All Activity
- Past hour
-
ScoreboardBot reacted to a post in a topic: Orangefield (41) @ St. Louis Catholic (19) Q4
-
Orangefield (41) @ St. Louis Catholic (19) Q4
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
!!:41/19/4 -
BOBKAT'88 reacted to a post in a topic: When is snap shot day ?
-
ScoreboardBot reacted to a post in a topic: New Waverly JV (26) @ West Hardin (40) Q4
-
New Waverly JV (26) @ West Hardin (40) Q4
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
!!:26/40/4 -
ScoreboardBot reacted to a post in a topic: Tarkington (12) @ Hardin (51) Q4
-
!!:12/51/4
-
ScoreboardBot reacted to a post in a topic: New Waverly JV (26) @ West Hardin (40) Q4
-
New Waverly JV (26) @ West Hardin (40) Q4
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
!!:20/40/4 -
Stangfan#1 reacted to a post in a topic: Orangefield @ St. Louis Catholic Live Audio Broadcast - Thursday, September 18 at 7:15 PM
-
Grand Saline (19) @ Joaquin (0) Halftime
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
!!:26/0/3 9:07 -
ScoreboardBot reacted to a post in a topic: Orangefield (41) @ St. Louis Catholic (19) Q4
-
Orangefield (41) @ St. Louis Catholic (19) Q4
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
!!:34/19/4 -
ScoreboardBot reacted to a post in a topic: Tarkington (12) @ Hardin (51) Q4
-
!!: 12/45/3/5:25
-
-
ScoreboardBot reacted to a post in a topic: Orangefield (41) @ St. Louis Catholic (19) Q4
-
Orangefield (41) @ St. Louis Catholic (19) Q4
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
!!:27/12/3 2:38 -
My understanding is that he hasn’t been technically ‘fired.’ They may still be paying him as an employee, and just stopped producing & broadcasting the show. Not quite clear on that part yet. Haven’t paid attention to any of the late night shows since Leno left, and haven’t watched SNL in decades. None of them were funny any more.
-
ScoreboardBot reacted to a post in a topic: Orangefield (41) @ St. Louis Catholic (19) Q4
-
Orangefield (41) @ St. Louis Catholic (19) Q4
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
!!:21/12/3 3:25 -
Orangefield (41) @ St. Louis Catholic (19) Q4
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
!!:14/12/3 4:11 -
Grand Saline (19) @ Joaquin (0) Halftime
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
!!:19/0/H -
Orangefield (41) @ St. Louis Catholic (19) Q4
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
!!:14/9/3 -
Just to be clear, a free speech violation would be if he was arrested for what he said. ABC has a right to terminate him like any employee. Most in this state are at will employees. He has a contact. He will sue them. They will claim they fired him for cause. They will pay him millions of dollars to go away. Poor Jimmy. (And to be clear, there are not many who champion free speech more than me.)
-
Anahuac comes back from a 13 to 0 deficit for the win.
- Today
-
Tarkington at Hardin on Thursday Sept 18
Old Ape replied to kirkwood29's topic in High School Football
John and Hunter I believe. John played RB and Hunter played at La Tech. D1 kids from Hardin are automatic legends! Anyways they have a band that plays a lot of events/ birthday parties in the area. John plays the piano and Hunter plays the violin. They are really good! -
!!: 12/38/H
-
Grand Saline (19) @ Joaquin (0) Halftime
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
!!:13/0/2 -
At this point they need to hope that they dont although they shouldnt but "if they did" that district will be brutal for them.
-
Snapshot Day is Oct 31 What is Snapshot Day?
89Falcon replied to Matthew328's topic in High School Football
You should volunteer to audit the numbers. Put in a request with UIL and TEA. -
Orangefield (41) @ St. Louis Catholic (19) Q4
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
!!:14/9/H -
The Modern Legal Standard for Unprotected Speech The “clear and present danger” test was replaced by a more rigorous standard in the 1969 Supreme Court case Brandenburg v. Ohio. This case established the current legal framework for when inflammatory speech loses First Amendment protection. The Brandenburg test is a two-pronged analysis: the speech must be “directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action,” and it must be “likely to incite or produce such action.” [Hidden Content] The issues surrounding free speech haven’t been addressed since this case. The internet & social media has complicated this issue as ‘imminent & likely’ are not known since what’s on the interwebs lives on indefinitely, and can incite an ‘immediate reaction’ at any time. Of course, most employees are ‘at will’ and can be fired for any reason unless there’s another personal contract or service contract involved where other conditions have to be met.
-
!!: 12/38/2/3:45
-
Grand Saline (19) @ Joaquin (0) Halftime
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
!!:7/0/1