.) Canton 13.) Silsbee 14.) WOS 15.) Doboll 16.) Fairfield 17.) OF 18.) Hardin 19.) New Waverly 20.) Mildred 21.) Garrison 22.) Joaquin 23.) Shelbyville 24.) Colmesneil 25.) West Sabine

I don't understand how I could pull up several broadcast last night on You tube, but your saying PNG can't broadcast the game on You tube. Were the broadcasts last night renegades or something that figured out a way around 'rules' ?

There are some rumblings and it all don't surround winning........

I know the UIL tries to avoid 4 and 5 team districts when possible but in some areas its just hard to avoid

They are played on Thursday for a reason…

Four teams in a 5 and 6 member district is too much. IMO should only be two teams. Also, some teams are having to travel way too far when a 1 seed gets a home game and the 4 seed has to travel to their stadium. It's not cheap for teams to travel with band, drill team, etc.

Teague will have a difficult time stopping Hardin. However, if Teague can throw the ball, they will have a shot.

Great way to describe Stafford to me is inconsistent… Some games they seem to put it together and are solid… others they stumble… but regardless they have size and speed.

I'm looking forward to next year when the 4 seed team gets to travel to the 1 seed's home field!

So wasn’t the All World QB for Westwood out injured? If so, I was wondering about that Westwood offense.

There was one 4 seed upset last night as Ozona beat a regional favorite in Post.

I like having four. Yes, it’s watered down. But we sometimes also get really good games, and chances for teams that would otherwise NEVER make the playoffs to get to be part of it. Also, having four teams doesn’t in any way diminish the best high school playoff in the world. It’s just one more week of football, and there are always upsets.

If there are any teams we may face in the playoffs for the second time this season (i.e., FB Crawford or Brenham), I like our chances. It's difficult to beat Coach Joseph twice in one year.

I was gonna say 4 touchdowns. BC isn't very good, and while stafford isn't polished, they have size and speed all over the field.

Different person, but Lutnick should have been gone long ago when the Epstein connection was uncovered. He's also the brains behind some of the private company buy-ins by the government. Apparently, Bessent tried to tell Trump. He didn't listen. Now, we may have national security issues because of Nvidia & Lutnick. smh

why did the oldest Bryant get ejected after that scuffle on the sideline early in the 1st half ? I would not have known who it was, but he had on his letterman and exchanged words with the white hat

The part that I like most about the 4-team system is it gives hope to a team that has a sub-par year, but is awarded a chance to play in the post-season. They get a taste of what its like and for some communities, it's the best thing that's ever happened to them and gives them a hunger for more. Yes, it does kind of fall in line with the everyone gets a trophy mindset, but in some of these cases, we've seen some programs make a huge turn-around recently. But, as the poster mentioned, it seems like the vast majority of the first round games are completely one-sided so I get the argument for sure.