5GallonBucket Posted yesterday at 01:13 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:13 AM 3 hours ago, Reagan said: Think about this: On the surface we get the impression that China wants Taiwan. And they might. But, they didn't make a move in Trump's first term. Which I can understand this. During Joebama's term, or whoever was in charge, they had a fantastic opportunity to invade. Joe and his cocaine son where basically chinese assets. Nothing would have stopped china. But they didn't invade. Now Trump again. Not gonna happen. Thoughts?! Well I say that because of what my military contacts have told me who are stationed in the pacific…. At least once they were put on alert during bidens term Quote
Reagan Posted yesterday at 04:42 AM Report Posted yesterday at 04:42 AM True! @Big girl @UT alum @DCT @Boyz N Da Hood @CardinalBacker Quote
DCT Posted yesterday at 11:35 AM Report Posted yesterday at 11:35 AM 6 hours ago, Reagan said: True! @Big girl @UT alum @DCT @Boyz N Da Hood @CardinalBacker Living rent free in his head. Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted yesterday at 12:54 PM Report Posted yesterday at 12:54 PM 1 hour ago, DCT said: Living rent free in his head. He’s simply stating facts. Reagan 1 Quote
thetragichippy Posted yesterday at 01:45 PM Report Posted yesterday at 01:45 PM 15 hours ago, DCT said: Ron and Nikki would have done great. I'd support Ron 2028 should be interesting.....my guess it will be JD Vance versus........ Quote
CardinalBacker Posted yesterday at 02:27 PM Report Posted yesterday at 02:27 PM 41 minutes ago, thetragichippy said: I'd support Ron 2028 should be interesting.....my guess it will be JD Vance versus........ I wonder if it will be JD Vance, as sitting President, vs some other Dem. This pace is feverish. Quote
thetragichippy Posted yesterday at 03:01 PM Report Posted yesterday at 03:01 PM 33 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said: I wonder if it will be JD Vance, as sitting President, vs some other Dem. This pace is feverish. Are you implying Trump will leave office before his term is up? Quote
UT alum Posted yesterday at 04:31 PM Report Posted yesterday at 04:31 PM 11 hours ago, Reagan said: True! @Big girl @UT alum @DCT @Boyz N Da Hood @CardinalBacker Sebastian Gorka is a prevaricating enemy of personal freedom. He came from working for Orban in Hungary to working for Trump in America. Immigrant, no less, but white ones get a pass under the Weasel. Read up on the transfer of that money. Timing was bad, but it was their money and would they have wound up with it after legal battling, anyway. Quote
Reagan Posted yesterday at 04:57 PM Report Posted yesterday at 04:57 PM 5 hours ago, DCT said: Living rent free in his head. I see facts tend to bore you! Quote
Reagan Posted yesterday at 05:00 PM Report Posted yesterday at 05:00 PM 29 minutes ago, UT alum said: Sebastian Gorka is a prevaricating enemy of personal freedom. He came from working for Orban in Hungary to working for Trump in America. Immigrant, no less, but white ones get a pass under the Weasel. Read up on the transfer of that money. Timing was bad, but it was their money and would they have wound up with it after legal battling, anyway. I won't insult your intelligence by suggesting that you really believe what you just said! Quote
thetragichippy Posted yesterday at 05:45 PM Report Posted yesterday at 05:45 PM 1 hour ago, UT alum said: Immigrant, no less, but white ones get a pass under the Weasel. He became a nationalized Citizen in 2012. He also has several degrees, the kind of immigrant that brings value to the USA. Quote
CardinalBacker Posted yesterday at 06:04 PM Report Posted yesterday at 06:04 PM 3 hours ago, thetragichippy said: Are you implying Trump will leave office before his term is up? There’s no way to know for sure…. But I’m having a hard time imagining that he’ll still be around, fighting the entire world 3 and a half years from now. He’s not a young dude. That guy could bust a spring at any minute. Looking back at how quickly Biden deteriorated, anything is possible. Quote
baddog Posted yesterday at 06:45 PM Author Report Posted yesterday at 06:45 PM 30 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said: There’s no way to know for sure…. But I’m having a hard time imagining that he’ll still be around, fighting the entire world 3 and a half years from now. He’s not a young dude. That guy could bust a spring at any minute. Looking back at how quickly Biden deteriorated, anything is possible. I agree that anyone Trump’s age could decline quickly like Biden. At least we can also agree that Biden’s brain was/is toast. Trump appears very cognizant and is very coherent in his communication. He seems very fit to me. I like the way Trump is handling Iran. He has been very patient imo. Iran has enough weapons grade uranium to make several nuclear bombs, but U.N. officials seem to think Iran will not pursue a bomb. Lmao. Like I would believe anything that comes out of the U.N. when it comes to protecting Israel. What else can weapons grade uranium be used for? Taking out their facilities is a much better option than giving them $billions and pinky swearing like Obama and Biden did. Quote
CardinalBacker Posted 23 hours ago Report Posted 23 hours ago 11 minutes ago, baddog said: I agree that anyone Trump’s age could decline quickly like Biden. At least we can also agree that Biden’s brain was/is toast. Trump appears very cognizant and is very coherent in his communication. He seems very fit to me. I like the way Trump is handling Iran. He has been very patient imo. Iran has enough weapons grade uranium to make several nuclear bombs, but U.N. officials seem to think Iran will not pursue a bomb. Lmao. Like I would believe anything that comes out of the U.N. when it comes to protecting Israel. What else can weapons grade uranium be used for? Taking out their facilities is a much better option than giving them $billions and pinky swearing like Obama and Biden did. It’s not just being 79 years old… it’s got to be unbelievably stressful. It would be bad if things were going smoothly, but things are anything but smooth right now. The only positive that I can see for Trump at the moment is that it seems like he isn’t fighting off the legal system for the time being. I fully expect that to kick back off if the House flips next year. baddog 1 Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted 23 hours ago Report Posted 23 hours ago 25 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said: It’s not just being 79 years old… it’s got to be unbelievably stressful. It would be bad if things were going smoothly, but things are anything but smooth right now. The only positive that I can see for Trump at the moment is that it seems like he isn’t fighting off the legal system for the time being. I fully expect that to kick back off if the House flips next year. Now there’s a campaign slogan, “Vote democrat so we can impeach Trump…AGAIN!” Personally, I hope they never change. Quote
thetragichippy Posted 23 hours ago Report Posted 23 hours ago 1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said: There’s no way to know for sure…. But I’m having a hard time imagining that he’ll still be around, fighting the entire world 3 and a half years from now. He’s not a young dude. The way he handled himself in 2016 with Covid, Russia Gate, Sexual harassment charges from the 1800's, then aftermath of Jan 6th, New York, Georgia, survived two assassination attempts and the man still played golf and won the popular vote. In comparison, this is a walk in the park. While he makes the final decisions, he's got a ton of advisors and support staff. My prediction is Iran makes a deal and we don't get involved (although there is enough support to warrant it) and Russia/Ukraine is done before Christmas, LumRaiderFan, Reagan and 5GallonBucket 3 Quote
Reagan Posted 22 hours ago Report Posted 22 hours ago 46 minutes ago, thetragichippy said: The way he handled himself in 2016 with Covid, Russia Gate, Sexual harassment charges from the 1800's, then aftermath of Jan 6th, New York, Georgia, survived two assassination attempts and the man still played golf and won the popular vote. In comparison, this is a walk in the park. While he makes the final decisions, he's got a ton of advisors and support staff. My prediction is Iran makes a deal and we don't get involved (although there is enough support to warrant it) and Russia/Ukraine is done before Christmas, I've heard two scenarios for the "up to two weeks" decision. But first, let's not confuse some here. He said up to two weeks, could be tomorrow. Anyway... 1) He may want to take the full two weeks to possibly give the Shah's son enough time to start the movement to regain control of Iran. 2) If nothing is done by two weeks, it was stated that Israel has probably assured Trump that they will/can take care of the nuclear site. As an addition: I heard that Israel could possibly drop the 30,000 pound bunker busters by refitting a 767. So... thetragichippy 1 Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago 1 hour ago, Reagan said: I've heard two scenarios for the "up to two weeks" decision. But first, let's not confuse some here. He said up to two weeks, could be tomorrow. Anyway... 1) He may want to take the full two weeks to possibly give the Shah's son enough time to start the movement to regain control of Iran. 2) If nothing is done by two weeks, it was stated that Israel has probably assured Trump that they will/can take care of the nuclear site. As an addition: I heard that Israel could possibly drop the 30,000 pound bunker busters by refitting a 767. So... Israel has also said they could take care of the underground nuclear sites by blowing up access areas and monitoring any activity to gain access. They don’t need any help from us to handle Iran, they only need support if bigger players engage. However, I’m sure they are enjoying the support of a strong administration. Reagan 1 Quote
mat Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago It’s also been said that we need two weeks to pursue known sleeper cells in this country before we strike. Reagan 1 Quote
baddog Posted 4 hours ago Author Report Posted 4 hours ago I forgot to put this with my post above….look at the last statement. Al Jazeera……really? The head of the UN's nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), is Rafael Mariano Grossi. He recently raised concerns about Iran's lack of cooperation with nuclear inspections, which is hindering independent verification of its nuclear activities. He also stated that there would be "serious consequences" if Israel were to attack Iran's nuclear facilities, specifically mentioning the Bushehr plant. Specifically, regarding the current situation: IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi: is deeply concerned about Iran's failure to cooperate fully with IAEA inspections. He stated that this lack of cooperation prevents independent verification of Iran's nuclear activities, This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . He recently visited Iran for talks and emphasized the need for Iran to cooperate with IAEA inspections. He warned that an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities could have "serious consequences". He has stated he is ready to travel to Iran to assess the situation. He has also stated that there is no evidence that Iran is building a nuclear weapon, This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 52 minutes ago, baddog said: I forgot to put this with my post above….look at the last statement. Al Jazeera……really? The head of the UN's nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), is Rafael Mariano Grossi. He recently raised concerns about Iran's lack of cooperation with nuclear inspections, which is hindering independent verification of its nuclear activities. He also stated that there would be "serious consequences" if Israel were to attack Iran's nuclear facilities, specifically mentioning the Bushehr plant. Specifically, regarding the current situation: IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi: is deeply concerned about Iran's failure to cooperate fully with IAEA inspections. He stated that this lack of cooperation prevents independent verification of Iran's nuclear activities, This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . He recently visited Iran for talks and emphasized the need for Iran to cooperate with IAEA inspections. He warned that an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities could have "serious consequences". He has stated he is ready to travel to Iran to assess the situation. He has also stated that there is no evidence that Iran is building a nuclear weapon, This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . Any global or international organization will be no friend to Israel, or the US. Quote
baddog Posted 3 hours ago Author Report Posted 3 hours ago 26 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said: Any global or international organization will be no friend to Israel, or the US. Totally agree. The U.N. needs to hold their little meetings in another country. LumRaiderFan 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.