Jump to content

Elon Musk Plans To Lay Off 75% Of Current Twitter Employees!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, mat said:

This is how you do it. If apple bans Twitter, he’ll get make his own phone.

This is the hidden content, please

There has been a big push by globalists to suppress and silence freedom of speech worldwide. The last 2 years a Big battle between Good and Evil has been brought to a new level. You have to be blind or someone with the mindset of Big Girl not to see it. 

Elon Musk has done more to protect the 1st Amendment the last month or so than any Republican or Democrat. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It should be apparent that a segment of society doesn’t like free speech at all. With the Musk acquisition of Twitter it has become more blatant with the attempts at justifying censorship.

Of course they don’t call it censorship. Most comments that I have seen start out with something like, we are for free speech!!….  but….

Then the statement goes into the justification for not having free speech. The justification  brings up hate speech or falsehoods or even a Department of Homeland Security- Disinformation Board.

The fact that the federal government and the president had brought up a  department or board to decide what you should see or hear, should scare the heck out of everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...
On 7/3/2023 at 1:03 PM, Reagan said:

 

Elon explains how can could lay off 80% at Twitter.  You can, he says, when you’re not trying to run a glorified activist organization and you don't care that much about censorship!   Excellent!

We could layoff probably 75% of government employees not miss beat. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,953
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • We all know that each state has its own laws which can be very different, especially in endeavors like annexation or incorporation, so there is no telling what Louisiana law says. I don’t know but I doubt that there is a point of appeal for Baton Rouge to force St. George to be absorbed back into Baton Rouge by now giving them what they asked for years ago. “Oh, we lost? Well let’s just undo incorporation, ruled as legal by the Supreme Court (of LA)  by going back and giving them what they asked for”. There has to be a law allowing such an appeal. I think what I read about the lower court decisions which actually backed up Baton Rouge, they did not all rule that incorporation was illegal but that they did not think the city could have services up and running soon enough. So you have a court saying that sure you can split but only if we agree that you can provide services get enough. In Louisiana, who knows? I doubt that Texas has such a mechanism to allow a city to split, for example, could the west end of Beaumont say that they wish to make their own city against Beaumont’s objection? I doubt it. Certainly Beaumont could allow a city to be created as Port Arthur did with Bridge City and Taylor’s Landing. There is a huge difference in allowing and forcing which is what happened in Baton Rouge. Similar to the sometime discussed topic of Texas splitting off from the United States because they don’t like the way things are going, think if citizens in any city in the United States were allowed to create their own city, which could not be stopped by the parent city.  That could get interesting!! Don't like what is happening in the south side of Chicago? Just de-annex and create your own city!! Anyway, I thought that it is an interesting story when the capital city splits in half.   
    • Wasn't that 1st round loss last year? Also, during those previous 10 years I am pretty sure Jasper didn't go 2-58 in district play in the other 5 sports.
    • Ma'am, I don't think he said all Muslims were like that. If I'm reading this right, he's referencing the terrorist Muslims. You know, the ones who commit murder & have no regard for anyone who doesn't follow their jihadist beliefs...
    • Great playoff run, no doubt.  They did make the 3rd round(1 less) 4 of the previous 10 years, only one first round loss. 6 district championships and 4 second place.  The only 4 years Carthage was in the same district. So no, I'm not sure it does make sense.
    • 21-6A Humble Kingwood- 3 Pasadena Memorial-2   17-5A Barbers Hill- 2 Angleton- 1
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...