Jump to content

West Orange-Stark 63 Orangefield 56/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

  • AggiesAreWe changed the title to West Orange-Stark 63 Orangefield 56/FINAL

Missed last night games because I was watching the girls on senior night.  How about my Mustangs sweeping the night from the bobcats.  Both hard fought games until the end.  Enjoy seeing my Stangs do their thang.  Boys are starting to play together, @Boneyard Boys we're going to be a tough game for whoever we play coming up.  Wilson has our boys playing together.  Going to be fun against an always tough Tigers team Friday.  I know I will be there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JACK OF ALL TRADES said:

@Boneyard Boys Covid hit you guys and my Mustangs hard both having to play at least 2 games with our JV Squads.  I think my Stangs could have upset BC or Lumberton possibly if they were given the chance.  What do you think?

No doubt the team we watched in the last matchup was definitely hard to handle, that must have been the full WOS squad. They had the size, athleticism and depth to give either of those teams a run for their money. Shoot they didn’t even start #23 but he came in off the bench and did his thing, I look for them to make some noise to finish out the season. It’s a shame Covid happened because they will definitely have a tough matchup in the first round of the playoffs with either HH or HJ but I think they will compete. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, JACK OF ALL TRADES said:

@Boneyard Boys Covid hit you guys and my Mustangs hard both having to play at least 2 games with our JV Squads.  I think my Stangs could have upset BC or Lumberton possibly if they were given the chance.  What do you think?

That size would give anyone of those teams some trouble. The only thing is I hate that defense they run sometimes when they try to force a player one way.the only problem is a team gets to the rim to easy.they got a few block shots.but a team that knows how to make the extra pass would get a lay up. There rotation to do that isn't there yet. But #13 does a great job.young kids has to understand the concept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Exactly Lum. Right is still right regardless which way the wind blows. 
    • High Point walks it off.  Vandy Whistler headed home!
    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...