Jump to content

Lumberton at LCM


RaiderGirl22

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Gameday2 said:

A little information for this upcoming game//                              
District games  / both 3-0 

Bears: scored 87/ given up 69

Raiders: scored141/ given up 49

 

Bears have given up 28 to Vidor, 13 to Livingston and 7 to Splendora. Total points allowed is 48, not 69. 
 

no matter what the total is, I think Lumberton wins by 4 TD’s this week

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m no head coach, but in my opinion, I would gain a healthy lead then start putting in 2’s by the 4th quarter. Keep everyone healthy, and get some reps to some guys you may have to lean on down the stretch. For that reason I think it would be closer. Plus for some reason, LCM has always been a thorn in Lumberton‘s side. You never know when it comes to that matchup. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:

I’m no head coach, but in my opinion, I would gain a healthy lead then start putting in 2’s by the 4th quarter. Keep everyone healthy, and get some reps to some guys you may have to lean on down the stretch. For that reason I think it would be closer. Plus for some reason, LCM has always been a thorn in Lumberton‘s side. You never know when it comes to that matchup. 

I wont do a wins and loses match up. Lol but yes we usually have Lumberton's number

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, LCMAlumtiger32 said:

I dont think it will be close. I could see lumberton 21-28 pts. Unless there is injuries we dont know about. LCM will have to slow it down

Well this one worked for Lumberton at the beginning of the year. We can use it too????. Our starting rb isn't back this week. They said next week I think he's eligible  🤣🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...