Jump to content

FBI Conducts Pre-Dawn Raid on Paul Manafort's House


Hagar

Recommended Posts

This is the hidden content, please

From the article:  The search warranty indicates investigators may have argued to a Fed judge they had reason to believe Manafort's could not be trusted to turn over all records in a response to a Grand Subpoena.

I suppose, based on Hillary's 30,000 missing emails, and Imran Awan smashing all his democratic computer hard drives, you just can't trust people in politics.

I don't have a problem with this, except, why is it only the Republicans?  With all the "destroying of data, and unanswered major questions surrounding the emails, primary voter manipulation, AG Lynch meeting with Bill, ad nauseam, why haven't they done this with any Democrats?  Maybe they have and I didn't hear or don't remember.  Anyone? 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stevenash said:

The Special prosecutor is a bleeding lib as are all of his "helpers"

Yes, I got that.  But why are Repubs the only ones who get Special Prosecutors?  I must have been sick the day my Civics teacher taught us that democrats were exempt.

So why none on any of the Dem shenanigans?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, new tobie said:

Ken Star

Good call nt.  Yep, Ken Starr.  Now let's see if Ken Starr was a fair man.  Found this where Starr said, "Bill Clinton is the most gifted politician of the Baby Boomer era".  A fact that I agree on btw.

This is the hidden content, please

Now has he ever bad mouthed Repubs?  After a short search, I found this, were Starr verbally b-slaps Trump (had to look up excoriates lol).

This is the hidden content, please

Main thing that concerns me about Mueller, I get the impression he and Comey were close.  Mueller was FBI Director for 12 years, then Comey took his place.  If he and Comey were close, it could skew his ability to be impartial.  

If he's on a fishing trip with this Manafort raid, he'll find something on Manafort.  Why do I say that?  Because virtually all of us, unintentionally break the law often.  Had a game show in early 60's with different challenges.  One, this guy could win a nice bundle of money if he could go 1 week without breaking the law.  Lived in city, so didn't drive, and gams show only had a man with him when he walked out of house.  He didn't break the Fed Stamp on his pkg of cigarettes.  I was getting on Freeway yesterday, and sped up to get on - looked down, I was doing 82.  I'd bet everything I own he'll find something on Manafort.  And he would if investigating REBgp or new tobie.

These guys, Mueller & Starr, have a scary amount of power.  I don't remember Starr doing any predawn raids on a witness who was complying.  That's cause for concern.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,953
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • No doubt. It's definitely intriguing enough to watch how this all plays out...
    • We all know that each state has its own laws which can be very different, especially in endeavors like annexation or incorporation, so there is no telling what Louisiana law says. I don’t know but I doubt that there is a point of appeal for Baton Rouge to force St. George to be absorbed back into Baton Rouge by now giving them what they asked for years ago. “Oh, we lost? Well let’s just undo incorporation, ruled as legal by the Supreme Court (of LA)  by going back and giving them what they asked for”. There has to be a law allowing such an appeal. I think what I read about the lower court decisions which actually backed up Baton Rouge, they did not all rule that incorporation was illegal but that they did not think the city could have services up and running soon enough. So you have a court saying that sure you can split but only if we agree that you can provide services get enough. In Louisiana, who knows? I doubt that Texas has such a mechanism to allow a city to split, for example, could the west end of Beaumont say that they wish to make their own city against Beaumont’s objection? I doubt it. Certainly Beaumont could allow a city to be created as Port Arthur did with Bridge City and Taylor’s Landing. There is a huge difference in allowing and forcing which is what happened in Baton Rouge. Similar to the sometime discussed topic of Texas splitting off from the United States because they don’t like the way things are going, think if citizens in any city in the United States were allowed to create their own city, which could not be stopped by the parent city.  That could get interesting!! Don't like what is happening in the south side of Chicago? Just de-annex and create your own city!! Anyway, I thought that it is an interesting story when the capital city splits in half.   
    • Wasn't that 1st round loss last year? Also, during those previous 10 years I am pretty sure Jasper didn't go 2-58 in district play in the other 5 sports.
    • Ma'am, I don't think he said all Muslims were like that. If I'm reading this right, he's referencing the terrorist Muslims. You know, the ones who commit murder & have no regard for anyone who doesn't follow their jihadist beliefs...
    • Great playoff run, no doubt.  They did make the 3rd round(1 less) 4 of the previous 10 years, only one first round loss. 6 district championships and 4 second place.  The only 4 years Carthage was in the same district. So no, I'm not sure it does make sense.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...