All Activity

I would much prefer this over Vance/Rubio. Paul would provide some good balance to reign in government overreach.

We are borrowing money to fight other countries wars. We are about to hit 40 trillion in debt. That to me is more a National Security risk. Just wondering what happened to America First. There better be solid intel that we don’t know about.

Agree 100%. Sometimes we think we have the knowledge to make a call on how a situation should be handled, which is naive. And this applies to much more than just Iran. It comes down to hoping the folks in power are making the right calls. Thank God Harris and Waltz aren’t making the call.

That is not at all the same thing. You seem to know all about how the FBI works and what goes into tapping phone lines? Please explain why they are innocent and did not break policy......I even gave you some help of how it all works in my last post....explain away

I wouldn’t have any major issues with a Rubio/Paul ticket. Sort of a complementary ticket of strength & global experience along with restraint of government & civil liberties. If they’d work together well, it could be a very good pairing for the country.

I'm not happy with Trump's approach to Iran or any other conflict he may be medaling in. However, I realize there may be much more intel of happenings going on the world that we know nothing about. I just hope he knows what he's doing because it can be a powder keg.

and you do? The FBI recording of a conversation between Susie Wiles and her attorney when her attorney was aware. In the FBI files there will be multiple forms of documentation about this. This is called "consensual monitoring" -- where one party to the conversation is aware the FBI is listening and recording but the other does not, and the party that is aware agrees to that. The FBI cannot do this on its own. It must seek and obtain approval from a DOJ prosecutor to do so. Some states have laws against one-party consent -- called "Two Party" states -- and require both parties to be aware and agree that the call is going to be monitored and recorded. Others are what is called "One-Party" states. Florida is a Two-Party state -- meaning the call as described was a violation of state law. The FBI is allowed to violate state law while conducting an investigation -- same principle as undercover work. But the attorney involved, if also in Florida and a member of the Florida State Bar, likely is not protected in all respects. The FBI could authorize him to violate Florida law -- but there will be another FBI document showing that as well. That document does not protect him for violations of his ethical obligations that apply to his license. And lets not forget that the FBI only investigates crimes. To get to the point of having a recorded call between a "subject" and that persons attorney, whatever this investigation was has proceeded well down the tracks. Finally, there are a host of DOJ Regulations about the manner in which attorneys can be investigated with regard to allegations of criminal conduct against their clients or others. Finally, you don't just hook up an attorney in a consensually monitored call without having a detailed history recorded in the case file about how you got to that point. It is highly likely this call was going to happen according to a "script" -- the FBI/DOJ had specific issues they wanted the attorney to discuss or ask about. _ShipwreckedCrew Lets see what happens.......

Amen!

Silsbee vs. Houston ISD teams over the last 13 seasons (2013-present) Overall record 26-8 Playoff record 19-6 Since the 2016 season, Silsbee is 15-3 vs. Houston ISD in the playoffs. The three losses were to Yates in 2019 regional final, Washington in 2023 regional final, Wheatley in 2025 2nd round. Wheatley ended up in state championship game. One could say that Silsbee has owned Houston ISD over the last dozen years. I see the overall going to 26-9, playoff record to 19-7.

Does anyone have the link to purchase tickets for the game tomorrow

You have to admit that it’s a little bit comical that you guys are on one thread crying that Boykin wasn’t investigated “because he’s part of the good ol’ boys club,” while starting a different thread that talks about how FBI agents should lose their jobs for daring to investigate someone who is a member of the good ol’ boys club.

You don’t need to be a fan to grasp the policy. I have noted what he mentioned in one of my earlier post. The inmate in the orange jumpsuit set off alarm bells. You would have to understand how SHU works and the policy officers must follow when they are working in the capacity of SHU 1, SHU 2, SHU 3, and the Rec. Officer. The story given about the recording device after a incident does not add up either.

You guys don’t understand how the legal system is supposed to work. When someone claims that an illegal act has occurred, it’s the job of law enforcement to investigate that accusation. I don’t remember anybody going on trial for their dealing with Russia… as in, the investigation yielded no conclusive evidence. The system worked. The argument now is that investigating the claim is a fireable offense. A LEO should not examine the evidence or look into the clues. He/she should instead look into the political background of the accused and use their political leanings to determine guilt or innocence. Attorney General gets accused of impropriety? Even allowing the investigation to move forward is the act of a traitor, in Texas anyways. Not every allegation is true, but neither is every allegation false. They should be looked into, and prosecuted when the evidence warrants a prosecution. Should we imprison police officers for investigating a crime because the trial didn’t result in a conviction? Or just fire them? What if the investigation didn’t lead to a single arrest? The cops should be disciplined? That what the right believes.

I was hoping you would find a way to put Boykin in this post.....a little disappointed.

Did they even open the binders?

Russia Hoax was a perfect example of a crooked DOJ and no one has been arrested for it even with proof. We can’t run a country with a sitting President (Obama) spying on an incoming president and manufacturing nonsense against the incoming administration in order to destroy them. That’s just one example of many.

If you were to put a ticket together who would be at the top and who would be the running mate? Just curious. Same question to all!

I don't know, they could shoot it and offensively they could control tempo with good sets in the half court.

Almost a year late but I’ll take it. 👏👏👏 I have said many times I don’t think Trump and his Administration has fired enough people especially in the DOJ.

Exhibit A ^^^^^^ If it was a dem being spied on, we’d have Watergate.

It’s a sad day for America when doing your job gets you fired once a new leader takes office. Their job is to investigate crimes… they shouldn’t be punished for doing so. Maybe that’s y’all’s opinion. Trump should fire everyone who investigated reports of wrongdoing, even though refusing to investigate would have lead their firing. This is another reason why partisan hacks shouldn’t be in the ranks, much less leading, these types of organizations. Instead we reward partisan hacks with leadership positions in these very organizations. I guess we shouldn’t be surprised when the next admin fires everybody who looked into Biden and hires Antifa/blm members as FBI special agents. Instead of having young men/women who typically served in the military, then developed skills that lead to a success career as an experienced agent, we can just fire everybody and hire a bunch of new zealots every 4 years. That’s dumber than DEI.

solid point guard play, Which reminds me of Braelon Bush. The most electric point guard that I have seen play in the 4A ranks.

[Hidden Content]

[Hidden Content]

It doesn’t matter… if he’d been born a Trump instead of a Boykin, everybody would be busy blaming the victims, like they always do. My suspicion is that this young man has good counsel, and the first thing that they do is stall. It’s going to be interesting to see if a jury will eventually do anything or if he takes a plea deal. My understanding is that the DA and Judge that handles criminal cases in Hardin County are both set to retire at the end of ‘28… if that’s true, I doubt that there will be a big rush from the state or the bench to push this one to trial on their way out. edit… I just checked the inmate roster in Jeffco and he’s no longer a guest in their jail-I thought he was being held without bond down there, but I guess not.