Jump to content

Sheldon C.E. King 30 Beaumont United 13/FINAL

WOSgrad

By WOSgrad
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

Alpha Wolf

Alpha Wolf

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

Let me guess: Vaughn didn't go off running like he did against WB and that tiny Kang RB went off tonight, am i close?

Pretty much.  The defense kept him bottled up from the time King scored their second TD until they scored in the 3rd.  You can't keep leaving our defense on the field, eventually they will start to give.  Offense is just inept at this point.  Passing game has regressed and until that's fixed, teams will just stack the box.  Soulja will give his post game analysis with more detail...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Alpha Wolf

Alpha Wolf

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Beaumont isd said:

The Ce King offense came out red hot scoring on to Consecutive drive. United fell to respond until late second quarter. Driving down the field with the closing second of the half Daniel Mulonda #16 takes the life out of United with an interception to end that drive. 

Na, West Brook took the life out of them last week...and doesn't look like anyone has started CPR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BMTSoulja1

BMTSoulja1

Posted
Posted

This Game Was just ugly from the jump.  Defense actually played well, but ended up giving later on in this game having to stay on the field so long.

Offense stunk up the place, like really bad.  We're too predictable and too easy to game plan for.  This is not just on coaching (although coaching was a major part), it was also on the kids.  You Cannot expect to win when the QB throws 2 interceptions and your total passing attempts were 4 and you completed NON.  You CANNOT overthrow a 15 yard WIDE OPEN PASS that had paydirt written all over it. You CANNOT have WR's dropping wide open TD passes. You cannot line up, point to where the blitz is coming from, then continue to run the play the SAME DIRECTION. On special teams, King kicked onside kicks the whole game and recovered on of them.  You cannot allow that in a huge district game. Might've been like 6 turnovers.

This is the second week in a row where I yelled 'It ain't working.  Time to try something else'.  We ran the SAME thing we ran against WB as we did against King with the exact same results.  We popped a few run plays, but everything else was stale.  

This was the kicker though...We drive to King's 2 yard line and come away with NO POINTS.  I really just checked out at this point. I look at the sidelines, I see confusion on the face of coaches and kids. This might've been the worse display of HS offense I've ever seen and the defense got punished for it. At this point, I just don't know what you can do.  It's obvious that the HC will not take over offensive playcalling, but if he did, would it be an upgrade? It's obvious that we will stay on page 1 of the playbook.  It's obvious that we will do plays that actually work ONE time and never go to it again. I just don't know.

We'll take a beating to NS, but at this point, I don't even know if we have a punchers chance against LaPorte, Channelview, or Deer Park. We almost are forced to have to beat these guys to make the playoffs. I'm not confident in that at all after what I whitnessed.  

With that being said, King did play a good game and were very well coached with some good looking athletes.  They actually made in game adjustments to improve themselves as the game went on. That's why they were able to score those quick TD's in the 3rd quarter. I can see now how they were able to Give WB everything they wanted and some 2 weeks ago.

Get back in the lab and for goodness sake, let's get that offense some innovation, creativity and consistency.  SMH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JustUs

JustUs

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

This Game Was just ugly from the jump.  Defense actually played well, but ended up giving later on in this game having to stay on the field so long.

Offense stunk up the place, like really bad.  We're too predictable and too easy to game plan for.  This is not just on coaching (although coaching was a major part), it was also on the kids.  You Cannot expect to win when the QB throws 2 interceptions and your total passing attempts were 4 and you completed NON.  You CANNOT overthrow a 15 yard WIDE OPEN PASS that had paydirt written all over it. You CANNOT have WR's dropping wide open TD passes. You cannot line up, point to where the blitz is coming from, then continue to run the play the SAME DIRECTION. On special teams, King kicked onside kicks the whole game and recovered on of them.  You cannot allow that in a huge district game. Might've been like 6 turnovers.

This is the second week in a row where I yelled 'It ain't working.  Time to try something else'.  We ran the SAME thing we ran against WB as we did against King with the exact same results.  We popped a few run plays, but everything else was stale.  

This was the kicker though...We drive to King's 2 yard line and come away with NO POINTS.  I really just checked out at this point. I look at the sidelines, I see confusion on the face of coaches and kids. This might've been the worse display of HS offense I've ever seen and the defense got punished for it. At this point, I just don't know what you can do.  It's obvious that the HC will not take over offensive playcalling, but if he did, would it be an upgrade? It's obvious that we will stay on page 1 of the playbook.  It's obvious that we will do plays that actually work ONE time and never go to it again. I just don't know.

We'll take a beating to NS, but at this point, I don't even know if we have a punchers chance against LaPorte, Channelview, or Deer Park. We almost are forced to have to beat these guys to make the playoffs. I'm not confident in that at all after what I whitnessed.  

With that being said, King did play a good game and were very well coached with some good looking athletes.  They actually made in game adjustments to improve themselves as the game went on. That's why they were able to score those quick TD's in the 3rd quarter. I can see now how they were able to Give WB everything they wanted and some 2 weeks ago.

Get back in the lab and for goodness sake, let's get that offense some innovation, creativity and consistency.  SMH.

Thanks for that on point analysis. The solution and not the quick fix is inevitable. It starts at the top. Good luck the rest of the season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,953
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • SmashMouth
      Baton Rouge split in half?

      By SmashMouth · Posted

      No doubt. It's definitely intriguing enough to watch how this all plays out...
    • tvc184
      Baton Rouge split in half?

      By tvc184 · Posted

      We all know that each state has its own laws which can be very different, especially in endeavors like annexation or incorporation, so there is no telling what Louisiana law says. I don’t know but I doubt that there is a point of appeal for Baton Rouge to force St. George to be absorbed back into Baton Rouge by now giving them what they asked for years ago. “Oh, we lost? Well let’s just undo incorporation, ruled as legal by the Supreme Court (of LA)  by going back and giving them what they asked for”. There has to be a law allowing such an appeal. I think what I read about the lower court decisions which actually backed up Baton Rouge, they did not all rule that incorporation was illegal but that they did not think the city could have services up and running soon enough. So you have a court saying that sure you can split but only if we agree that you can provide services get enough. In Louisiana, who knows? I doubt that Texas has such a mechanism to allow a city to split, for example, could the west end of Beaumont say that they wish to make their own city against Beaumont’s objection? I doubt it. Certainly Beaumont could allow a city to be created as Port Arthur did with Bridge City and Taylor’s Landing. There is a huge difference in allowing and forcing which is what happened in Baton Rouge. Similar to the sometime discussed topic of Texas splitting off from the United States because they don’t like the way things are going, think if citizens in any city in the United States were allowed to create their own city, which could not be stopped by the parent city.  That could get interesting!! Don't like what is happening in the south side of Chicago? Just de-annex and create your own city!! Anyway, I thought that it is an interesting story when the capital city splits in half.   
    • AggiesAreWe
      What has happened to Jasper?

      By AggiesAreWe · Posted

      Wasn't that 1st round loss last year? Also, during those previous 10 years I am pretty sure Jasper didn't go 2-58 in district play in the other 5 sports.
    • SmashMouth
      Even More From The Friendly muslims!

      By SmashMouth · Posted

      Ma'am, I don't think he said all Muslims were like that. If I'm reading this right, he's referencing the terrorist Muslims. You know, the ones who commit murder & have no regard for anyone who doesn't follow their jihadist beliefs...
    • AHUDDLESTON
      What has happened to Jasper?

      By AHUDDLESTON · Posted

      Great playoff run, no doubt.  They did make the 3rd round(1 less) 4 of the previous 10 years, only one first round loss. 6 district championships and 4 second place.  The only 4 years Carthage was in the same district. So no, I'm not sure it does make sense.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...