All Activity

So I take it that you’re opposed to the death penalty here in Texas and the slaughter of citizens in Gaza and Iran? Didn’t think so. Don’t feel bad…Flexible morals and selective outrage are the hallmark of most people today.

1. Chester 2-0 2. Brookeland 3-1 3. Apple Springs 2-1 4. Zavalla 0-2 5. Burkeville 0-3

Again, judge on, brother. I don’t have a bitter bone in my body. I’m rolling around in a patch of bitter weed every time I come to this site. It’s hard enough to figure things out for myself. Why would I try to figure them out for everyone else? Oh, and just because God can use anything he pleased to accomplish his work doesn’t mean he does.

🤣... hook line sinker

Trump fired Flynn for lying.

Is this the one you are talking about? Looks like cheating may have taken place!

Amen!

We ALL know that YoBama did it. The question is -- WHY?!

You weren’t paying attention. If you show up on Election Day with an ID they’ll tell you try again next year…. You won’t be allowed to vote. People will need to re-register using your birth certificate or passport, plus additional documentation of your name on your birth certificate doesn’t match your ID.

Vidor/WOS is not a big game,likely both games will be run rule.

Team LCM 7-0 Bridge City 6-1 Silsbee 5-2 Vidor 4-4 Lumberton 3-5 WOS 1-7 Jasper 0-8 Games this week 3/30-4/2 Jasper v Silsbee Silsbee v Bridge City LCM v Vidor LCM v Lumberton Lumberton v Bridge City Jasper open

This sounds like something straight out of a Democrat’s mouth. Don’t fall for that way thinking. You basically have to have a photo ID for just about everything. I don’t see the big deal in being required to show one to vote. I told the election officials when I voted a month ago that I would be glad to show them my ID when they asked for it. I said it loud enough so that any Democrat there could have heard it. After what I heard about Schumer and his wife’s business, if true, I understand even more why they are against it. As far as what I made bold print, that is total bs, IMO.

What is one of the Ten Commandments? Thou shall not commit murder. Very self-explanatory. I guess to some, just not Democrats.

No doubt and that’s @UT alum party of choice.

Not judging, you’ve totally looked over the fact that god can use anyone anytime. And as for not knowing you just going by the fruits of your post you’ve been a a bitter individual for a long time. Sounds like you’ve got everything figured out for everyone. No need to be bitter at me.

I’ll take a split most anytime. Abreu is such a great pitcher, but when he gets 2 outs and 2 strikes, he has trouble with that last killer strike. Toughest pitch in baseball.

And what did Jesus have to say about abortion or homosexuality?

Donkeys are innocent and dumb. Not following the primary tenets of God’s new covenant is not a speck. It’s a freaking railroad tie. As to pronouncing whether or not there’s a plank in my eye, you can speculate all you want, but you don’t know me. I try and clear my eyes daily. Judge on, brother, judge on.

Thank you, Bullets. It’s a hard road, but I have some good friends and a couple of boys who will help me get on.

They’re fleeing Protestant churches faster.

The Supreme Court has never ruled on birthright citizenship for people illegally in the country. People who support birthright citizenship almost always point to Wong Kim Ark as the defining case demanding it. After reading Ark (a long time ago), that doesn’t seem to be the conclusion that the Supreme Court decided. In Elk v. Wilkins 14 years after the Fourteenth Amendment the Supreme Court ruled that a Native American born on US soil in what is now called the lower 48 contiguous states, was not an American at birth. Why? Because he owed allegiance to a sovereign Indian nation, the Winnebago. In owing allegiance to a foreign nation, in this case on US soil, did but fit the meaning in the Fourteenth Amendment of being subject to the jurisdiction thereof. Was Elk subject to US laws? Absolutely. If new committed theft, murder, not paying taxes, etc., he was subject to American laws. The Supreme Court decided that didn’t fit the meaning of being subject to the jurisdiction of the US. Along came Wong Kim Ark not long afterwards. Ark was born in the US to parents were subject to the Emperor of China. Like Elk, Ark owed allegiance to a foreign nation. So what was different? Wong Kim Ark’s parents were here legally and had submitted to US jurisdiction by being granted permanent residency and by running a business with the consent of this nation and the state. Again, Wong Kim Ark’s parents were given lawful permanent residence in this country before he was born. That was sufficient for being subject to the jurisdiction of the US. But let’s not take my word for it. Let’s see what the Supreme Court said in their concluding statement in the case making Wong Kim Ark a citizen, …….who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicil and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China, becomes at the time of his birth a citizen of the United States. For the reasons above stated, this court is of opinion that the question must be answered in the affirmative. Order affirmed Note that the Supreme Court makes notice that the family are subjects to a foreign jurisdiction, the Emperor of China… BUT have a permanent domicil and residence in the United States, again, their quote. is that the same as illegal entry into this country, as many people claim? If the Supreme Court intended for every person born on US soil to be citizens, why wasn’t that their decision? Why did the Supreme Court bring up the family being subject to the Emperor of China but it changed because they were given a permanent residence in the US? Hmmmm…. Because they thought it mattered perhaps? This was a precedent setting case and the Supreme Court was well aware of it. TheIr final statement could have simply been, “any person born on US soil is a citizen”. Nope, the Supreme Court worded the decision how it was asked. Was Wong Kim Ark a citizen? Yes as his family was given permanent residency under US law. In my opinion the Supreme Court has not ruled on people in this country unlawfully. In fact in the case of Elk, he was in this country lawfully and was still denied citizenship at birth. What in Wong Kim Ark overturned that? In my opinion, nothing. So we will finally have a ruling on birthright citizenship. Like I have already said in this forum, I feel like the Supreme Court will say that birthright citizenship is constitutional and that will put that issue away. Looking at Supreme Court precedent, it doesn’t appear to be so definitive as some people claim.

Not really worried. Even if it happens, it’s no surprise. All the dems will do is make government stagnant. That’s leadership? That’s what they were voted to do? Really? That’s it? Again, no policy for Americans. More fraud and thievery. Good call.

It doesn’t matter, we’re not voting our way out of this mess. This country is ran by lobbyists and special interest. Each politician goes to the highest bidder to stay in office that goes for Republican and Democrat. It will eventually implode at this pace from spending.

Oh no. The dreaded impeachment.