Jump to content

Pleasant Grove 6 Carthage 31/FINAL

AggiesAreWe

By AggiesAreWe
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • AggiesAreWe changed the title to Pleasant Grove 6 Carthage 31/FINAL
Horton

Horton

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Uncle Pig said:

Carthage defense must be ungodly 

PG had 57 total yards running the ball and 75 yards passing, most of that against the back ups. 
The Dawgs scored 28 points in the third quarter including a pick six. 
The Dawg D have scored 5 touchdowns in 4 games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Horton

Horton

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Uncle Pig said:

That’s ‘83 Daingerfield type stuff! I mean not quite but damn good D!

I watch them every week and I can’t believe how good they are. 
Gilmer is a high power offensive machine and I don’t believe they will lose another game unless they play the Dawgs again. 
The Dawgs held them to 17 total yards and one first down into the third quarter. Gilmer scored a touchdown on an unbelievable play. They got the ball on there end of the field due to a Dawg fumble. It was fourth down, Gilmer QB was running for his life, threw the to a diving receiver who was covered like a blanket. One in front and one in back in the end zone for their only touchdown. 
The scary part is, they are getting better every week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • BS Wildcats
      Fake Pandemic Scam Part 2?!

      By BS Wildcats · Posted

      Will probably be released by the Democrats come September.  Sound familiar?
    • 72 Pinto
      Bridge City is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • bullets13
      Bridge City is open

      By bullets13 · Posted

      I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • Eagles12
      Bridge City is open

      By Eagles12 · Posted

      He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • 72 Pinto
      LC-M is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...