All Activity

Everything that I’m seeing indicates that the second pilot is still missing. But they’re also reporting that the Iranians also shot down a Warthog yesterday, too, but that pilot ejected over the gulf and was recovered almost immediately. Supposedly two of our rescue choppers took heavy, damaging fire during the attempted rescue of the f15e but made it back to base with injured crewmen.

I’ve said from the get go that Trump has not fired enough people quick enough.

No other news is reporting. May not be accurate.

Can’t post it as I don’t use X. But, saw a funny post from Jon Lovett. In a surprise twist, the Epstein files released the attorney general. lol

I was there. Hillin wasn’t “escorted off the field.” Was there a Buna ISD officer there, yes, but just to make sure he left the field after the ejection. It’s normal procedure when things like that happen. Hillin left immediately after he was ejected without issue.

Watching the Astros vs the A’s and can’t understand why they kept Javier. He is not any good and the bullpen may possibly be the worst in the major league. I will say Diaz mistake cost them 6 runs

Schedules usually don't get updated until August.

I thought both sides argued their cases pretty well. I didn’t agree with some of Wong’s assertions about ‘no foreign national’s children ever being citizens’ because she totally disregarded legal domicile, and WKA relied on domicile. But, domicile seemed to be a question among some of the Justices also. I wonder if SCOTUS tries to find a way to rule that an EO can’t address this question of citizenship without directly addressing constitutionality. Basically, they rule the EO unconstitutional, but don’t really totally close the quandary of the meaning of the 14th. They kind of punt, and hope it goes away for a while. I could see there being multiple decisions using different rationale on this one instead of just a majority and dissenting using similar stances.

Used to be Splendora, Battle of the Bell. I know we had a recent rivalry with Hardin but that looks to be over now.

Lamar has struggled the past 3 games. Way too many errors, haven’t scored a run vs OS, and pitching staff is struggling, especially bullpen. They may be leading the nation in giving up walks

Throw Buna in that mix too.

Mostly through the mid-late 90s up until '01 I believe.

Yes... I was at the game posting updates on here and to me for all of the games of the series especially at least the ones I've seen this was the very best game bar none.

One thing I always wanted to know: Who is Tarkington's true rival? (I don't think that Cleveland has ever considered them as rivals.)

Was just about to say the same thing. Didn’t Coldspring win the match up in 24-25?

Same could have been said when the shoe was on the other foot when we were doing all the winning in the series.

This source says 2nd pilot still missing. Hoping mine is false. [Hidden Content]

TDS will never allow them to be satisfied!

No sir, not from the haters. Trump could say the war will be over @ 12:00 noon tomorrow. If it ended @ 12:01, you’d have the haters complaining that he said 12:00. No doubt in my mind.

6 month bids are at $72. Not the lows. But, certainly not the highs. With current efficiencies, $70's are a good medium between costs for the consumer and margins available for maintenance by the refiners. People forget they have to have room for maintenance. Most of our refineries have been running 110% for a long time with only 'band-aid' fixes. It's akin to running your car at max RPM's for 2-3 years, and never changing the oil. You know it's going down, and when it does, it will be for an extended time because the damage will be magnified. It used to be break even was in the $80's. But, our efficiencies have drastically dropped the number. *The 6 month bid number is global. The other numbers and comments are for the U.S.

Hopefully, he's correct. He is retired. So, not sure how he's getting his info.

You under estimate the power of an election.

What I thought was interesting were the basic arguments. Both advocates were arguing for original intent. They just disagreed on said intent. The real change was the implication. I found the typical sides somewhat reversed. The ACLU typically argues form a 'living Constitution' framework. They believe the interpretation should change with the times. Except, not in this case. In this case, Wong specifically stated that even if Congress voted 435-0 to modify citizenship, they shouldn't be allowed to because of her interpretation of the 14th. This is typically an originalist/textualist argument. The Solicitor General was arguing that times had changed, and the original intent was misinterpreted in earlier cases. So, he was basically arguing that the current times and events showed that the Framers of the 14th wouldn't have meant how it was being applied in the current interpretation. He was using current events to justify meaning, along with historical text and rulings. I just thought it struck me as almost a reversal of argument roles. I'm also surprised Sauer didn't hammer home the point that 'allegiance' also requires agreement from the people of the U.S. more than he did. It's not just a one-way street where the immigrant says they want to be here. The people of the U.S.--via immigration laws--have to say they're willing to accept their allegiance. Until immigration law changes by the People's will through their Representatives, illegal immigrants are just that--illegal, and not supposed to be here. Thus, their children shouldn't be here. If they want to come to the U.S. through legal channels, the People typically welcome with open arms.

My response: No, not all. But it's not hard to figure when they are!