UT alum Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago President Surrender squealed “calf rope” to the country he claimed three months ago he would accept only “unconditional surrender” from. This is the most embarrassing foreign policy blunder in American History. Not to mention costly. Get their oil back flowing. Give them their money back, à la Obama. Kick in $300 billion more to help them rebuild what we destroyed. Fix everything back the way it was before it started. The nuclear weapons agreement is even less stringent in wording than the Obama/Kerry deal. Not winning. Humiliating defeat. Quote
thetragichippy Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 14 minutes ago, UT alum said: President Surrender squealed “calf rope” to the country he claimed three months ago he would accept only “unconditional surrender” from. This is the most embarrassing foreign policy blunder in American History. Not to mention costly. Get their oil back flowing. Give them their money back, à la Obama. Kick in $300 billion more to help them rebuild what we destroyed. Fix everything back the way it was before it started. The nuclear weapons agreement is even less stringent in wording than the Obama/Kerry deal. Not winning. Humiliating defeat. Not surprising..... There would of been absolutely nothing he could of done that you would approved of. That's OK though - no money from US is being given to them, and if they don't live up to agreement, we have option to go back to bombing...... Reagan, Slim Charles and baddog 2 1 Quote
UT alum Posted 3 hours ago Author Report Posted 3 hours ago 48 minutes ago, thetragichippy said: Not surprising..... There would of been absolutely nothing he could of done that you would approved of. That's OK though - no money from US is being given to them, and if they don't live up to agreement, we have option to go back to bombing...... That option was not negotiated. Bombing is an option that always exists. Why wouldn’t they live up to the agreement? It’s basically the sane one they had. I would have approved of him never starting this fiasco. Quote
baddog Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 3 minutes ago, UT alum said: That option was not negotiated. Bombing is an option that always exists. Why wouldn’t they live up to the agreement? It’s basically the sane one they had. I would have approved of him never starting this fiasco. This war had been waging for decades. To say that Trump “started” it is simply finger pointing. I’m shocked. Quote
Slim Charles Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 54 minutes ago, thetragichippy said: Not surprising..... There would of been absolutely nothing he could of done that you would approved of. That's OK though - no money from US is being given to them, and if they don't live up to agreement, we have option to go back to bombing...... That's the thing, right? It wouldn't matter what the outcome was, what was in the MOU, none of it. TDS sufferers would still parrot the same MSM talking points and say how terrible it was. Their entire platform is Trump bad...that's it. It's why their entire party is being taking over by the DSA and far left radicals. The mid-terms will be the judge. Quote
OlDawg Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago I’m amazed at all the criticisms/kudos for an agreement that doesn’t yet exist… Quote
Porter Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 37 minutes ago, OlDawg said: I’m amazed at all the criticisms/kudos for an agreement that doesn’t yet exist… The deal might as well be written on toilet paper because they will violate it you can bank on it. As for as bombing them that might trigger them closing off the strait again but as you’ve said other countries are looking for other alternatives for their oil but it would still hurt the global economy imo. We should have been all in from the beginning to take out the oppressive regime and secure the uranium or not go in at all imo. Trump ran his piehole too much and Iran called his bluff. What a mess. Quote
Porter Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 37 minutes ago, OlDawg said: I’m amazed at all the criticisms/kudos for an agreement that doesn’t yet exist… The deal might as well be written on toilet paper because they will violate it you can bank on it. As for as bombing them that might trigger them closing off the strait again but as you’ve said other countries are looking for other alternatives for their oil but it would still hurt the global economy imo. We should have been all in from the beginning to take out the oppressive regime and secure the uranium or not go in at all imo. Trump ran his piehole too much and Iran called his bluff. What a mess. Quote
OlDawg Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 48 minutes ago, Porter said: The deal might as well be written on toilet paper because they will violate it you can bank on it. As for as bombing them that might trigger them closing off the strait again but as you’ve said other countries are looking for other alternatives for their oil but it would still hurt the global economy imo. We should have been all in from the beginning to take out the oppressive regime and secure the uranium or not go in at all imo. Trump ran his piehole too much and Iran called his bluff. What a mess. You won’t find any argument from me. But, this was a forgone conclusion as soon as the ceasefire was called. It’s been written on the wall since. Porter 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.