Jump to content

Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff


Hagar

Recommended Posts

Our top military man, Gen. Mark Milley, told Congress in February, in a closed door meeting, that if Russia launches a full scale invasion (which they did) that Kyiv could fall within 72 hours.  Here we are two weeks later and it still hasn’t fallen.  This guy is suppose to be the pinnacle of a military mind.  One thing we know, he knows how to ram Woke down the throat of our troops.  He knows how to drag morale down to nothing.  Now we know that he doesn’t know 💩 about Russia. Again, scary stuff.  We need a MacArthur, Nimitz or a Patton.  Surely Milley is not the best we have.

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Hagar changed the title to Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff

I wonder, was Milley thinking the Ukraine was being defended by woke (I don’t know which gender I am) troops?  Does he even know which gender he is?  I was a Specialist (E-4) in the military (refused OCS).  That’s very low on the military scale.  To think that I might make a better JCS than him tells you how inept he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hagar said:

I wonder, was Milley thinking the Ukraine was being defended by woke (I don’t know which gender I am) troops?  Does he even know which gender he is?  I was a Specialist (E-4) in the military (refused OCS).  That’s very low on the military scale.  To think that I might make a better JCS than him tells you how inept he is.

I liked Schwarzkopf. Tuned him in almost every day during the Gulf war. He is missed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, tvc184 said:

I don’t think that was a “full scale invasion”.

The term, “full scale invasion” I’d think is relative.  I’ve seen several headlines/links referring to it as “Full scale invasion”.  The one I’ve attached here calls it “a large scale invasion”.  I’d guess the terms are not only based on the number in the attacking force, but the number of defenders as well.  Oh, and let’s not forget number of tanks, but I’m guessing.

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Hagar said:

The term, “full scale invasion” I’d think is relative.  I’ve seen several headlines/links referring to it as “Full scale invasion”.  The one I’ve attached here calls it “a large scale invasion”.  I’d guess the terms are not only based on the number in the attacking force, but the number of defenders as well.  Oh, and let’s not forget number of tanks, but I’m guessing.

This is the hidden content, please

I am not criticizing your comment but “headlines” are usually clickbait and/or sensationalism. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LumRaiderFan said:

I’m sure it looks full scale if you’re on the receiving end of it.

I’m not sure why it’s still being discussed whether or not putin is guilty of war crimes.

 

1 hour ago, LumRaiderFan said:

I’m sure it looks full scale if you’re on the receiving end of it.

I’m not sure why it’s still being discussed whether or not putin is guilty of war crimes.

biden and the dims really don’t want to call it hate crimes.  They will not go after Putin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BS Wildcats said:

 

biden and the dims really don’t want to call it hate crimes.  They will not go after Putin.

Fortunately it’s not their call.

Unfortunately (I think) the victim country has to be a signatory of the ICC Rome agreement.  Ukraine has never signed nor ratified the Rome accords. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/12/2022 at 9:26 PM, BS Wildcats said:

 

biden and the dims really don’t want to call it hate crimes.  They will not go after Putin.

In all honesty, Biden appears scared of Putin.  I can think of one good reason why.  When someone buys you, there will inevitably be a “payback” time.  Many of us agree Hunter & Joe have gotten Russian money, so Joe has to give in or Vladimir will spill the beans.  That’s what you get when you elect a man bought & paid for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Hagar said:

In all honesty, Biden appears scared of Putin.  I can think of one good reason why.  When someone buys you, there will inevitably be a “payback” time.  Many of us agree Hunter & Joe have gotten Russian money, so Joe has to give in or Vladimir will spill the beans.  That’s what you get when you elect a man bought & paid for.

He is absolutely afraid of Putin.  And, he is bringing America down with his weaknesses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/11/2022 at 10:00 AM, Hagar said:

Our top military man, Gen. Mark Milley, told Congress in February, in a closed door meeting, that if Russia launches a full scale invasion (which they did) that Kyiv could fall within 72 hours.  Here we are two weeks later and it still hasn’t fallen.  This guy is suppose to be the pinnacle of a military mind.  One thing we know, he knows how to ram Woke down the throat of our troops.  He knows how to drag morale down to nothing.  Now we know that he doesn’t know 💩 about Russia. Again, scary stuff.  We need a MacArthur, Nimitz or a Patton.  Surely Milley is not the best we have.

This is the hidden content, please

Totally agree about Payton and McArthur. The world would be a better place had we followed their lead. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,966
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...