Jump to content

400,000 anchor babies born in 2019


PhatMack19

Recommended Posts

Sneak in the country illegally, have kids, live off the government tit for years while paying no taxes.  Profit  
 

 

Quote:

The number of babies born to illegal immigrants surpassed American births in nearly all 50 states last year. Analysis by the Center for Immigration Studies shows nearly 400,000 so-called 'anchor babies' were born in the U.S. in 2019.

Data from 2018 reveals about 300,000 'anchor babies' are born in the U.S. every year. These children immediately gain American citizenship, which then extends financial, legal and social benefits to their illegal alien parents.

President Trump has yet to sign an executive order to end the policy, which critics say incentivizes illegal immigration into the U.S.

Meanwhile, data from the U.S. Census Bureau shows a continuing decline in the U.S. birthrate. California and Texas were the only two states whose birthrates exceeded those of anchor babies across the nation in 2019.

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said:

I have never understood why we allow a baby that is born to illegals in our country to automatically be a citizen.  The one thing the founding fathers got wrong.  

That was never the Founding Father's intent and there are plenty of opinions stated that verify that.

It has never made sense to me.  If someone is on vacation in the US from England and has a baby, is that baby entitled to US citizenship?

This is the hidden content, please

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My friend's mom was a mexican citizen that visited family in texas. Then she went on a cruise out of Galveston. My friend was born on the ship, in international water. His birth certificate says he was born in galveston. He is an american citizen that graduated from high school. Works hard, makes good money, and sends half of it back to his family in mexico. I cant say I agree with the rules that allow this to happen. But he is a great friend and his life would have never been the same if he was in mexico.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

My friend's mom was a mexican citizen that visited family in texas. Then she went on a cruise out of Galveston. My friend was born on the ship, in international water. His birth certificate says he was born in galveston. He is an american citizen that graduated from high school. Works hard, makes good money, and sends half of it back to his family in mexico. I cant say I agree with the rules that allow this to happen. But he is a great friend and his life would have never been the same if he was in mexico.

Good post and an example of how there are positive exceptions to every rule, but when you look at the numbers in Mack’s post, it becomes obvious we can’t keep going down this road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,977
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • We'll see. I don't trust us. 
    • Starting pitching has been shaky the last few weeks due to some injuries outside of Hagen Smith.  He goes tomorrow, so y’all should be fine 
    • Manchin may get it but any mention of the radical left that wanted to get rid of the filibuster and end almost 220 years of history because the Democrats are mad?  The House and Senate are obviously different legislative bodies with entirely different election processes and rules for a reason. The House can vote on laws with a simple majority vote. The Senate put rules in place that it would make it much tougher to pass laws. Laws should be difficult to pass. The Senate is often the holdup of the right and left. It takes 60 votes to break the filibuster so any law will almost certainly require agreement at least in part, from opposing sides of an issue. Because they can’t get laws passed, the radical left is like a baby having a tantrum and wants to change over 200 years of history and make it potentially ridiculously easy to pass laws. I have seen current poll maps and it is possible for the Republicans to sweep into complete power in November but by the tiniest margin. That would possibly mean that a single vote margin in both houses could enact what you might call the radical right laws. There would be nothing that the Democrats could do to stop any legislation whatsoever if the left (they are all radical, minus Manchin) got their filibuster rule changed.  That is where the current filibuster comes into play as any new law would require several Democrats to agree with the majority Republicans and vice versa.  Do you want the potential for your radical right to have free rein as the radical left wants by killing the filibuster or is the radical left just as (if not more) dangerous? Let’s see if we have a history in this area? Oh yeah, the Democrats changed the rules in the Senate to allow federal judges to not have to overcome the filibuster. Obama was not getting his federal judge nominations passed and being angry, they changed the rules instead of nominating more moderate justices. They were warned that it would come back to bite them. They didn’t care and chose the nuclear option to change the rules. Oops! Any guess how Trump got all of his Supreme Court nominees passed against strong Democrat opposition? The Democrats got rid of the filibuster for federal judges after another tantrum   So when you are so worried about the radical right, are you equally concerned in what the radical left is always doing by changing rules and history which were put into place just for situations like we are in? So while Manchin gets it, what about his other 50 colleagues (49 + Harris)?  What concerns you more, Abbott and Paxton or the Democrats who want to make it to where if the Republicans do take over, they can go wild… at least in your mind? 
    • MODS please remove that ISD twitter link! I had no idea it would copy the whole posting. I only highlighted the portion about the venue change. Sorry about that!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...