Jump to content

TOP PITCHERS IN 21 3A


JRF1992

Recommended Posts

[quote name="East TX" post="735739" timestamp="1262046515"]
No he is not--a couple from OF and a couple from BC....come to the games and find out...lol
[/quote]

Johnson, in my opinion, is the best pitcher, along with BC's Hicks.  I have a little bit more first hand knowledge about all the returning pitchers, and to me he is right up with the best pitchers in the area and/or state.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
who is the "better" pitcher is a touchy subject.
Hicks, Felts, Statum, and Johnson are the top 4 i'd say.
i' m not sure if all my stats are right, im just doing this off memory,
but i recall that Felts had the best ERA of the bunch with Hicks close behind. then johnson and statum were close together a full run higher than the first pair.
In terms of WINS, Matt had the most with 13, then I believe Logan had 10.
All these pitchers go about thier business with a different style though.
Johnson doesnt throw hard, but he locates and gets guys fishing very well.
Hicks has the best overall stuff in the bunch, and he just overpowers hitters when he's on.
Felts is aggressive and attacks hitters and it leads to quick innings and easy outs.
Statum is a a mixture of all 3. sometimes aggressive, sometimes nippy, and can be overpowering at times.
I cant point a finger and say one is the best, but these are definitely the top pitchers in 21-3a based on last year's performances.
every year more emerge though, goodluck to all.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Orangeboy
[quote name="JRF1992" post="736321" timestamp="1262147546"]
how about Flowers from Silsbee he had one of the nest era's in the district last year with a 1.38 that has to be something
[/quote]

Great kid, works hard!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="Critter" post="751037" timestamp="1264705276"]
[quote author=mres link=topic=64155.msg751011#msg751011 date=1264704005]
no brainer logan johnson ,then hicks
[/quote]
I would agree with you taking those two but not in that order  ;)
[/quote]ya it is in that order the only reason everybody isnt gettin pregnat off of logan becasue he hasn't been signed yet and hicks has so they both are equal but logan has the slight advantage cause he's taller
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="mres" post="751045" timestamp="1264705904"]
[quote author=Critter link=topic=64155.msg751037#msg751037 date=1264705276]
[quote author=mres link=topic=64155.msg751011#msg751011 date=1264704005]
no brainer logan johnson ,then hicks
[/quote]
I would agree with you taking those two but not in that order  ;)
[/quote]ya it is in that order the only reason everybody isnt gettin pregnat off of logan becasue he hasn't been signed yet and hicks has so they both are equal but logan has the slight advantage cause he's taller
[/quote]
WOW  :o :o  because he's taller he gets the advantage? How about Advantage Hicks because of he's proven it?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="mres" post="751045" timestamp="1264705904"]
[quote author=Critter link=topic=64155.msg751037#msg751037 date=1264705276]
[quote author=mres link=topic=64155.msg751011#msg751011 date=1264704005]
no brainer logan johnson ,then hicks
[/quote]
I would agree with you taking those two but not in that order  ;)
[/quote]ya it is in that order the only reason everybody isnt gettin pregnat off of logan becasue he hasn't been signed yet and hicks has so they both are equal but logan has the slight advantage cause he's taller
[/quote]


Because he is taller?  ???

Height=potential. Matt is proven.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="mres" post="751045" timestamp="1264705904"]
[quote author=Critter link=topic=64155.msg751037#msg751037 date=1264705276]
[quote author=mres link=topic=64155.msg751011#msg751011 date=1264704005]
no brainer logan johnson ,then hicks
[/quote]
I would agree with you taking those two but not in that order  ;)
[/quote]ya it is in that order the only reason everybody isnt gettin pregnat off of logan becasue he hasn't been signed yet and hicks has so they both are equal but logan has [b]the slight advantage cause he's taller[/b][/quote]

[IMG]http://i894.photobucket.com/albums/ac149/maquiladora7/71ee9575.gif[/img]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="mres" post="751045" timestamp="1264705904"]
[quote author=Critter link=topic=64155.msg751037#msg751037 date=1264705276]
[quote author=mres link=topic=64155.msg751011#msg751011 date=1264704005]
no brainer logan johnson ,then hicks
[/quote]
I would agree with you taking those two but not in that order  ;)
[/quote]ya it is in that order the only reason everybody isnt gettin pregnat off of logan becasue he hasn't been signed yet and hicks has so they both are equal but logan has the slight advantage cause he's taller
[/quote]

Not even close in comparision......Hicks has prove since he was a freshman that he is above the rest. Don't be jelious of him.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hicks has stood out for years now.  He has a great record and has pitched to all the teams played that were the best scheduled; plus, led to deep in the playoffs.  He has proven to win the big ones over and over for years

Question, what is BCs Mitchell Hubbard's top speed?
He seems to be ready to join an excellent team brace of good HS Pitchers.


Over at OF, I like their pitcher Chase Angelle he stands out as quite superior IMO.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="East TX" post="755383" timestamp="1265341925"]
Hicks has stood out for years now.  He has a great record and has pitched to all the teams played that were the best scheduled; plus, led to deep in the playoffs.  He has proven to win the big ones over and over for years

Question, what is BCs Mitchell Hubbard's top speed?
He seems to be ready to join an excellent team brace of good HS Pitchers.


Over at OF, I like their pitcher Chase Angelle he stands out as quite superior IMO.
[/quote]

Not trying to say who's better, but I would think that if Johnson was put in the big games that Hicks threw in, who's to say he would've done better or worse?  Hamshire never really had any big games for him to win, and the games he did pitch they won the majority of them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, all I know is if I had to start a team and got to choose whoever I wanted out of 21-3A, I would start with Felts of Orangefield. He may not be the best pitcher, but he is by far the best player in the entire area.

Felts will be the only player from this class locally to play professionally at a high level.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="AggiesAreWe" post="755395" timestamp="1265344224"]
Well, all I know is if I had to start a team and got to choose whoever I wanted out of 21-3A, I would start with Felts of Orangefield. He may not be the best pitcher, but he is by far the best player in the entire area.

Felts will be the only player from this class locally to play professionally at a high level.
[/quote]
Are you trying to start a debate?????
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,952
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...