Reagan Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, kirkwood29 said: On a different yet more important note - The town of Warren could be SOLD and they still would not have enough money to purchase Scott Surratt No one said he's going to Warren. We are debating coaches vs athletes and using Surratt as the GOAT barometer. Quote
Reagan Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 6 hours ago, bullets13 said: Surratt went to a school with good athletes already in place and got the most out of them. Won a couple of championships, got the backing of the community, got great facilities, and now many of the best players from all the surrounding communities find ways to play there. He's as elite as it gets, but now that the talent is funneling in and the community has the reputation as title town, another solid coach could step in there and keep winning. On the flipside, Surratt is not going to a place with no talent and no support and have them winning championships quickly without players moving in and better facilities. and he's not moving down to the valley and taking over a team and winning state championships in 7 or 70 years. He could dominate that area, but he's still going to lose with his teams when they face dallas and houston late in the playoffs. If this is the case then why didn't any of the previous coaches win at least one State Title? Surratt won it in his second year. The three previous coaches' records: Decent but not great! 2000 1-9-0 161-310 Charles Lafall 2001 1-9-0 96-269 Charles Lafall 2002 TRI 7-5-0 270-167 Charles Lafall 2003 R 8-4-0 360-293 Benny Mitchell 2004 6-4-0 315-286 Benny Mitchell 2005 TH 7-5-0 327-206 Mike Bickham 2006 7-3-0 325-202 Mike Bickham Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.